Intel Corporation v. Future Link Systems LLC
| Intel Corporation |
| Future Link Systems LLC |
| 1:2014cv00377 |
| March 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Leonard P. Stark |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
640
MEMORANDUM ORDER re trial format. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 7/31/2017. (etg)
|
|
Filing
378
MEMORANDUM OPINION re claim construction. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/2/16. (ntl)
|
|
Filing
274
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION recommending GRANTING-IN-PART and DENYING-IN-PART D.I. 99 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [Future Link Systems' Motion to Dismiss Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, XV, XVII, XIX, and XX of Inte l's First Amended Complaint for Declaratory Judgment] filed by Future Link Systems LLC., and recommending GRANTING D.I. 176 MOTION to Dismiss Based upon Counts I, III, V, VII, IX, XI, XIII, and XV of Intel's Counterclaims filed b y Future Link Systems LLC. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 4/18/2016. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 3/31/2016. (mlc)
|
|
Filing
153
MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding early summary judgment proceedings; the August 7, 2015 teleconference is cancelled. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 8/5/15. (ntl)
|
|
Filing
81
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending GRANTING-IN-PART D.I. 8 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Over the Subject Matter MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Future Link Systems LLC. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 3/2/2015. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/12/2015. (dlk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Intel Corporation v. Future Link Systems LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Intel Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Jack B. Blumenfeld |
| Represented By: | Maryellen Noreika |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Future Link Systems LLC | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Farnan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
