Anderson v. The State of New York et al
| Christine C. Anderson |
| The State of New York, The Office of Court Administration of Unified Court System, Hon. John Buckley, Thomas J. Cahill, Sherry K. Cohen, Catherine O'Hagen Wolfe and David Spokony |
| 1:2007cv09599 |
| October 26, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons in this Opinion and Order, plaintiff's amended motion for an Order pursuant to Rule 60(b) and (d)(3) is denied. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this motion (Docket Entry # 132). (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 10/2/2012) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
88
OPINION & ORDER re:# 97457 63 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by The State of New York, Sherry K. Cohen, The Office of Court Administration of Unified Court System, Thomas J. Cahill, David Spokony. For the reasons set forth herein, plaintiff' ;s discrimination claims are dismissed, as is her breach of contract claim. Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim remains. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close defendants' motion for summary judgment (Document #63). A status conference is scheduled for 5/8/09, at 5:30 p.m., in Courtroom 15C. (Signed by Judge Shira A. Scheindlin on 4/27/09) (tro) Modified on 4/30/2009 (jab).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
