Todd and Bonnie Overturf et al v. Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Inc et al
Bonnie Overturf, The Overturf Company and Todd Overturf |
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Inc, Bryan J Merryman, Jan Sheehy, Simon Property Group Inc and Trustee of the Retail Property Trust |
8:2008cv00365 |
April 3, 2008 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
Orange |
Robert N. Block |
Andrew J. Guilford |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 121 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE held before Judge Andrew J. Guilford.The Court on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Counterclaimant The Real Property Trust to show cause in writing no later than September 30, 2009 why the counterclaim should n ot be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Alternatively, it will be a sufficient response to this OSC to file on or before the OSC date in this paragraph one of the following: A proof of service of the summons and complaint on defendant(s); Papers see king entry of default or a default judgment; Answers or other filings by the defendant(s). NO oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. (db) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.