Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc.
| Evolved Wireless, LLC |
| Apple Inc. |
| 1:2015cv00542 |
| June 25, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Sue L. Robinson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
542
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - that 1. The plaintiffs motion for judgment as a matter of law (D.I. 528 ) is denied. 2. A final judgment on the jury verdict will be entered. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 8/9/19. (rwc)
|
|
Filing
510
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 3/28/2019. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00542-JFB-SRF et al.(nmg)
|
|
Filing
498
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER - 1. Defendant Apple Inc.s motion to preclude testimony of Dr. Jonathan D. Putnam is denied; 2. Defendants joint motion to preclude testimony of Dr. Jonathan D. Putnam is denied. 3. Defendant Apple Inc.s motion to preclude the t estimony of Dr. Todor Cooklev is denied. 4. Plaintiff Evolved Wireless LLCs motion to preclude the defendants experts is granted in part and denied in part as set forth in this order. (SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS)*********re (264 in 1:15-cv-00547-JFB-SRF, 278 in 1:15-cv-00542-JFB-SRF, 290 in 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF, 254 in 1:15-cv-00544-JFB-SRF, 256 in 1:15-cv-00546-JFB-SRF, 285 in 1:15-cv-00543-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Putnam Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 (Defendants' J oint Motion) filed by Nokia Inc., Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Microsoft Mobile Oy, ZTE (USA) Inc., Apple Inc., HTC America Inc., Microsoft Corporation, HTC Corporation, Samsung Electronics America Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC , (275 in 1:15-cv-00542-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Dr. Putnam Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 filed by Apple Inc., (287 in 1:15-cv-00543-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Dr. Cooklev Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 and 403 filed by HTC America Inc., HTC Corporation, (280 in 1:15-cv-00542-JFB-SRF, 256 in 1:15-cv-00544-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Dr. Cooklev Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 and 403 filed by Apple Inc., Motorola Mo bility LLC, (290 in 1:15-cv-00543-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Defendants' Experts filed by Evolved Wireless, LLC, (258 in 1:15-cv-00544-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Defendant's Experts filed by Evolved Wireless, LLC, (295 in 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Defendants' Experts filed by Evolved Wireless, LLC, (258 in 1:15-cv-00546-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Exclude Testimony of Dr. Cooklev Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 702 and 403 filed by ZTE (USA) Inc., (389 in 1:15-cv-00543-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Strike Supplemental Expert Report of Jonathan D. Putnam filed by HTC America Inc., HTC Corporation, (352 in 1:15-cv-00544-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Strike Supplemental Ex pert Report of Jonathan D. Putnam filed by Motorola Mobility LLC, (261 in 1:15-cv-00546-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Defendant's Experts filed by Evolved Wireless, LLC, (292 in 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF) MOTION [DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR. COOKLEV PURSUANT TO FED. R. EVID. 702 AND 403] filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., (283 in 1:15-cv-00542-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Preclude Defendant's Experts filed by Evolved Wireless, LLC, (389 in 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Strike Supplemental Expert Report of Jonathan D. Putnam filed by Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Samsung Electronics America Inc., (354 in 1:15-cv-00546-JFB-SRF) MOTION to Strike Supplemental Expert Report of Jonathan D. Putnam filed by ZTE (USA) Inc.. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 3/12/19. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00542-JFB-SRF et al.(rwc)
|
|
Filing
490
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 3/7/2019. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00542-JFB-SRF, 1:15-cv-00545-JFB-SRF(nmg)
|
|
Filing
468
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 2/21/2019. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00543-JFB-SRF et al.(nmg)
|
|
Filing
453
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: Defendant Apple's Motion to Strike Supplemental Expert Report of Jonathan D. Putnam is DENIED (*see Order for further details). Signed by Judge Joseph F. Bataillon on 2/14/2019. (ceg)
|
|
Filing
110
MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding claim construction. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 11/14/2016. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00542-SLR-SRF et al.(fms)
|
|
Filing
104
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Sue L. Robinson on 10/31/2016. Associated Cases: 1:15-cv-00542-SLR-SRF et al.(nmfn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Evolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Evolved Wireless, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Brian E. Farnan |
| Represented By: | Andrea L. Gothing |
| Represented By: | Christopher K. Larus |
| Represented By: | Ryan M. Schultz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Apple Inc. | |
| Represented By: | David Ellis Moore |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
