Dow Chemical Canada v. HRD Corporation
| 1:2005cv00023 |
| January 18, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
901
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 887 MOTION For Attorneys' Fees and 896 MOTION For Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 7/29/2013. (ksr, )
|
|
Filing
874
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 481 Supplemental MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/19/2012. (nms)
|
|
Filing
872
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 790 MOTION for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 12/18/2012. (nms)
|
|
Filing
795
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 727 Exception to the Special Master's Ruling, and 707 Motion to Reopen Discovery. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 11/5/2012. (nms)
|
|
Filing
732
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 471 SEALED MOTION to Stay Execution of Sanctions Ruling Pending Appeal or Disposition of the Case on the Merits, or in the Alternative for Reconsideration, and 699 SEALED MOTION to Vacate 391 Sanctions Order. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/2/2012. (nms)
|
|
Filing
551
ORDER ADOPTING 526 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Special Master. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 4/21/2010. (nms)
|
|
Filing
548
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS found at 465 Report and Recommendations of the Special Master regarding Dow's Objections to HRD's Deposition Designations. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 4/12/2010. (nms)
|
|
Filing
470
MEMORANDUM ORDER Granting 408 MOTION for an Award of Specific Costs, filed by The Dow Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Company, Dow Chemical Canada Inc. (see Memorandum Order of further details). Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 1/5/2010. (nms)
|
|
Filing
464
ORDER ADOPTING 381 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Special Master re Dow's request for production. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 11/20/2009. (nms)
|
|
Filing
432
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Special Master regarding HRD Subpoenas. Objections to R&R due by 10/19/2009. Signed by Special Master B. Wilson Redfearn on 9/24/2009. (nms)
|
|
Filing
390
OPINION re 247 SEALED Motion For Discovery Abuse Sanctions. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 7/30/2009. (nms)
|
|
Filing
381
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Special Master regarding Dow's Request For Production (see D.I. 363,369, and 379) Objections to R&R due by 8/10/2009. Signed by Special Master B. Wilson Redfearn on 7/17/2009. (nms)
|
|
Filing
355
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Special Master regarding HRD's Motion To Compel Discovery Relative To Affinity Sales Objections to R&R due by 7/27/2009. Signed by Special Master B. Wilson Redfearn, Esq. on 7/2/2009. (nms)
|
|
Filing
277
ORDER ADOPTING 221 Report and Recommendations of Special Master. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 4/30/2009. (nms)
|
|
Filing
221
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Special Master re 198 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer and Counterclaims filed by HRD Corporation Objections to R&R due by 3/23/2009. Signed by Special Master B. Wilson Redfearn on 2/26/2009. (nms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dow Chemical Canada v. HRD Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
