Securities and Exchange Commission v. Francois E Durmaz et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Marlali Gayrimenkul Yatirimlari, Francois E Durmaz, Gullen Enterprises Inc, Sibel Ince, Mehmet Karakus, Marlali Property Investment Company LLC, Robert C Pribilski and USA Retirement Management Services |
| Temporary Receiver Stephen J. Donell |
| 2:2010cv01689 |
| March 9, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| George H Wu |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
105
FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS FRANCOIS E DURMAZ, ROBERT C PRIBILSKI AND USA RETIREMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, AND RELIEF DEFENDANTS SIBEL INCE, MEHMET KARAKUS, MARLALI GAYRIMENKUL YATIRIMLARI, MARLALI GAYRIM ENKUL YATIRIMLARI, MARLALI PROPERTY INVESTMENT COMPANY, LLC, AND GULEN ENTERPRISES, INC. by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: [NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT]Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission) has filed a Complaint and defendant USA Retirement Management Services, a/k/a USA Retirement Financial Services, Inc. (USARMS) and relief defendants Marlali Gayrimenkul Yatirimlari (MGY), Marlali Property Investment Company, LLC (Marlali Property), and Gulen Enterprises, Inc. (Gulen En terprises) have entered general appearances; consented to the Courts jurisdiction over them and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to j urisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment. In addition, the Commission filed a Motion for Final Judgment By Default Against Defendants Francois E. Durmaz a/k/a Mahmut E. Durm az (Durmaz) and Robert C. Pribilski (Pribilski) and Relief Defendants Sibel Ince (Ince) and Mehmet Karakus (Karakus) (Motion for Final Judgment) pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court, having considered the Commissions motion, the memorandum of points and authorities filed in support of the motion, the declarations, and all other documents filed in support of the motion, and all other evidence and argument presented regarding the motion, enters the following Final Judgment. IT IS ORDERED that the Commission's Motion for Final Judgment is hereby GRANTED. The hearing set for April 16, 2012, at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED. (See document for further details.) (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
