United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing , Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers, International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. NVF Company

Plaintiff: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing , Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers, International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant: NVF Company
Case Number: 1:2009cv00195
Filed: March 23, 2009
Court: Delaware District Court
Office: Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations Office
County: New Castle
Presiding Judge: Unassigned Judge
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 29:185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing , Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers, International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. NVF Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing , Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers, International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Represented By: Susan E. Kaufman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NVF Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.