Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited Featured Case
Plaintiff: Visto Corporation
Defendant: Research in Motion Limited
3rd Party Defendant: Google Inc.
Case Number: 3:2008mc80031
Filed: March 10, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of California
Presiding Judge: James Larson
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey S. White
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 31
ORDER RE: USE AND DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL 28 Stipulation filed by Visto Corporation. Signed by Judge James Larson on 4/8/08. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2008)
April 7, 2008 Filing 28
STIPULATION OF COUNSEL RE: USE AND DISCLOSURE OF DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED UNDER SEAL by Visto Corporation. (Kagay, Charles) (Filed on 4/7/2008)
April 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 26
ORDER GRANTING ADMININSTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE PORTIONS OF DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL re 17 MOTION to Seal Portions of Opposition to Google's Motion to Quash Subpoena, or in the Alternative, for Protective Order; Cross-Motion to Compel; and Supporting Robson Declaration filed by Visto Corporation, 20 Proposed Order,filed by Visto Corporation. Signed by Judge James Larson on 4/2/08. (jlsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/2/2008)
April 1, 2008 Filing 25
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Visto Corporation re 17 MOTION to Seal Portions of Opposition to Google's Motion to Quash Subpoena, or in the Alternative, for Protective Order; Cross-Motion to Compel; and Supporting Robson Declaration, 21 Memorandum in Opposition, 22 Declaration in Support,, and Related E-filings of March 31, 2008 (Kagay, Charles) (Filed on 4/1/2008)
March 31, 2008 Filing 24
Proposed Order re 1 MOTION to Quash by Visto Corporation. (Kagay, Charles) (Filed on 3/31/2008)
March 20, 2008 Filing 14
NOTICE of Appearance by Martin Cecil Robson, III (Robson, Martin) (Filed on 3/20/2008)
March 19, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 13
ORDER by Judge Jeffrey S. White granting 8 Motion for Pro Hac Vice for Martin C. Robson (jjo, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2008)
March 18, 2008 Filing 7
CLERK'S NOTICE Motion Hearing set for 4/23/2008 09:30 AM in Courtroom F, 15th Floor, San Francisco. (wh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2008)
March 13, 2008 Filing 6
NOTICE of Appearance by Charles M. Kagay on Behalf of Plaintiff Visto Corporation (Kagay, Charles) (Filed on 3/13/2008)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Visto Corporation v. Research in Motion Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Visto Corporation
Represented By: Charles M. Kagay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Research in Motion Limited
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: Google Inc.
Represented By: Khari Jamil Tillery
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?