Redfern v. Montana Department of Corrections
Plaintiff: Martin Morris Redfern
Defendant: Montana Department of Corrections
Case Number: 4:2011cv00049
Filed: July 19, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Montana
Office: Great Falls Office
County: CHOTEAU
Presiding Judge: Sam E Haddon
Presiding Judge: Keith Strong
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 18, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER ADOPTING 20 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS in full. Defendants Janet Cox's and Sylvia Dubuisson's 9 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. Summary judgment as to Defendant Denise McNeeley is GRANTED. Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 5 is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Sam E Haddon on 4/18/2012. (TAG, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Montana District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redfern v. Montana Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Martin Morris Redfern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montana Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?