Sees the Ground v. Emerson et al
| Gordon Sees the Ground, Jr. |
| John Weaver, Orlando Rodriguez, Corrections Corporation of America, Lt. Worshing and C.C. Emerson |
| 4:2011cv00044 |
| June 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the District of Montana |
| Great Falls Office |
| CHOTEAU |
| Sam E Haddon |
| Keith Strong |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 49 in full. Defendants' 36 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 8/5/2013. Mailed to Sees the Ground. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER ADOPTING 31 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 29 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 11/6/2012. Mailed to Sees the Ground. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER ADOPTING 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Defendants Corrections Corporation of America and C.C. Emerson's 13 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 7/13/2012. Mailed to Sees the Ground. (TAG, )
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7 in full. All of Plaintiff's claims against Rodriguez, Wirsching, and Weaver and all procedural due process claims arising from Mr. Sees the Ground's disciplinary hearing are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 12/27/2011. Mailed to Sees the Ground. (TAG, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
