e.Digital Corporation v. Pentax of America, Inc. et al
e.Digital Corporation |
Pentax of America, Inc., Hoya Corporation, Hoya Corporation USA, Canon USA, Inc., Canon Inc., Coby Electronics Corp., DXG Technology (U.S.A.), Inc., DXG Technology, Inc., HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Ikegami Electronics (USA), Inc., Imation Corporation, Kyocera Communications, Inc., Kyocera Wireless, Inc., Kyocera International, Inc., Kyocera Corporation, Leica Camera, Inc., Leica Camera AG, Marantz America, Inc., D&M Holdings U.S. Inc., D&M Holdings, Inc., Nokia, Inc., Nokia Corporation, Panasonic Corporation of North America, Panasonic Corporation, Summit Global Group, LLC, Roland Systems Group U.S., Roland Corporation, Sakar International, Inc., Samson Technologies Corp., Teac America, Inc., VTech Electronics North America, LLC and TIC Computer, Inc. |
1:2009cv02578 |
November 2, 2009 |
US District Court for the District of Colorado |
Denver Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Marcia S. Krieger |
Michael J. Watanabe |
Plaintiff |
35 U.S.C. ยง 0001 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 423 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. e.Digital Corporation's and Defendant Coby Electronics Corp.'s 421 Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Coby Electronics Corp. is GRANTED. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Pro cedure, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's claims for relief against Coby Electronics Corp. and Coby Electronics Corp.'s counterclaims against e.Digital Corporation are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees, costs and expenses. The Clerk is directed to close this case, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/26/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 419 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE. The 418 Motion Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendant Vtech Electronics North America, LLC is GRANTED and all claims and counterclaims asserted in this matter betw een Plaintiff, e.Digital Corporation, and Defendant, Vtech Electronics North America, LLC, are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees herein expended. All future captions shall so reflect, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/24/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 416 ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT SAMSON TECHNOLOGIES CORP. WITH PREJUDICE. The 414 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant Samson Technologies Corp. is GRANTED. All claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant Samson Technologies Corp. are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to pay his, her or its own costs and attorneys' fees herein expended. All future captions shall omit the aforementioned Defendant, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/20/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 411 ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS NOKIA INC. AND NOKIA CORPORATION. The 410 Joint Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice of Defendants Nokia Inc. And Nokia Corporation is GRANTED. Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's claims against Nokia Inc. And Nokia Corporation are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees herein expended. All future captions shall so reflect, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 10/11/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 409 ORDER GRANTING 408 JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANT SAKAR INTERNATIONAL, INC. Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's claims for relief against Sakar and Sakar's counterclaims against e.Digital are dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees, costs and expenses, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 09/12/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 407 ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE. The 405 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant Imation Corporation is GRANTED and Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's claims for relief against Imation in the above-styled action and Imation's counterclaims against e.Digital are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear his, her or its own costs and attorneys' fees herein expended, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 09/07/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 403 ORDER GRANTING 402 JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE OF DEFENDANTS HTC AMERICA, INC., AND HTC CORPORATION. Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's claims for relief against HTC in the above-styled action and HTC's counterclaims against e.Digital are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees, costs and expenses, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/31/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 401 ORDER granting 399 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendants Canon USA, Inc., and Canon Inc. Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's claims for relief against Canon and Canon's counterclaims against e.Digital be dismissed with prejudice. e.Digital's claims against all other named defendants in this action remain pending. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees, costs and expenses, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 08/17/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 395 OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 6/28/11. (msksec, ) |
Filing 393 ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS PENTAX OF AMERICA, INC., HOYA CORPORATION; AND HOYA CORPORATION USA WITH PREJUDICE. The 391 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant Pentax of America, Inc.; Hoya Corporation; and Hoya Corpo ration USA is GRANTED. All claims and counterclaims asserted between Plaintiff and Defendants Pentax of America, Inc.; Hoya Corporation; and Hoya Corporation USA are hereby dismissed, with prejudice, each party to pay his, her or its own costs and attorneys' fees herein expended. All future captions shall omit the aforementioned Defendants, by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 06/24/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 390 ORDER granting 389 Joint Motion to Dismiss Summit Technology Group, LLC and to Withdraw Defendant Summit Technology Group, LLC's Counterclaim. Plaintiff e.Digital's claims against Defendant Summit are dismissed, without prejudice, and that Defendant Summit's counterclaims against Plaintiff e.Digital are dismissed without prejudice. All future captions shall omit Summit Technology Group, LLC., by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 06/07/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 388 STIPULATED SUPPLEMENTAL PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR SOURCE CODE entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 6/6/2011. (mjwcd) |
Filing 377 ORDER granting 376 Joint Motion for Dismissal With Prejudice of Defendant Teac America, Inc., pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a)(2). Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's claims for relief against TEAC in this action is dismissed with prejudice. e.Di gital's claims against all other named defendants in this action remain pending. Each party shall bear its own attorney fees, costs and expenses. All future captions shall omit TEAC AMERICA, INC., by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 03/01/2011.(wjc, ) |
Filing 359 MINUTE ORDER denying 346 Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Amended Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/24/2011.(mjwcd) |
Filing 358 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 322 Plaintiff e.Digital Corporation's Motion to Compel Defendant Sakar International, Inc. to Provide Full and Complete Responses to Discovery Requests as set forth in the Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/18/2011.(mjwcd) |
Filing 339 TRIAL PREPARATION ORDER-CIVIL by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 12/15/10. (msksec, ) |
Filing 312 MINUTE ORDER denying 309 Defendants' Combined Motion for Protective Order to Reinstate the Stay of Discovery and Supporting Memorandum, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 9/17/2010.(mjwcd) |
Filing 306 Minute Entry for Law and Motion Hearing held before Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 7/30/2010. 298 Motion to Exclude is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. One day Markman Hearing set for 1/28/2011 08:30 AM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Other matters discussed and deadlines, if any, imposed are as set forth in the Minutes. (Court Reporter Paul Zuckerman) (mskcd) |
Filing 252 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 3/30/2010. (mjwcd) |
Filing 195 ORDER granting 185 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Withdraw its Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint. Withdrawing 178 Motion for Leave to Amend its Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 2/23/10.(gmssl, ) |
Filing 117 ORDER granting 114 Unopposed Motion for Counsel to Appear by Telephone; Conference call to be arranged by defense counsel so one call is placed to the court (303)844-2403 for the 1/20/2010 09:00 a.m. conference, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 1/14/2010.(mjwcd ) |
Filing 8 ORDER Setting Status Conference for 1/20/2010 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom A 502 before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/19/2009. (wjc, ) |
Filing 6 ORDER REGARDING CUSTODY OF EXHIBITS AND DEPOSITIONS USED IN EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS AND TRIALS: Any exhibits and depositions used during evidentiary hearings or trials, counsel for the parties shall retrieve the originals of such exhibits and deposition s from the Court following the evidentiary hearing or trial, and shall retain same for 60 days beyond the later of the time to appeal or conclusion of any appellate proceedings. The Court will retain its copy of the exhibits for the same time period after which the documents will be destroyed. by Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/6/09. (mskcd) |
Filing 3 ORDER SETTING HEARING UNDER FED.R.CIV.P. 16: Rule 16 Hearing set for 1/7/2010 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom A 901 before Judge Marcia S. Krieger. Judge Marcia S. Krieger on 11/4/09. (msksec, ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Colorado District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.