Baker v. County of Sonoma et al
Eric James Baker |
County of Sonoma, Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Bill Cogbill, California Forensic Medical Group, Inc., James Luders, John Doe "Lincoln", John Doe "Cortez" and John Doe "Espino" |
3:2008cv03433 |
July 16, 2008 |
US District Court for the Northern District of California |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
Sonoma |
Elizabeth D. Laporte |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 226 ORDER re 224 Stipulation, filed by Sonoma County Sheriff's Department, Bill Cogbill, Lewis Lincoln, Eduardo Espino, Daniel Cortez, County of Sonoma. Signed by Judge Laporte on 6/4/10. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/4/2010) |
Filing 153 ORDER Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte Granting in Part & Denying in Part re 84 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; Denying re 149 Motion to consider Plaintiff's expert reports. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2010) |
Filing 148 STIPULATION & ORDER re Pretrial Expert Case Management Deadlines Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 2/12/2010 re 147 Stipulation. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2010) |
Filing 144 ORDER GRANTING re 143 Application to Appear Telephonically at Hearing on Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Signed by Mag. Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 2/1/2010. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2010) |
Filing 130 ORDER Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte Granting in part & denying in part re 127 Administrative Motion for Leave to File an Opposition Brief in Excess of 25 Pages. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2010) |
Filing 126 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL by Judge Laporte (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/6/2010) |
Filing 122 ORDER GRANTING Jerome M. Varanini's Request to Appear by Telephone 114 . Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 1/4/2010. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2010) |
Filing 113 CORRECTED ORDER re 97 MOTION to Continue County Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Eric James Baker. Signed by Judge Laporte on 12/28/09. DISREGARD PRIOR DOCKET ENTRY FILED IN ERROR.(edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/28/2009) |
Filing 96 ORDER by Judge Laporte granting 77 Motion to Compel (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/21/2009) |
Filing 90 ORDER re 89 MOTION to Appear by Telephone at Hearing On Defendants' Motion to Compel filed by Eric James Baker. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on December 11, 2009. (edllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/11/2009) |
Filing 76 ORDER FOLLOWING FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge Laporte on 10/7/09. (edllc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2009) |
Filing 59 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte granting without prejudice 45 Motion to Strike ; denying 49 Motion for Leave to File; granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to Dismiss (hlk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/10/2009) |
Filing 36 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CASE DEADLINES: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint 30 and Initial Case Management Conference are continued to 1/27/2009 02:00 PM. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 11/18/08. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2008) |
Filing 29 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CASE DEADLINES re 26 . Initial Case Management Conference continued to 12/16/2008 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 10/28/08. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/28/2008) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.