Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc.
(What's this?)
What is the EasyEdit button?
This website gets better when people like you add to it. Just click the EasyEdit button to start. (help)
| Plaintiff: | Pulaski & Middleman, LLC |
|---|---|
| Defendant: | Google Inc. |
| Case Number: | 5:2008cv03888 |
| Filed: | August 14, 2008 |
| Court: | California Northern District Court |
| Office: | San Jose Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | San Francisco |
| Presiding Judge: | Hon. James Ware |
| Referring Judge: | Magistrate Judge Richard Seeborg |
| Nature of Suit: | Contract - Other Contract |
| Cause: | 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| Jurisdiction: | Diversity |
| Jury Demanded By: | Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
Some selected documents for this case are included below.
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| August 14, 2008 | 1 | CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT: JURY TRIAL DEMANDED against Google Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350.00, receipt number 34611022395.). Filed byPulaski & Middleman, LLC. (aaa, Court Staff) (Filed on 8/14/2008) (aaa, Court Staff). |
| August 14, 2008 | 2 |  ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 11/14/2008. Case Management Conference set for 11/21/2008 10:00 AM. Signed by Senior Judge Samuel Conti on 8/14/08. (Attachments: # 1 SC Standing Order, # 2 Standing Order)(aaa, Court Staff) (Filed on 8/14/2008) |
| August 14, 2008 | 3 | Summons Issued as to Google Inc. (aaa, Court Staff) (Filed on 8/14/2008) |
| August 15, 2008 | 4 | ORDER OF RECUSAL. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 8/15/08. (tdm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2008) |
| August 18, 2008 | 5 | ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Hon. Susan Illston for all further proceedings. Judge Hon. Samuel Conti no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Judge Samuel Conti on 8/18/08. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2008) |
| August 25, 2008 | 6 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC. Google Inc. served on 8/14/2008, answer due 9/3/2008. (Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 8/25/2008) |
| September 4, 2008 | 7 | STIPULATION to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint (Civil L.R. 6-1) by Google Inc.. (Norton, Leo) (Filed on 9/4/2008) |
| September 8, 2008 | 8 | CLERK'S NOTICE Case Management Conference set for 11/21/2008 02:00 PM. (Attachments: # 1 Standing Order) (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2008) |
| September 12, 2008 | 9 | NOTICE by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC of Association of Counsel (Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 9/12/2008) |
| September 19, 2008 | 10 | ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Relate Cases (jwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2008) |
| September 30, 2008 | 11 | Defendant Google Inc.'s ANSWER to Complaint byGoogle Inc.. (Norton, Leo) (Filed on 9/30/2008) |
| September 30, 2008 | 12 | NOTICE by Google Inc. Corporate Disclosure Statement (Norton, Leo) (Filed on 9/30/2008) |
| September 30, 2008 | 13 | Certificate of Interested Entities by Google Inc. (Norton, Leo) (Filed on 9/30/2008) |
| September 30, 2008 | 14 | NOTICE by Google Inc. Pendency of Other Action (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-1, # 2 Exhibit A-2)(Norton, Leo) (Filed on 9/30/2008) |
| September 30, 2008 | 15 | NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Graham Rhodes (Rhodes, Michael) (Filed on 9/30/2008) |
| October 1, 2008 | 16 | MOTION for leave to appear in Pro Hac Vice of Peter J. Willsey ( Filing fee $ 210, receipt number 54611003982.) filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 receipt, # 2 proposed order)(ys, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/1/2008) |
| October 7, 2008 | 17 | ORDER by Judge Illston granting 16 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/7/2008) |
| October 10, 2008 | 18 | Plaintiff's Statement in Response to 14 Notice of Pendency of Other Civil Action [Civil Local Rule 3-13(c)] filed byPulaski & Middleman, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)(Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 10/10/2008) Modified on 10/14/2008 (ys, COURT STAFF). |
| October 22, 2008 | 19 | NOTICE of Appearance by Peter Joel Willsey (Willsey, Peter) (Filed on 10/22/2008) |
| October 29, 2008 | 20 | STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Early Neutral Evaluation by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC (Saveri, Guido) (Filed on 10/29/2008) |
| October 29, 2008 | 21 | ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3-5 b) of discussion of ADR options Defendant Google Inc. (Norton, Leo) (Filed on 10/29/2008) |
| October 31, 2008 | 22 | ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge Illston on 10/30/08. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/31/2008) |
| November 3, 2008 | 23 | RELATED CASE ORDER. C-08-3369 JW, C-08-3452 RMW, C-08-4701 PVT and C-08-3888 SI ARE RELATED. The parties are to file a joint case management conference statement in their respective case dockets by 2/13/2009. Initial Case Management Conference set for 2/23/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. Signed by Judge James Ware on 11/3/2008. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/3/2008) |
| November 13, 2008 | 24 | ADR Clerk's Notice Setting ADR Phone Conference on 11/19/2008 at 2:30 p.m. Please note that Plaintiff's counsel should initiate the call. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/13/2008) |
| February 12, 2009 | 25 | CLERKS NOTICE Continuing Motion Hearing (34 in 08-cv-03369-JW Levitte v. Google Inc.); Continuing Case Management Conference in ALL RELATED cases from 2/23/2009 to 3/2/2009. Motion Hearing set for 3/2/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose. Joint Case Management Statement due by 2/20/2009 to be filed in each respective case docket. Case Management Conference in all related cases set for 3/2/2009 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. James Ware. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2009) |
| February 20, 2009 | 26 | CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT filed by Pulaski & Middleman, LLC. (Schubert, Dustin) (Filed on 2/20/2009) |
| February 25, 2009 | 27 | ORDER by Judge James Ware The Clerk of Court SHALL CONSOLIDATE C08-3369 JW, C08-3452 JW, C08-3888 JW, C08-4701 JW these actions such that the earlier filed action, C08-3369 JW, is the LEAD CASE. ALL future filings SHALL be in C08-3369 and bear the caption:"In re Google AdWords Litigation." In addition, the Clerk SHALL administratively close C08-3452 JW, C08-3888 JW and C08-4701 JW. Plaintiffs SHALL file and Amended Consolidated Complaint by 4/6/09 and Appointing Schubert Jonckheer Kolbe & Kralowec LLP Interim Class Counsel (jwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2009) Modified on 2/25/2009 (cv, COURT STAFF). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Pulaski & Middleman, LLC v. Google Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Pulaski & Middleman, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Google Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search Dockets | [ Dockets ] |
| Search Blogs | [ Justia BlawgSearch | BlawgSearch Google Co-op | Blawg.com | Bloglines | Feedster | Google Blogsearch | Technorati ] |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | MSN | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Justia Lawyer, Legal Aid & Services Directory: San Francisco County Business Lawyers and California Business Lawyers
The Justia Federal District Court Filings & Dockets site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.