TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation
| 1:2005cv00747 |
| October 25, 2005 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Sue L. Robinson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
463
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 451 MOTION Rule 60(b) for Relief from the Court's April 30, 2009 Order and Motion for Contempt re 430 Order, filed by TruePosition Inc. On or before May 18, 2010, defendant shall remit to the court and opposing counsel an itemization of its costs in defending the present motion. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 5/4/2010. (nmf)
|
|
Filing
443
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-defendant to remit to plaintiff cost and fees as stated in order. Clerk to enter judgment in favor of plaintiff. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 6/10/2009. (lid) Modified on 9/9/2009 (lid).
|
|
Filing
429
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 4/30/2009. (nmf)
|
|
Filing
389
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 375 MOTION to Amend/Correct 374 Order, with Respect to Pre-Judgment and Post-Judgment Interest. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 1/26/2009. (nmf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: TruePosition Inc. v. Andrew Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
