Two-Way Media Ltd. v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al
| Two-Way Media Ltd. |
| Verizon Communications Inc., Verizon Services Corp. and Verizon Online LLC |
| 1:2014cv01212 |
| September 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| XX US, Outside State |
| Richard G. Andrews |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
MEMORANDUM ORDER: The Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 12 ) is Dismissed as moot. The Report and Recommendation (D.I. 20 ) has been Considered, but the issue of its Adoption is moot. The request for leave to file a Third Amended Complaint (D.I. 21 ) is Granted. Plaintiff should separately file the "clean copy" of the Third Amended Complaint with the Clerk. Signed by Judge Richard G. Andrews on 8/10/2015. (nms)
|
|
Filing
20
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 12 GRANTING MOTION to Dismiss filed by Verizon Online LLC, Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Communications Inc.. Please note that when filing Objections pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(2), br iefing consists solely of the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages) and the Response to the Objections (no longer than ten (10) pages). No further briefing shall be permitted with respect to objections without leave of the Court. Objections to R&R due by 6/4/2015. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 5/18/15. (kjk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
