Rader v. ING Bank fsb et al
| Larry W. Rader |
| ING Bank fsb and ShareBuilder Securities Corporation |
| 1:2009cv00340 |
| May 12, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Unassigned Judge |
| None |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
133
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 9/30/11. (ntl)
|
|
Filing
130
MEMORANDUM ORDER Denying re (119 in 1:09-cv-00340-LPS) MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Larry W. Rader, (33 in 1:10-cv-00398-LPS) MOTION for Reconsideration re (32) Order, (31) Memorandum Opinion filed by Larry W. Rader. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/18/11. Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00340-LPS, 1:10-cv-00398-LPS(ntl)
|
|
Filing
94
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying (89 in 1:09-cv-00340-SLR -LPS) MOTION Relief from Order re (88) Adopting Report and Recommendations filed by Larry W. Rader, denying (35 in 1:09-cv-00781-SLR -LPS) MOTION filed by Larry W. Rader, denying (85 in 1:09-cv-00544-SLR -LPS) MOTION Relief from Order re (88) Adopting Report and Recommendations filed by Larry W. Rader. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 8/24/2010. Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00340-SLR -LPS, 1:09-cv-00544-SLR -LPS, 1:09-cv-00781-SLR -LPS(nmf)
|
|
Filing
88
MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT (i) in 09-340-SLR-LPS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (D.I. 54) be DENIED, Defendants motion for Rule 11 sanctions (D.I. 68) be DENIED, Defendants motion to strike Plaintiffs answering brief in opposition to motion for sanctions (D.I. 75) be DENIED, and Defendants motion for partial summary judgment (D.I. 48) be GRANTED; (ii) in 09-544-SLR-LPS Defendants motions to dismiss (D.I. 8, D.I. 13, D.I. 66) be GRANTED, Defendants motion fo r Rule 11 sanctions (D.I. 27, D.I. 68) be DENIED, ING Groep, N.V.s motion to set aside the Default in Appearance (D.I. 42) be GRANTED, and Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against ING Groep, N.V. (D.I. 22, D.I. 29) be DENIED; and (iii) in 09-781-SLR-LPS Defendants motions to dismiss (D.I. 4, D.I. 8) be GRANTED, and Defendants motion for Rule 11 sanctions (D.I. 15) be DENIED AND ORDER THAT in 09-340-SLR-LPS Plaintiffs motion for a protective order and motion for sanctions (D.I. 26) is DENIED, Plaintiffs motion to quash subpoena and for sanctions (D.I. 27) is DENIED, Defendants motion to strike Plaintiffs motion for protective order and motion to quash (D.I. 30) is DENIED, Defendants motion to compel discovery (D.I. 42) is DENIE D, Plaintiffs motion to disqualify Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP (D.I. 44) is DENIED, and Defendants motion for discovery sanctions for Plaintiffs failure to appear at his deposition (D.I. 62) is GRANTED, IN 09-544-SLR-LPS Raders motion for extension of time to file a response as to motion for sanctions (D.I. 32) is DENIED AS MOOT, Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendants motion for sanctions (D.I. 37) is DENIED, Plaintiffs motion to strike the motion to set aside the default judgmen t (D.I. 44) is DENIED, Plaintiffs motion to disqualify Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP and for sanctions (D.I. 49) is DENIED.(79 in 1:09-cv-00340-SLR-LPS, 75 in 1:09-cv-00544-SLR-LPS, 26 in 1:09-cv-00781-SLR-LPS). Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 6/10/2010. Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00340-SLR-LPS, 1:09-cv-00544-SLR-LPS, 1:09-cv-00781-SLR-LPS(nmf)
|
|
Filing
79
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THAT (i) in 09-340-SLR-LPS Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment (D.I. 54) be DENIED, Defendants motion for Rule 11 sanctions (D.I. 68) be DENIED, Defendants motion to strike Plaintiffs answering brief in opposition to moti on for sanctions (D.I. 75) be DENIED, and Defendants motion for partial summary judgment (D.I. 48) be GRANTED; (ii) in 09-544-SLR-LPS Defendants motions to dismiss (D.I. 8, D.I. 13, D.I. 66) be GRANTED, Defendants motion for Rule 11 sanctions (D.I. 2 7, D.I. 68) be DENIED, ING Groep, N.V.s motion to set aside the Default in Appearance (D.I. 42) be GRANTED, and Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment against ING Groep, N.V. (D.I. 22, D.I. 29) be DENIED; and (iii) in 09-781-SLR-LPS Defendant s motions to dismiss (D.I. 4, D.I. 8) be GRANTED, and Defendants motion for Rule 11 sanctions (D.I. 15) be DENIED AND ORDER THAT in 09-340-SLR-LPS Plaintiffs motion for a protective order and motion for sanctions (D.I. 26) is DENIED, Plaintiffs motio n to quash subpoena and for sanctions (D.I. 27) is DENIED, Defendants motion to strike Plaintiffs motion for protective order and motion to quash (D.I. 30) is DENIED, Defendants motion to compel discovery (D.I. 42) is DENIED, Plaintiffs motion to dis qualify Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP (D.I. 44) is DENIED, and Defendants motion for discovery sanctions for Plaintiffs failure to appear at his deposition (D.I. 62) is GRANTED, IN 09-544-SLR-LPS Raders motion for extension of time to f ile a response as to motion for sanctions (D.I. 32) is DENIED AS MOOT, Plaintiffs motion to strike Defendants motion for sanctions (D.I. 37) is DENIED, Plaintiffs motion to strike the motion to set aside the default judgment (D.I. 44) is DENIED, Plai ntiffs motion to disqualify Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP and for sanctions (D.I. 49) is DENIED, AND THAT all proceedings in 09-340-SLR-LPS, 09-544-SLR-LPS, AND 09-781-SLR-LPS are STAYED until further order of the Court, with the except ion that the parties may file and brief objections to any portion of the instant Report and Recommendation and Order. The parties are directed to the Courts Standing Order In Non-Pro Se Matters For Objections Filed Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 72, dated Nov ember 16, 2009, a copy of which is available on the Courts website, www.ded.uscourts.gov/StandingOrdersMain.htm. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. ( Objections to R&R due by 4/26/2010 ).. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 4/7/2010. Associated Cases: 1:09-cv-00340-SLR-LPS, 1:09-cv-00544-SLR-LPS, 1:09-cv-00781-SLR-LPS(rpg)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
