Cummings v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Krystal Lee Cummings |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2024cv00301 |
| March 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Michael P Shea |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
NOTICE by Commissioner of Social Security of filing of Unofficial Text-searchable Copy of Certified Administrative Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Unofficial text-searchable copy of Certified Administrative Record)(Molinaro, John)
|
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Government having filed its administrative record (Doc. No. 16), the court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order (ECF No. 4): Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand, supporting memorandum of law, and statement of material facts (with citations to the Administrative Record) on or before May 26, 2024. Defendant shall file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand, supporting memorandum of law, and statement of material facts (with citations to the Administrative Record) on or before June 25, 2024. Plaintiff may file a reply brief pursuant to Local Rule 7(d) on or before July 9, 2024. Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, counsel are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Scheduling Order which sets forth page limits, form and content requirements for motions, supporting memoranda, and statement of material facts (Doc. No. 4.) The parties should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion.Requests for extensions of these deadlines are discouraged and, unless unusual circumstances dictate otherwise, counsel should not seek an extension of greater than 30 days. Any motion for extension of a deadline must include a showing of good cause as required by Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three days before the existing deadline. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/29/2024.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 16
Social Security Transcripts. (Attachments: #1 Supplement 2 of 10, #2 Supplement 3 of 10, #3 Supplement 4 of 10, #4 Supplement 5 of 10, #5 Supplement 6 of 10, #6 Supplement 7 of 10, #7 Supplement 8 of 10, #8 Supplement 9 of 10, #9 Supplement 10 of 10)(Molinaro, John)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER OF TRANSFER. Absent consent to a Magistrate Judge, this case is reassigned to Judge Kari A. Dooley for all further proceedings. Signed by Clerk on 4/17/2024.(Maturo, F.)
|
|
Filing 14
Order: In light of the plaintiff filing an Amended Complaint #10 within fourteen days of the recommended ruling #8 and Judge Garcia finding the amended claim sufficient to proceed 11 , the undersigned declines to adopt the recommended ruling #8 and directs the Clerk to terminate it as MOOT. Signed by Michael P. Shea, Chief Judge, on April 17, 2024. (Housman, L)
|
|
Filing 13
REMINDER: Standing ORDER on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/27/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Maturo, F.)
|
|
Filing 12
NOTICE of Appearance by John Molinaro on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Molinaro, John)
|
|
Filing 11
INITIAL REVIEW ORDER. The Court has reviewed the Amended Complaint (ECF No. 10) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant. Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 3/13/2024. (Cabral, D)
|
|
Filing 10
AMENDED COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Krystal Lee Cummings.(Pierre Pierre, Eddy)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 3/11/24. (Ruocco, M.)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. RECOMMENDED RULING dismissing #1 Complaint (objections due by 3/25/2024). See attached.Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 3/11/2024. (Cabral, D)
|
|
Filing 7
Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 3/6/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/6/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing ORDER Re: Social Security Cases. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/6/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 3
Standing ORDER on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 5/6/2024. (Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Krystal Lee Cummings. (Pierre Pierre, Eddy)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT Krystal Lee Cummings against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Krystal Lee Cummings. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit civil cover)(Pierre Pierre, Eddy)
|
|
Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
