Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc. v. Legard
Plaintiff: NEVILLE, RODIE AND SHAW, INC.
Defendant: E.A. PRESCOTT LEGARD, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF EDWIN F. LEGARD, JR. and E.A. Prescott Legard
Case Number: 3:2023cv00266
Filed: February 28, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Janet Bond Arterton
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Fred Weinstein, I on behalf of Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc. (Weinstein, Fred)
March 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER granting #12 Motion for Attorney Fred D. Weinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Clerk on 3/28/2023. (Sichanh, Christina)
March 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 MOTION for Attorney(s) Fred D. Weinstein to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7287329) by Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc.. (Jacobson, Jonathan)
March 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER denying #10 Motion for Fred D. Weinstein to Appear Pro Hac Vice for failure to comply with Local Rule 83.1(d). Bar numbers not listed. Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 3/13/2023. (Sichanh, Christina)
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Fred D. Weinstein to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7268573) by Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc.. (Jacobson, Jonathan)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *E.A. Prescott Legard* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Jonathan D Jacobson- Rubin & Jacobson, LLC* *707 Summer Street* *Ste 5th Floor* *Stamford, CT 06901*. (Sichanh, Christina)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 4 Notice re: Disclosure Statement,, #1 Complaint filed by Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc., #6 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #7 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 2/28/2023.(Sichanh, Christina)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc.. (Jacobson, Jonathan)
March 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jonathan D Jacobson on behalf of Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc. (Jacobson, Jonathan)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/28/2023.(Sichanh, Christina)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Janet Bond Arterton on 2/28/2023.(Sichanh, Christina)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/29/2023 Discovery due by 8/30/2023 Dispositive Motions due by 10/4/2023 Signed by Clerk on 2/28/2023.(Sichanh, Christina)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, any nongovernmental corporate party must electronically file a disclosure statement that identifies any parent corporation and any publicly held corporation owning 10% or more of its stock or states that there is no such corporation. Such disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/28/23.(Hushin, Z.)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge Janet Bond Arterton and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against E.A. PRESCOTT LEGARD, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF EDWIN F. LEGARD, JR. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7254323.), filed by NEVILLE, RODIE AND SHAW, INC..(Jacobson, Jonathan)
February 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Request for Clerk to issue summons as to E.A. PRESCOTT LEGARD, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF EDWIN F. LEGARD, JR.. (Jacobson, Jonathan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Neville, Rodie and Shaw, Inc. v. Legard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: NEVILLE, RODIE AND SHAW, INC.
Represented By: Jonathan D Jacobson
Represented By: David W. Rubin
Represented By: Fred Weinstein, I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E.A. PRESCOTT LEGARD, AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF EDWIN F. LEGARD, JR.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E.A. Prescott Legard
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?