Singh,et al v. Shannon, et al
| Satish K Singh and Meena R Singh |
| Steve Graves, Candace McCarthy Leone Living Trust, Richard Patterson, Donna J Patterson, Tule River Indian Tribe, Robert Nichols, Grace C Nichols, Tule River Tribal Council, Betty Hayward, William Barry Shannon, Candace McCarthy Leone and Sopac McCarthy Tompkins living trust |
| 1:2009cv00481 |
| March 13, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Real Property: Other Office |
| Tulare |
| Gary S. Austin |
| Anthony W. Ishii |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 18:241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER CLOSING CASE in Light of Voluntary Dismissal, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/5/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Sondheim, M)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER on Plaintiffs' Notice of Voluntary Dismissal signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/19/2009. Betty Hayward; Candace McCarthy Leone; Donna J Patterson; Richard Patterson; William Barry Shannon; Sopac McCarthy Tompkins living trust; Tule River Indian Tribe; Tule River Tribal Council; Candace McCarthy Leone Living Trust and Steve Graves terminated from action. (Flores, E)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER RESOLVING Defendants' 18 , 19 Motion to Dismiss and Allowing Plaintiffs to File a First Amended Complaint Pursuant to the Parties' Stipulation signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 7/13/2009. First Amended Complaint Due by 7/17/2009. (Sant Agata, S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
