Enhanced Security Research LLC v. Cisco Systems Inc. et al
| Enhanced Security Research LLC |
| Cisco Systems Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Check Point Software Technologies Ltd., Check Point Software Technologies Inc., SonicWALL Inc., 3Com Corporation, Nokia Corporation, Nokia Inc., Fortinet Inc. and Sourcefire Inc. |
| 1:2009cv00390 |
| May 29, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Unassigned Judge |
| Plaintiff |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
MEMORANDUM OPINION re 54 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter, and MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to Join a Party, 58 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter, and Motion For Failure to Join an Indispensable Party, 62 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter And Failure To Join An Indespensable Party And Joinder In Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc.'s And 3Com Corporation's Motion To Dismiss, 70 MOTION to Consolidate Cases, 100 MOTION to Stay Pending Outcome of Reexamination Proceedings, and 141 MOTION to Supplement the Record on 100 MOTION to Stay Pending Outcome of Reexamination Proceedings. Signed by Judge Joseph J. Farnan, Jr. on 6/25/2010. (nms)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
