Hsu v. Great Seneca Financial Corp. et al
| 1:2006cv00401 |
| June 23, 2006 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| Mary Pat Thynge |
| Vacant Judgeship |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM ORDER -- the Memorandum Order of 1/5/09 is amended as follows: defendants' motion to dismiss 37 , including the issues raised under 15 U.S.C. 1692g(b), is GRANTED; plaintiff's motion for certification for an interlocutory appeal 46 is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 9/21/09. Associated Cases: 1:06-cv-00401-MPT, 1:08-cv-00293-MPT(ntl)
|
|
Filing
52
MEMORANDUM OPINION defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED and Hsu's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 9/18/2009. (cak)
|
|
Filing
45
MEMORANDUM ORDER: Defendants' motion to dismiss 37 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. (1) Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint's claim for violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(b) is DENIED. (2) Defendants motion to dismiss the remaining claims of the amended complaint is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 1/5/2009. (cak)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hsu v. Great Seneca Financial Corp. et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
