Kaavo Inc. v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Plaintiff: Kaavo Inc.
Defendant: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Case Number: 1:2014cv01192
Filed: September 15, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Delaware
Office: Wilmington Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Christopher J. Burke
Presiding Judge: Leonard P. Stark
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. ยง 271
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 44 MEMORANDUM ORDER re 42 in 1:14-cv-01193-LPS-CJB, 35 in 1:14-cv-01192-LPS-CJB REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ADOPTED in all respects; (14 in 1:14-cv-01192-LPS-CJB) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings, and (19 in 1:14-cv-01193-LPS-CJB) MOTION t o Dismiss are GRANTED as to claims 1, 12, 13, 24, and 35 of the '974 patent and DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renew in connection with motions for summary judgment as to all remaining dependent claims of the '974 patent. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 3/31/16. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-01192-LPS-CJB, 1:14-cv-01193-LPS-CJB (ntl)
February 5, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re D.I. (19 in 1:14-cv-01193-LPS-CJB) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Allege Infringement of a Patentable Claim Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 filed by Appfog Inc., TIER 3, INC., Savvis Communications Corporation, and D.I. (14 in 1:14-cv-01192-LPS-CJB) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. Please note that when filing Objections p ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), briefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 2/22/2016. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/5/2016. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-01192-LPS-CJB, 1:14-cv-01193-LPS-CJB(dlk)
April 9, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER D.I. (21 in 1:14-cv-01193-LPS-CJB) MOTION to Stay re (19) MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Allege Infringement of a Patentable Claim Under 35 U.S.C. § 1 01 filed by Appfog Inc., TIER 3, INC., Savvis Communications Corporation, adn D.I. (15 in 1:14-cv-01192-LPS-CJB) MOTION for Joinder in AppFog's Motion to Stay Pending Resolution of Motion to Dismiss on Section 101 Grounds filed by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/9/2015. Associated Cases: 1:14-cv-01192-LPS-CJB, 1:14-cv-01193-LPS-CJB(dlk)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kaavo Inc. v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kaavo Inc.
Represented By: Stamatios Stamoulis
Represented By: Richard Charles Weinblatt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation
Represented By: Karen Jacobs
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?