VLSI Technology LLC v. Intel Corporation
| VLSI Technology LLC |
| Intel Corporation |
| 1:2018cv00966 |
| June 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Delaware |
| Wilmington Office |
| New Castle |
| Vacant Judgeship (2017) |
| Christopher J Burke |
| Colm F Connolly |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORAL ORDER: In the interest of judicial economy, the hearing scheduled for December 14, 2022 at 1:00 p.m. is postponed and will be rescheduled after the Federal Circuit has ruled on the pending petitions for writs of mandamus in In re Creekview IP LLC, Appeal No. 23-108 (Fed. Cir.) and In re Waverly Licensing LLC, Appeal No. 23-109 (Fed. Cir.). The parties may submit no later than January 13, 2023 responsive briefing (limited to 7,500 words) to the memoranda filed on December 2, 2022 (i.e., D.I. #990 and D.I. #992 ). Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/12/2022. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 997
REDACTED VERSION of #991 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-10)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 996
REDACTED VERSION of #990 MEMORANDUM in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 995
DECLARATION re #992 Response to Order of Charlotte J. Wen by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 994
DECLARATION re #992 Response to Order of Lawrence A. Hamermesh by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 993
DECLARATION re #992 Response to Order of Bruce A. Green by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 992
RESPONSE to Order re #988 Memorandum and Order, Set Hearings filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 991
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #990 MEMORANDUM in Support, -- Declaration of Gregory Lantier -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-10)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 990
[SEALED] MEMORANDUM in Support -- Defendant Intel Corporation's Supplemental Brief Regarding Disclosure Statements Required By Standing Order -- filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 12/16/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-10)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 989
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas G. Saunders - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #989 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas G. Saunders, filed by Intel Corporation. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/17/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 988
MEMORANDUM ORDER Setting Hearings: An Oral Argument is set for 12/14/2022 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/17/2022. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 987
REDACTED VERSION of #982 Declaration by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-F)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 986
REDACTED VERSION of #981 Response to Objections by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 985
Joint STATUS REPORT in Response to The Court's June 2, 2022 Oral Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 984
REDACTED VERSION of #979 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 983
REDACTED VERSION of #978 Objections by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 982
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #981 Response to Objections by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 981
[SEALED] RESPONSE TO OBJECTIONS by VLSI Technology LLC re #978 Objections . (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 980
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Christine E. Duh as co-counsel. Reason for request: leaving the firm. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 979
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #978 Objections -- Declaration of Amanda L. Major -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 978
[SEALED] OBJECTIONS by Intel Corporation to #976 Statement -- Intel Corporation's Objection to VLSI Technology LLC's Response to the Court's August 1, 2022 Order --. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 977
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Adina Stohl as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 976
STATEMENT re #975 Memorandum and Order,, Case Stayed, Plaintiff's Response to Court's August 1, 2022 Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 975
MEMORANDUM ORDER. The Declaration of Michael Stolarski (D.I. #972 ) is UNSEALED, the redacted version of that declaration (D.I. #974 ) is STRUCK, and the case is STAYED until VLSI complies with the Court's April 18, 2022 Standing Order Regarding Disclosure Statements Required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1. CASE STAYED. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/1/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 974
THIS HAS BEEN STRUCK FROM THE RECORD - SEE D.I. #975 - REDACTED VERSION of #972 Declaration by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian) Modified on 8/3/2022 (nmf).
|
|
Filing 973
DECLARATION re Oral Order, Oral Order, -- Declaration of Thomas Herrgott -- by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 972
DECLARATION re Oral Order, Oral Order, of Michael Stolarski by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian) Modified on 8/1/2022 (kmd).
|
|
ORAL ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that each party shall certify by a sworn declaration filed with the Court no later than July 18, 2022 that it has complied with the Court's April 18, 2022 Standing Order Regarding Third-Party Litigation Funding Arrangements. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/11/2022. (nmf)
|
|
ORAL ORDER: It is HEREBY ORDERED that each party shall certify by a sworn declaration filed with the Court no later than July 18, 2022 that it has complied with the Court's April 18, 2022 Standing Order Regarding Disclosure Statements Required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/11/2022. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 971
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting-in-part and denying-in-part #787 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/27/2022. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 970
STATEMENT re #969 Notice (Other) Plaintiff's Response to Intel Corporation's Notice of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 969
NOTICE of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense by Intel Corporation (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 968
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' May 31, 2022 status report, (D.I. 967), hereby ORDERS that by September 1, 2022, the parties will provide a joint status update to the Court regarding the '026 patent IPR appeals and any request to lift the stay. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/2/2022. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 967
Joint STATUS REPORT by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 966
REDACTED VERSION of #961 Notice (Other) by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 965
SO ORDERED, re #964 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit the redacted version of VLSI's Second Notice of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense to 5/12/2022, filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/28/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 964
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit the redacted version of VLSI's Second Notice of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense to 5/12/2022 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 963
REDACTED VERSION of #956 Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 962
REDACTED VERSION of #955 Notice (Other) by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 961
[SEALED] Second NOTICE of Subsequent Developments in Connection with Intel's License Defense by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 960
SO ORDERED, re #959 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadline to submit the redacted versions of VLSI's Notice of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense and Intel's Response thereto to 4/27/2022, filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/14/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 959
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadline to submit the redacted versions of VLSI's Notice of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense and Intel's Response thereto to 4/27/2022 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 958
SO ORDERED, re #957 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit the redacted version of VLSI's Notice of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense to 4/13/2022, filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/31/2022. (kmd)
|
|
CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Thynge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Pursuant to the Court's #Standing Order No. 2022-2, dated March 14, 2022, "[u]nless otherwise directed by the Court, Magistrate Judges will no longer engage in alternative dispute resolution of patent and securities cases." See also 28 U.S.C. 652(b). (Taylor, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 957
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit the redacted version of VLSI's Notice of Subsequent Development in Connection with Intel's License Defense to 4/13/2022 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 956
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #955 Notice (Other) -- Response to Notice of Subsequent Developments -- by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 955
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subsequent Developments by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 954
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Brian E. Farnan regarding Oral Argument on Summary Judgment and Daubert Motions. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 953
REDACTED VERSION of #904 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 6-11)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 952
REDACTED VERSION of #903 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 951
REDACTED VERSION of #912 Declaration of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 950
REDACTED VERSION of #911 Reply Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 949
REDACTED VERSION of #908 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 948
REDACTED VERSION of #907 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 947
REDACTED VERSION of #906 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 946
REDACTED VERSION of #905 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 945
REDACTED VERSION of #902 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 13-14)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 944
REDACTED VERSION of #901 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 943
REDACTED VERSION of #900 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 942
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Request for Oral Argument - re #804 MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License (No. 1), #791 MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony contrary to the Court's Claim Construction Order, #803 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 of No Indirect or Willful Infringement, and No Enhanced Damages, #799 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 that it is Licensed to the Asserted Patents, #820 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 4 of No Direct Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331, #790 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. , #819 MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Intel Damages Experts Mr. Drew Pascarella, Dr. Robert Colwell, and Mr. Hance Huston, #812 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 of No Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Allegations for U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331, #811 MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Unsupported Affirmative Defenses (No. 2), #796 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Mark Chandler , #787 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte . (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 941
REDACTED VERSION of #899 Declaration of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 940
REDACTED VERSION of #898 Reply Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 939
REDACTED VERSION of #897 Statement by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 938
REDACTED VERSION of #896 Reply Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 937
REDACTED VERSION of #910 Statement, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Iian D. Jablon, #2 Exhibits 1-6)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 936
REDACTED VERSION of #909 Reply Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 935
REDACTED VERSION of #862 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-12)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 934
REDACTED VERSION of #861 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 933
REDACTED VERSION of #875 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exs. A-S)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 932
REDACTED VERSION of #874 Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 931
REDACTED VERSION of #873 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 930
REDACTED VERSION of #884 Declaration, of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits R1-R6)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 929
REDACTED VERSION of #883 Answering Brief in Opposition by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 928
REDACTED VERSION of #882 Declaration, of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits R1-R10)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 927
REDACTED VERSION of #881 Answering Brief in Opposition by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 926
REDACTED VERSION of #878 Statement,, Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Iian D. Jablon, #2 Exhibits R1-R13)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 925
REDACTED VERSION of #876 Answering Brief in Opposition by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 924
REDACTED VERSION of #872 Statement, Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 4 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibits R1-R7)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 923
REDACTED VERSION of #871 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 922
REDACTED VERSION of #870 Statement, Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 3 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibits R1-R3)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 921
REDACTED VERSION of #869 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 920
REDACTED VERSION of #868 Statement,,, Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 2 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibits R1-R29)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 919
REDACTED VERSION of #867 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 918
REDACTED VERSION of #866 Declaration,,, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits R1-R38)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 917
REDACTED VERSION of #865 Answering Brief in Opposition by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 916
REDACTED VERSION of #880 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 915
REDACTED VERSION of #879 Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 914
REDACTED VERSION of #877 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 913
REDACTED VERSION of #863 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 912
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #911 Reply Brief of S. Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 911
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #819 MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Intel Damages Experts Mr. Drew Pascarella, Dr. Robert Colwell, and Mr. Hance Huston filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 910
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #909 Reply Brief VLSI's Responses in Further Support of VLSI's Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Iian D. Jablon, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 909
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #804 MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License (No. 1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 908
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #820 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 4 of No Direct Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 907
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #812 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 of No Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Allegations for U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 906
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #803 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 of No Indirect or Willful Infringement, and No Enhanced Damages filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 905
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #799 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 that it is Licensed to the Asserted Patents filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 904
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #903 Reply Brief -- Declaration of Thomas F. Lampert -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 6-11)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 903
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #796 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Mark Chandler filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 902
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #901 Reply Brief -- Declaration of Thomas F. Lampert -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 13-14)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 901
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #790 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 900
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #787 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 899
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #898 Reply Brief of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 898
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #791 MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony contrary to the Court's Claim Construction Order filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 897
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #896 Reply Brief VLSI's Responses in Further Support of VLSI's Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Unsupported Affirmative Defenses by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 896
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #811 MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Unsupported Affirmative Defenses (No. 2) filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 895
SO ORDERED, re #893 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on February 15, 2022 to March 9, 2022, filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/1/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 894
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' March 1, 2022 status report, (D.I. 892), hereby ORDERS that by June 1, 2022, the parties will provide a joint status update to the Court regarding the '026 patent IPR appeals and any request to lift the stay. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 3/1/2022. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 893
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on February 15, 2022 to March 9, 2022 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 892
Joint STATUS REPORT in Response to The Court's December 2, 2021 Oral Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 891
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Steven Lieberman and Rachel M. Echols as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf of the redacted document and exhibit at D.I. #839 have been replaced with corrected versions per request of filer. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 890
SO ORDERED, re #889 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on February 15, 2022 to March 1, 2022, filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/23/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 889
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on February 15, 2022 to March 1, 2022 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 888
DECLARATION re #881 Answering Brief in Opposition, #865 Answering Brief in Opposition, #876 Answering Brief in Opposition, #871 Answering Brief in Opposition, #867 Answering Brief in Opposition, #883 Answering Brief in Opposition, #869 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Ryan Sullivan by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 887
DECLARATION re #877 Answering Brief in Opposition, #881 Answering Brief in Opposition, #865 Answering Brief in Opposition, #871 Answering Brief in Opposition, #867 Answering Brief in Opposition, #883 Answering Brief in Opposition, #869 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Mark Chandler by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 886
DECLARATION re #881 Answering Brief in Opposition, #865 Answering Brief in Opposition, #876 Answering Brief in Opposition, #871 Answering Brief in Opposition, #867 Answering Brief in Opposition, #883 Answering Brief in Opposition, #869 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Thomas Conte by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 885
DECLARATION re #881 Answering Brief in Opposition, #865 Answering Brief in Opposition, #876 Answering Brief in Opposition, #871 Answering Brief in Opposition, #867 Answering Brief in Opposition, #883 Answering Brief in Opposition, #869 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Murali Annavaram by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 884
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #883 Answering Brief in Opposition of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit R-1, #2 Exhibit R-2, #3 Exhibit R-3, #4 Exhibit R-4, #5 Exhibit R-5, #6 Exhibit R-6)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 883
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #796 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Mark Chandler filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 882
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #881 Answering Brief in Opposition of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit R-1, #2 Exhibit R-2, #3 Exhibit R-3, #4 Exhibit R-4, #5 Exhibit R-5, #6 Exhibit R-6, #7 Exhibit R-7, #8 Exhibit R-8, #9 Exhibit R-9, #10 Exhibit R-10)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 881
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #790 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 880
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #877 Answering Brief in Opposition, -- Declaration of Gregory Lantier -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 879
[SEALED] Counter STATEMENT re #816 Statement, in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Affirmative Defenses (Summary Judgment Motion #2) by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 878
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #801 Statement Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 1 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Iian D. Jablon, #2 Exhibit R-1, #3 Exhibit R-2, #4 Exhibit R-3, #5 Exhibit R-4, #6 Exhibit R-5, #7 Exhibit R-6, #8 Exhibit R-7, #9 Exhibit R-8, #10 Exhibit R-9, #11 Exhibit R-10, #12 Exhibit R-11, #13 Exhibit R-12, #14 Exhibit R-13)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 877
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #811 MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Unsupported Affirmative Defenses (No. 2) filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 876
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #799 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 that it is Licensed to the Asserted Patents filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 875
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #873 Answering Brief in Opposition, -- Declaration of Gregory Lantier -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-S)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 874
[SEALED] Counter STATEMENT re #810 Statement,,, of Facts in Support of Its Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License (Summary Judgment Motion #1) by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 873
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #804 MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License (No. 1) filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 872
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #823 Statement Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 4 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibit R-1, #3 Exhibit R-2, #4 Exhibit R-3, #5 Exhibit R-4, #6 Exhibit R-5, #7 Exhibit R-6, #8 Exhibit R-7)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 871
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #820 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 4 of No Direct Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 870
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #815 Statement Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 3 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibit R-1, #3 Exhibit R-2, #4 Exhibit R-3)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 869
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #812 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 of No Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Allegations for U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 868
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #867 Answering Brief in Opposition, Plaintiff's Responsive Concise Statement of Facts in Opposition to Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment No. 2 by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibit R-1, #3 Exhibit R-2, #4 Exhibit R-3, #5 Exhibit R-4, #6 Exhibit R-5, #7 Exhibit R-6, #8 Exhibit R-7, #9 Exhibit R-8, #10 Exhibit R-9, #11 Exhibit R-10, #12 Exhibit R-11, #13 Exhibit R-12, #14 Exhibit R-13, #15 Exhibit R-14, #16 Exhibit R-15, #17 Exhibit R-16, #18 Exhibit R-17, #19 Exhibit R-18, #20 Exhibit R-19, #21 Exhibit R-20, #22 Exhibit R-21, #23 Exhibit R-22, #24 Exhibit R-23, #25 Exhibit R-24, #26 Exhibit R-25, #27 Exhibit R-26, #28 Exhibit R-27, #29 Exhibit R-28, #30 Exhibit R-29)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 867
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #803 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 of No Indirect or Willful Infringement, and No Enhanced Damages filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 866
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #865 Answering Brief in Opposition of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit R-1, #2 Exhibit R-2, #3 Exhibit R-3, #4 Exhibit R-4, #5 Exhibit R-5, #6 Exhibit R-6, #7 Exhibit R-7, #8 Exhibit R-8, #9 Exhibit R-9, #10 Exhibit R-10, #11 Exhibit R-11, #12 Exhibit R-12, #13 Exhibit R-13, #14 Exhibit R-14, #15 Exhibit R-15, #16 Exhibit R-16, #17 Exhibit R-17, #18 Exhibit R-18, #19 Exhibit R-19, #20 Exhibit R-20, #21 Exhibit R-21, #22 Exhibit R-22, #23 Exhibit R-23, #24 Exhibit R-24, #25 Exhibit R-25, #26 Exhibit R-26, #27 Exhibit R-27, #28 Exhibit R-28, #29 Exhibit R-29, #30 Exhibit R-30, #31 Exhibit R-31, #32 Exhibit R-32, #33 Exhibit R-33, #34 Exhibit R-34, #35 Exhibit R-35, #36 Exhibit R-36, #37 Exhibit R-37, #38 Exhibit R-38)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 865
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #787 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 864
DECLARATION re #863 Answering Brief in Opposition, -- Declaration of Gregory H. Lantier -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-2)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 863
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #791 MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony contrary to the Court's Claim Construction Order filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 862
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #861 Answering Brief in Opposition, -- Declaration of Thomas F. Lampert -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-12)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 861
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #819 MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Intel Damages Experts Mr. Drew Pascarella, Dr. Robert Colwell, and Mr. Hance Huston filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 2/22/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 860
REDACTED VERSION of #809 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 859
REDACTED VERSION of #808 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-9)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 858
REDACTED VERSION of #806 Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 857
REDACTED VERSION of #805 Opening Brief in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 856
REDACTED VERSION of #826 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 855
REDACTED VERSION of #825 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 854
REDACTED VERSION of #823 Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 853
REDACTED VERSION of #822 Opening Brief in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 852
REDACTED VERSION of #818 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 851
REDACTED VERSION of #817 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-3)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 850
REDACTED VERSION of #815 Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 849
REDACTED VERSION of #814 Opening Brief in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 848
REDACTED VERSION of #802 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-22)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 847
REDACTED VERSION of #801 Statement by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 846
REDACTED VERSION of #800 Opening Brief in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 845
REDACTED VERSION of #798 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-3, #2 Exhibit 4-5)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 844
REDACTED VERSION of #797 Opening Brief in Support by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 843
REDACTED VERSION of #795 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-12)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 842
REDACTED VERSION of #793 Opening Brief in Support by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 841
REDACTED VERSION of #789 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-3)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 840
REDACTED VERSION of #788 Opening Brief in Support by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 839
REDACTED VERSION of #824 Declaration, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-I)(Farnan, Brian) (Main Document 839 replaced on 2/25/2022) (nmf, ). (Attachment 1 replaced on 2/25/2022) (nmf, ).
|
|
Filing 838
REDACTED VERSION of #821 Opening Brief in Support, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 837
REDACTED VERSION of #816 Statement, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibits 1-10)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 836
REDACTED VERSION of #813 Opening Brief in Support, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 835
REDACTED VERSION of #810 Statement,,, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Iian D. Jablon, #2 Exhibits 1-27)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 834
REDACTED VERSION of #807 Opening Brief in Support, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 833
REDACTED VERSION of #794 Declaration, of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-H)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 832
REDACTED VERSION of #792 Opening Brief in Support, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 831
SO ORDERED, re #830 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on January 18, 2022 to February 8, 2022, filed by Intel Corporation. Re-Setting Scheduling Order Deadlines: Dispositive Motions due by 2/8/2022. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/1/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 830
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on January 18, 2022 to February 8, 2022 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 829
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Daniel R. McCallum as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 828
SO ORDERED, re #827 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on January 18, 2022 to February 1, 2022, filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/27/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 827
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit redacted versions of their sealed summary judgment and Daubert papers originally filed on January 18, 2022 to February 1, 2022 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Motions No Longer Referred: #819 MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Intel Damages Experts Mr. Drew Pascarella, Dr. Robert Colwell, and Mr. Hance Huston, #796 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Mark Chandler , #787 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte , #791 MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony contrary to the Court's Claim Construction Order, #790 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. . The automatic referrals to the Magistrate Judge generated by the system, have been removed for these motions. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 826
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #823 Statement - Declaration of Gregory H. Lantier - by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-4)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 825
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #823 Statement - Declaration of Dr. Vivek Subramanian - by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 824
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #821 Opening Brief in Support, of S. Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 823
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #820 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 4 of No Direct Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 - Concise Statement of Facts - by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 822
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #820 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 4 of No Direct Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 821
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #819 MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Intel Damages Experts Mr. Drew Pascarella, Dr. Robert Colwell, and Mr. Hance Huston filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 820
MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 4 of No Direct Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 819
MOTION to Preclude Testimony of Intel Damages Experts Mr. Drew Pascarella, Dr. Robert Colwell, and Mr. Hance Huston - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian) Modified on 1/19/2022 (nmf).
|
|
Filing 818
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #815 Statement - Declaration of Dr. Vivek Subramanian - by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 817
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #815 Statement - Declaration of Gregory H. Lantier - by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 816
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #813 Opening Brief in Support, VLSI's Concise Statement of Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Unsupported Affirmative Defenses (No. 2) by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Adina Stohl, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 815
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #812 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 of No Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Allegations for U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 - Concise Statement of Facts - by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 814
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #812 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 of No Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Allegations for U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 813
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #811 MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Unsupported Affirmative Defenses (No. 2) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 812
MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 3 of No Infringement Under the Doctrine of Equivalents Allegations for U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 811
MOTION for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Unsupported Affirmative Defenses (No. 2) - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 810
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #807 Opening Brief in Support, VLSI's Concise Statement of Facts in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License (No. 1) by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Iian D. Jablon, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit 24, #26 Exhibit 25, #27 Exhibit 26, #28 Exhibit 27)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 809
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #806 Statement - Declaration of Dr. Vladimir Stojanovic - by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 808
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #806 Statement - Declaration of Joshua L. Stern - by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-9)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 807
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #804 MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License (No. 1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 806
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #803 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 of No Indirect or Willful Infringement, and No Enhanced Damages - Concise Statement of Facts - by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 805
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #803 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 of No Indirect or Willful Infringement, and No Enhanced Damages filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 804
MOTION for Summary Judgment regarding Intel's Affirmative Defense of License (No. 1) - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 803
MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 2 of No Indirect or Willful Infringement, and No Enhanced Damages - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 802
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #801 Statement - Declaration of Gregory Lantier - by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-22)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 801
[SEALED] STATEMENT re #799 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 that it is Licensed to the Asserted Patents - Concise Statement of Facts - by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 800
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #799 MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 that it is Licensed to the Asserted Patents filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 799
MOTION for Summary Judgment No. 1 that it is Licensed to the Asserted Patents - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 798
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #796 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Mark Chandler - Declaration of Thomas F. Lampert - by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3, #2 Exhibits 4-5)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 797
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #796 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Mark Chandler filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 796
MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Mark Chandler - filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 1/19/2022 (nmf).
|
|
Filing 795
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #790 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. - Declaration of Thomas F. Lampert - by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-12)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 794
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #792 Opening Brief in Support, of Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 793
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #790 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 792
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #791 MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony contrary to the Court's Claim Construction Order filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 791
MOTION to Preclude Expert Testimony contrary to the Court's Claim Construction Order - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian) Modified on 1/19/2022 (nmf).
|
|
Filing 790
MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. - filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 1/19/2022 (nmf).
|
|
Filing 789
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #787 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte -- Declaration of Joshua L. Stern -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 788
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #787 MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/1/2022. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 787
MOTION to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas M. Conte - filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 1/19/2022 (nmf).
|
|
Filing 786
SO ORDERED, re #785 Stipulation to Modify Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions, filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/14/2022. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 785
STIPULATION to Modify Briefing Schedule for Dispositive Motions and Daubert Motions by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorneys Daniel R. McCallum, Rachel Echols, and Steven Lieberman for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (srs)
|
|
Filing 784
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven Lieberman, Daniel R. McCallum, and Rachel M. Echols - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #784 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Steven Lieberman, Daniel R. McCallum, and Rachel M. Echols, filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/14/2021. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 783
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' December 1, 2021 status report, (D.I. 782), hereby ORDERS that by March 1, 2022, the parties will provide a joint status update to the Court regarding the '026 patent IPR appeals and any request to lift the stay. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/2/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 782
STATUS REPORT by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 781
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Notice of Deposition of Intel Corporation Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) and (2) Intel Corporation's Eleventh Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 780
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Seth Northrop and Dan Hulea by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 779
SUBPOENA Returned Executed as to GCA Law Partners LLP on October 25, 2021 (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 778
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Erez Levy, Jonathan M. James and Lin H. Chen by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 777
NOTICE of Amended Subpoenas to Jevan Anderson and Phil Hartstein by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 776
NOTICE of Subpoena Directed to GCA Law Partners LLP by Intel Corporation (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit)(Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 775
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Jevan Anderson and Phil Hartstein by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 774
SUBPOENA Returned Executed as to Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich & Belloli LLP on October 12, 2021 (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 773
SUBPOENA Returned Executed as to Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich & Belloli LLP on October 12, 2021 (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 772
NOTICE of Subpoenas Directed to Feinberg Day Kramer Alberti Lim Tonkovich & Belloli LLP by Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 771
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Intel Corporation on 11/16/2021 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 770
NOTICE to Take Deposition of VLSI Technology LLC on November 8, 2021 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 769
NOTICE of Subpoena to CFIP Goldfish Holdings LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 768
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Brian Weissenberg as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 767
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' September 8, 2021 status report, (D.I. 766), hereby ORDERS that by December 1, 2021, the parties will provide a joint status update to the Court regarding the '026 patent IPR appeals and any request to lift the stay. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/9/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 766
Joint STATUS REPORT by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 765
NOTICE of Corrected Subpoena to Atlas Technology Group, LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 764
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Seventh Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 303-309) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 763
SUBPOENA Returned Executed as to Perkins Coie LLP on August 26, 2021 (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 762
SUBPOENA Returned Executed as to GCA Law Partners LLP on August 25, 2021 (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: The docket texts of D.I. Nos. #758 through #761 have been corrected to reflect that they are subpoenas. (fms)
|
|
Filing 761
SUBPOENA Returned Executed on August 27, 2021 as to Potter Anderson Corroon LLP. (Uebler, Thomas) Modified on 8/30/2021 (fms).
|
|
Filing 760
SUBPOENA Returned Executed on August 25, 2021 as to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP. (Uebler, Thomas) Modified on 8/30/2021 (fms).
|
|
Filing 759
SUBPOENA Returned Executed on August 25, 2021 as to Sidley Austin LLP. (Uebler, Thomas) Modified on 8/30/2021 (fms).
|
|
Filing 758
SUBPOENA Returned Executed on August 25, 2021 as to Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP. (Uebler, Thomas) Modified on 8/30/2021 (fms).
|
|
Filing 757
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Responses to Intel Corporation's Fifth Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 46-47); (ii) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel's Seventh Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 44-48); and (iii) VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's Fifth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 148-155) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 756
NOTICE of Subpoena to Perkins Coie LLP by Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 755
NOTICE of Subpoena to Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP by Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 754
NOTICE of Subpoena to Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP by Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 753
NOTICE of Subpoena to Sidley Austin LLP by Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 752
NOTICE of Subpoena to Potter Anderson Corroon LLP by Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 751
NOTICE of Subpoena to GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP by Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 750
NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas A. Uebler on behalf of Intel Corporation (Uebler, Thomas)
|
|
Filing 749
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Finjan LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. #748 replaced with corrected version per filing party's request. (ceg)
|
|
SO ORDERED, #748 Proposed Order regarding Case Schedule. (See Order for details). ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 8/12/2021. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 748
PROPOSED ORDER Regarding Case Schedule re 747 Oral Order,, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy) (Main Document 748 replaced on 8/12/2021) (ceg).
|
|
Filing 747
ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' Joint Status Report (D.I. #738 ). It is HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' agreed-upon extensions to the discovery proceedings shall be adopted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Intel's proposal for extending the dispositive motion deadline will be adopted. Having considered the parties' competing positions, the Court concludes that a single dispositive motion deadline is appropriate under the circumstances. The parties shall agree upon and submit a proposed form of order that accords with the Court's rulings. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 8/11/2021. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 746
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Georgeson, LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 745
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Atlas Technology Group, LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 744
NOTICE of Subpoena to Fortress Investment Group LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 743
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Finjan Holdings, LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 742
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Seventh Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Intel Corporation (Nos. 303-309) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #741 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney R. Gregory Israelsen filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/29/2021. (fms)
|
|
Filing 741
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney R. Gregory Israelsen - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 740
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Sixth Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC (Nos. 44-48), (2) Intel Corporation's Fifth Set of Requests for Admissions (46-47), and (3) Intel Corporation's Fifth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 148-155) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 739
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Robert Colwell on 7/29/2021 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 738
Joint STATUS REPORT by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 737
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Lorin Hitt on 7/28/2021 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 736
ANSWER to #724 Amended Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 735
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Rachel S. Bier of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #735 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Rachel S. Bier of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/23/2021. (fms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, #734 Stipulation to Extend Time to File a Status Report pursuant to Judge Hall's July 6, 2021 Oral Order (D.I. 722) to July 27, 2021. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 7/22/2021. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 734
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file a status report pursuant to Judge Hall's July 6, 2021 Oral Order (D.I. 722) to July 27, 2021 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 733
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Mark Chandler on July 21, 2021 (Amended) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 732
REDACTED VERSION of #724 Amended Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 6)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #727 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file a redacted version of Defendant Intel Corporation's Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims to VLSI Technology LLC's Complaint for Patent Infringement (D.I. 724) to July 23, 2021 filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/20/2021. (fms)
|
|
Filing 731
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Vivek Subramanian on 7/20/2021 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 730
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Nicholas Godici on July 30, 2021 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 729
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Murali Annavaram on July 27, 2021 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 728
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Mark Chandler on July 21, 2021 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 727
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file a redacted version of Defendant Intel Corporation's Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims to VLSI Technology LLC's Complaint for Patent Infringement (D.I. 724) to July 23, 2021 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 726
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Ryan Sullivan on July 15, 2021 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 725
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Drew Pascarella on 7/16/2021 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 724
[SEALED] AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against VLSI Technology LLC by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 6)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 723
NOTICE to Take Deposition of John F. Rabena on 7/9/2021 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 722
ORAL ORDER: For the reasons stated in open court on July 6, 2021, Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims and to Sever and Stay Defense of License is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (D.I. #689 .) The transcript from the July 6, 2021, motion hearing shall serve as the Order of the Court. The parties are ordered to meet and confer and to provide a status report within 14 days addressing how they would like to proceed with any remaining discovery that may be needed as well as any further deadlines in the case. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 7/6/2021. (ceg)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jennifer L. Hall - Motion Hearing held by video conference on 7/6/2021 re #689 Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims and Motion to Sever and to Stay Defense of License filed by Intel Corporation. (*Court Reporter Susan Yoder.) (ceg)
|
|
Filing 721
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' June 7, 2021 status report, (D.I. 720), hereby ORDERS that by September 8, 2021, the parties will provide a joint status update to the Court regarding the '026 patent IPR appeals and any request to lift the stay.. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/8/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 720
STATUS REPORT by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 719
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Omar F. Amin as co-counsel.. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 718
ORAL ORDER Setting Hearing on Motions: A hearing on the pending Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims and Motion to Sever and to Stay Defense of License (D.I. #689 ) is scheduled for Tuesday, July 6, 2021 at 2:00 PM Eastern Time via video conference before Judge Jennifer L. Hall. The parties shall send a joint email to Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov containing the following information regarding oral argument on or before July 2, 2021: (1) a video conference link with instructions on how to join the conference; (2) a separate audio-only dial-in; and (3) a list of attendees for each party, specifying who will be presenting argument. Any video conference must be sufficient to accommodate Judge Hall, the courtroom deputy, a law clerk, and the court reporter. Any slide presentations or demonstratives that the parties wish to use during the hearing shall be emailed to Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov no later than 24 hours prior to the hearing. Slide presentations or demonstratives may be presented by the parties on the video conference screen or referred to by the parties at the hearing. Once the dial-in information is received by the Court, members of the public may obtain it by contacting Chambers at Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov. All participants (including any media and members of the public) are reminded that recording or broadcasting proceedings is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. All participants shall be present on the video conference no later than 10 minutes prior to the start of the hearing. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 4/26/2021. (ceg)
|
|
ORAL ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #689 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims MOTION to Sever and to Stay Defense of License filed by Intel Corporation. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/22/2021. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 717
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' April 6, 2021 status report, (D.I. 716), hereby ORDERS that by June 7, 2021, the parties will provide a joint status update to the Court regarding the '026 patent IPR appeals and any request to lift the stay. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/7/2021. (dlb)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #715 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for (i) Expert Discovery and (ii) Dispositive Motions to (i) July 29, 2021 and (ii) August 27, 2021 filed by VLSI Technology LLC, Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: ( Expert Discovery due by 7/29/2021., Dispositive Motions due by 8/27/2021.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/7/2021. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 716
Joint STATUS REPORT by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 715
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for (i) Expert Discovery and (ii) Dispositive Motions to (i) July 29, 2021 and (ii) August 27, 2021 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 714
REDACTED VERSION of #713 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 713
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #689 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims MOTION to Sever and to Stay Defense of License - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 712
REDACTED VERSION of #709 Declaration by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 711
REDACTED VERSION of #708 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 710
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Michael H. Strub, Jr. as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 709
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #708 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Jordan Nafekh by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 708
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #689 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims MOTION to Sever and to Stay Defense of License filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/16/2021. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 707
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Richard A. Crudo as co-counsel. Reason for request: no longer with firm. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 706
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' February 16, 2021 letter, (D.I. 705), hereby ORDERS that by April 6, 2021, they will provide a joint status update to the Court regarding the '026 patent IPR and any request to lift the stay.Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/16/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 705
STATEMENT re 702 Oral Order,,, Joint Response to The Court's February 10, 2021 Oral Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 704
REDACTED VERSION of #695 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: For administrative purposes, D.I. 683 has been re-coded and the docket text corrected to reflect the filing is a Report and Recommendation. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 703
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS denying #633 Motion to Dismiss and Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/10/2021. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 702
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 22, 2021 and February 9, 2021 letters regarding the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's Final Written Decisions ("FWDs") in the inter partes review proceedings regarding U.S. Patent Nos. 8,081,026 and 7,247,552, (D.I. 680; D.I. 697), hereby ORDERS that, in light of the FWDs and in light of the current stay in this case as to those two patents, (D.I. 615), the parties shall meet and confer about the status of this case. By no later than February 16, 2021, the parties shall jointly file a letter, of no more than two single-spaced pages, informing the Court as to whether either party wishes to move to lift the stay as to some or all of the asserted claims of the '026 patent. If any party does seek to so move and if that motion is contested, the Court will set a briefing schedule thereafter.. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/10/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 701
REDACTED VERSION of #690 Opening Brief in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 700
REDACTED VERSION of #688 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 699
ANSWER to #625 Amended Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 698
REDACTED VERSION of #687 Letter, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 697
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding update on PTAB decision - re 615 Oral Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 696
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Intel's February 8, 2021 letter, (D.I. 695), agrees that the information Intel highlighted in the attachments to that letter is the type of information Intel sought to disclose when it moved for relief from this court's Protective Order. As such, the Court agrees that this information may be disclosed in the antitrust case pursuant to the Court's February 3, 2021 order. (D.I. 693). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/9/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 695
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding response to Order - re 693 Oral Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 694
REDACTED VERSION of #685 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #692 Stipulation filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: ( Expert Discovery due by 5/13/2021., Dispositive Motions due by 6/10/2021.) See stipulation for further details. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/4/2021. (fms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #691 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadlines filed by VLSI Technology LLC, Set Briefing Schedule: re #689 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims MOTION to Sever and to Stay Defense of License. (Answering Brief due 3/9/2021., Reply Brief due 3/23/2021.). Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/4/2021. (fms)
|
|
Filing 693
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' motion regarding a protective order dispute, (D.I. 684), and the related briefing and supplemental submission, (D.I. 685; D.I. 687; D.I. 688), and having held a teleconference on the issue with the parties on February 1, 2021, hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) Paragraph 43 of the Protective Order provides, in part, that the "Designated Material and all information derived therefrom may be used... only for purposes of [this case and one other litigation matter not at issue here]... [u]nless otherwise ordered by the Court[.]" (D.I. 96 at para. 43); (2) Now Defendant Intel Corp. ("Intel") comes forward with a reason to modify the protective order: it wishes to disclose a very limited amount of information (relating to the cost or value of two of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's ("VLSI") patents-in-suit) that is purportedly subject to the protective order (the "information at issue") for the purposes of further amending Intel's complaint in a related antitrust case, Intel Corp. v. Fortress Inv. Grp. LLC, Case No. 3:19-cv-07651-EMC (N.D. Cal.), (the "antitrust case").; (3) Modification of the protective order requires the moving party to show good cause, using a balancing test and various factors set out in Pansy v. Borough of Stroudsburg, 23 F.3d 772, 786-87, 790 (3d Cir. 1994). See also PhishMe, Inc. v. Wombat Sec. Techs., Inc., Civil Action No. 16-403-LPS-CJB, 2017 WL 4138961, at *2 (D. Del. Sept. 8, 2017).; (4) Here, the relevant Pansy factors, see Arnold v. Pa., Dept. of Transp., 477 F.3d 105, 108 (3d Cir. 2007) (listing the factors), balance in Intel's favor: (i) As to the first Pansy factor (the interest in privacy of the party seeking protection), VLSI does not seem to raise this as a concern. (D.I. 687) As to at least some of the information at issue (i.e., a small portion of VLSI's damages contentions, including VLSI's view of the damages owed regarding infringement of one of the patents-in-suit here), the Court doubts that the material should be covered by the protective order in the first place. And to the extent the other information at issue is properly subject to that order, this first factor would be neutral, as it seems like there is every expectation that the information will also be kept under seal in the antitrust case, (D.I. 685 at 3), and Intel is not seeking to disclose it to the public.; (ii) As to the second Pansy factor (whether the information is being sought for a legitimate purpose or an improper purpose), this factor favors Intel, in that it seems like Intel's purpose for seeking relief from the protective order is legitimate. In the related antitrust case, the District Judge, in recently granting a motion to dismiss Intels complaint: (a) suggested that the information at issue here could be relevant to a further amended complaint; and (b) faulted Intel for not having sought leave of this Court to modify the protective order here, so that Intel could have included that information in its now-dismissed prior complaint. See Intel Corp. v. Fortress Inv. Grp., LLC, Case No. 3:19-cv-07651-EMC, D.I. 230 at 24-26 & n.9 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 6, 2021). The Court is mindful that there is good reason why parties would generally not want confidential information provided pursuant to a protective order in one litigation to be used to trigger additional lawsuits in other courts. And it would not expect to see such requests very often or to grant them very often. But here, the Court views Intel's request as both narrow and legitimate, in light of the fact that: (a) the information at issue is particularly cabined in nature; (b) the antitrust case implicates the very patents-in-suit that are at issue in this case; and (c) the District Judge in the antitrust case has noted the potential relevance of the information at issue to a forthcoming motion.; (iii) As to the third Pansy factor (the prevention of embarrassment, and whether that embarrassment would be particularly serious), VLSI does not argue that the information at issue is embarrassing. (D.I. 687) And, as noted above, much of the information will likely remain under seal in the antitrust case. So this factor favors Intel, or at least is neutral.; (iv) As to the fifth Pansy factor (whether sharing of the information among litigants would promote fairness and efficiency), this factor favors Intel, in light of the fact that the District Judge in the antitrust case has indicated that certain of the material could be relevant to core disputed issues regarding motion practice in that case, and the District Judge in the antitrust case has permitted Intel to file a further amended complaint by early March.; (v) Pansy factors four, six and seven do not seem to apply here.; and (vi) As to the additional factor noted in Pansy relating to "reliance by the original parties on the confidentiality order[,]" Pansy, 23 F.3d at 790, VLSI cites to paragraph 43 of the protective order and argues that it relied on the order's statement that confidential information in this case would never "be used in any other way whatsoever." (D.I. 687 at 1, 3 (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) (quoting D.I. 96 at para. 43)) But VLSI selectively omits reference to paragraph 43's statement that this restriction can be altered either by agreement of the parties (as has apparently already happened at times in this case) or by a Court order (which is what Intel is seeking to do here). (D.I. 96 at para. 43; see also id. at para. 65); and (5) The Court thus finds, after weighing the above factors, that Intel has done enough to show good cause to modify the protective order. That said, as discussed during the teleconference, the information Intel seeks to disclose, (D.I. 685 at 2), is much narrower than what is found in the entire text of the documents Intel attached as exhibits A-C of its letter brief. By no later than February 8, 2021, Intel shall provide the Court and VLSI with an indication of the narrow portions of those documents that it seeks to utilize in the antitrust case, so that the Court can confirm that those portions match the description of need provided in Intels letter brief.. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/3/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 692
STIPULATION Regarding Case Schedule and Discovery Disputes by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 691
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadlines for: (i) Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims and to Sever and Stay Defense of License and (ii) Defendant to file its Reply Brief to (i) 3/9/2021 and (ii) 3/23/2021 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 690
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #689 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims MOTION to Sever and to Stay Defense of License filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 2/16/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 689
MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims, MOTION to Sever and to Stay Defense of License - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 688
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding February 1, 2021 W.D. Tex. Transcript. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke Protective Order Dispute Teleconference held on February 1, 2021. After hearing the parties regarding the dispute, the Court took the matter under advisement. (Clerk, Sforza) APPEARANCES: B. Farnan, M. Harbour, C. Abernathy and I. Washburn for VLSI; J. Blumenfeld, A. Major, L. Herriot and M. Rassam for Intel. (Court Reporter, Jennifer Guy, Hawkins Reporting)(dlb)
|
|
Filing 687
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Protective Order Dispute - re 681 Order Setting Teleconference,,,,,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 686
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael D. Harbour and A. Matthew Ashley - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #686 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael D. Harbour and A. Matthew Ashley filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/29/2021. (fms)
|
|
Filing 685
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Protective Order Dispute - re 681 Order Setting Teleconference,,,,,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 684
Joint MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Protective Order Dispute - filed by Intel Corporation. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 683
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the transcript of the January 26, 2021 motion hearing on VLSI's Motion to Dismiss and Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims (D.I. 633) shall serve as the Report and Recommendation of the Court. Any objections shall be filed within 14 days from today's date. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 1/26/2021. (ceg) Modified on 2/11/2021 (ceg).
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jennifer L. Hall - Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 1/26/2021 re #633 Motion to Dismiss// Motion to Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (*Court Reporter Valerie Gunning.) (ceg)
|
|
Filing 682
Letter to The Honorable Jennifer L. Hall from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Case Cited in Intel's Answering Brief to VLSI's Motion to Dismiss and Strike Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hand Defenses and Counterclaims - re #639 Answering Brief in Opposition,. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 681
ORAL ORDER setting protective order dispute teleconference: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter regarding a protective order dispute, (D.I. 678), hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a protective order dispute set out in paragraph 8(g) of the Scheduling Order, will be modified as follows: (1) The parties shall file a "Joint Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Protective Order Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website; (2) A protective order dispute teleconference will be held on Monday, February 1, 2021 at 3:00 PM, with Defendants counsel to initiate the call; (3) By no later than January 27, 2021, the moving party shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three (3) single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues it is raising and its position on those issues; (3) By no later than January 29, 2021, the responding party may file an answering letter brief, not to exceed three (3) single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining its reasons for its opposition; (4) By no later than January 28, 2021, the parties shall jointly provide the Court's Courtroom Deputy, Ms. Benyo, with a dial-in number via email to use for the call.; and (5) It is possible that the Court may choose to resolve some or all of these disputes prior to the telephone conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/25/2021. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 680
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding PTAB Decision. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 679
Letter to The Honorable Jennifer L. Hall from Brian E. Farnan regarding Response to January 21, 2021 Oral Order - re 677 Order,,,,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 678
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Request for Scheduling of Protective Order Dispute Teleconference. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 677
ORAL ORDER: In preparation for the upcoming telephonic hearing on the pending Motion to Dismiss and Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims (D.I. #633 ), and in view of the fact that fact discovery with respect to the non-stayed patents has closed, expert discovery is nearing completion, and dispositive motions are due in March 2021, the parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a joint two-page letter no later than Friday, January 22, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. that explains whether any discovery relevant to the challenged defenses and counterclaims has been withheld on the basis that those defenses and counterclaims are subject to a pending motion to dismiss. The parties may also (but are not required to) set forth any reasons why, under the circumstances, the challenged defenses and counterclaims should not be assessed, in the first instance, on a full factual record in the context of the summary judgment process, which begins in a few weeks. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 1/21/2021. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 676
ORAL ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion: A telephonic hearing on the pending Motion to Dismiss and Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims (D.I. #633 ) is scheduled for January 26, 2021 at 3:00 PM before Judge Jennifer L. Hall. Each side will be allocated 15 minutes for argument. The parties shall send a joint email to Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov containing the following information regarding oral argument by 12:00 PM on January 25, 2021: (1) dial-in information; and (2) a list of attendees for each party, specifying who will be presenting argument. Any slide presentations or demonstratives that the parties wish to use during the hearing shall be emailed to Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov no later than 24 hours prior to the hearing. Once the dial-in information is received by the Court, members of the public may obtain it by contacting Chambers at Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov. All participants (including any media and members of the public) are reminded that recording or broadcasting proceedings is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. All participants shall be present on the teleconference no later than 10 minutes prior to the start of the hearing. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 1/15/2021. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 675
PUBLIC VERSION of #669 Memorandum Order re #643 Motion to Stay All Proceedings. (*See D.I. 674). (ceg)
|
|
Filing 674
ORAL ORDER: Having reviewed Defendant Intel Corporation's "Motion to Redact Portions of the November 24, 2020 Motion to Stay Hearing Transcript and November 25, 2020 Order" (D.I. #671 ), and the exhibits attached thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. To overcome the strong presumption of public access to judicial records, "[t]he movant must show that the material is the kind of information that courts will protect and that disclosure will work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking closure." In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Pracs. and Prods. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 672-73 (3d Cir. 2019). Intel's proposed redactions are, or relate directly to, the terms of an agreement between Intel and a third party, and I find that they contain the kind of commercial information that courts will protect. Moreover, the proposed redactions do not relate to "the core of the parties dispute," nor were they central to the Court's decision on the Motion to Stay. Mosaid Techs. Inc. v. LSI Corp., 878 F. Supp. 2d 503, 508 (D. Del. 2012). I also find that disclosure would work a clearly defined and serious injury to Intels position in future contract negotiations. Having conducted the requisite balancing process, I find that the harm of disclosing the information outweighs the importance of the disclosure to the public. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any publicly available copies of the transcript of the November 24, 2020 hearing, and the November 25, 2020 Memorandum Order, shall be the redacted versions attached as Exhibits C and D to Intel's motion. (D.I. 671, Exs. C, D.). SO ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 1/13/2021. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 673
REDACTED VERSION of #671 MOTION to Redact Portions of the November 24, 2020 Motion to Stay Hearing Transcript and November 25, 2020 Order by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibits A-E)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 672
ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall: #633 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/4/2020. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall.(nmf)
|
|
MOTION REFERRED: #671 MOTION to Redact Portions of the November 24, 2020 Motion to Stay Hearing Transcript and November 25, 2020 Order. Motion referred to Judge Jennifer L. Hall.(ceg)
|
|
Filing 671
[SEALED] MOTION to Redact Portions of the November 24, 2020 Motion to Stay Hearing Transcript and November 25, 2020 Order - filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit A-E)Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, #670 Unopposed Motion and Order to submit a proposed redacted version of the Court's November 25, 2020 Memorandum Order to December 3, 2020. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 12/3/2020. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 670
Unopposed MOTION and Order to submit a proposed redacted version of the Court's November 25, 2020 Memorandum Order to December 3, 2020 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy) Modified on 12/3/2020: re-coded and docket text corrected to reflect the filing is a motion (ceg).
|
|
Filing 669
[SEALED] MEMORANDUM ORDER re #643 Motion to Stay All Proceedings. (*See Order for details). Signed by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 11/25/2020.This order has been emailed to local counsel. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 668
ORAL ORDER: Defendant Intel's Motion to Stay All Proceedings (D.I. #643 ) is DENIED. The transcript of the November 24, 2020 telephonic motion hearing shall serve as the Order of the Court. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 11/24/2020. (ceg)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Jennifer L. Hall - Telephonic Motion Hearing held on 11/24/2020 re #643 Motion to Stay All Proceedings filed by Intel Corporation. (*Court Reporter Jennifer Guy.) (ceg)
|
|
Filing 667
[SEALED] EXHIBIT re #655 Reply Brief -- Corrected Exhibits to Reply Brief in Support of Motion to Stay Court Proceedings by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 666
SO ORDERED, re #665 Stipulation filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Setting Scheduling Order Deadlines: Expert Discovery Cutoff 2/19/2021; Dispositive Motions due by 3/12/2021. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/12/2020. (fms)
|
|
Filing 665
STIPULATION regarding Case Schedule by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 664
ORAL ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion: A telephonic hearing on the pending Motion to Stay Proceedings (D.I. #643 ) is scheduled for November 24, 2020 at 2:00 PM before Judge Jennifer L. Hall. The parties shall send a joint email to Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov containing the following information regarding oral argument on or before November 20, 2020: (1) dial-in information; and (2) a list of attendees for each party, specifying who will be presenting argument. Any slide presentations or demonstratives that the parties wish to use during the hearing shall be emailed to Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov no later than 24 hours prior to the hearing. Once the dial-in information is received by the Court, members of the public may obtain it by contacting Chambers at Cailah_Garfinkel@ded.uscourts.gov. All participants (including any media and members of the public) are reminded that recording or broadcasting proceedings is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. All participants shall be present on the teleconference no later than 10 minutes prior to the start of the hearing. ORDERED by Judge Jennifer L. Hall on 11/9/2020. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 663
ORDER REFERRING MOTION: #643 MOTION to Stay All Proceedings filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/30/2020. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Hall.(nmf)
|
|
Filing 662
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Reply Expert Report of Robert Colwell, Ph.D., (2) Reply Expert Report of John F. Rabena, (3) Reply Expert Report of Vladimir Stojanovic, Ph.D., Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,246,027, and (4) Reply Expert Report of Vivek Subaramanian, Ph.D. Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 661
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Reply Expert Report of Dr. Murali Annavaram Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331; (ii) Reply Expert Report of Dr. Thomas M. Conte Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,246,027; (iii) Reply Expert Report on Licensing of Mark J. Chandler; and (iv) Reply Report of Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ian R. Washburn for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (kmd)
|
|
Filing 660
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ian Washburn - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #660 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ian Washburn filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/22/2020. (fms)
|
|
Remark: Per Letter at D.I. 659, the Teleconference set for 10/26/2020 at 11 with Judge Burke has been cancelled. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 659
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding discovery dispute hearing - re #648 Letter, 649 Order Setting Teleconference,,,,,,. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 658
REDACTED VERSION of #652 Declaration of Michael Stolarski by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 657
REDACTED VERSION of #651 Declaration, of Iian Jablon by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-G)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 656
REDACTED VERSION of #650 Answering Brief in Opposition by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 655
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #643 MOTION to Stay All Proceedings filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-D)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 654
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Rebuttal Expert Report of Robert Colwell Ph.D., (2) Rebuttal Expert Report and Disclosure of Julie L. Davis, (3) Rebuttal Expert Report of Lorin Hitt, Ph.D., (4) Rebuttal Expert Report and Disclosure of Hance Huston, (5) Rebuttal Expert Report and Disclosure of Drew Pascarella, (6) Rebuttal Expert Report of Vladimir Stojanovic, Ph.D. Regarding U.S. Patent No. 7,246,027, and (7) Rebuttal Expert Report of Vivek Subaramanian, Ph.D. Regarding Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 653
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Murali Annavaram Regarding Validity of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331; (ii) Rebuttal Expert Report of Dr. Thomas M. Conte Regarding Validity of U.S. Patent No. 7,246,027; and (iii) Rebuttal Expert Report of Nicholas P. Godici filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 652
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #650 Answering Brief in Opposition of Michael Stolarski by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 651
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #650 Answering Brief in Opposition of Iian Jablon by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 650
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #643 MOTION to Stay All Proceedings filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 10/2/2020. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 649
ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the parties' September 22, 2020 letter requesting a discovery teleconference. (D.I. 648) It hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a discovery dispute set out in the Scheduling Order, (D.I. 40), will be modified as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website.; (2) A discovery dispute teleconference is set for October 26, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (3) By no later than October 5, 2020, any party seeking relief shall file a letter, not to exceed three (3) single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues.; (4) By no later than October 15, 2020, any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) single-spaced pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that party(s) reasons for its opposition.; (5) By no later than October 22, 2020, the parties shall jointly provide the Court's Courtroom Deputy, Ms. Benyo, with a dial-in number via e-mail to use for the call.; and (6) It is possible that the Court may choose to resolve some or all of these disputes prior to the telephone conference and may, in that event, cancel the conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/23/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 648
[SEALED] Letter to Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding discovery disputes. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 647
ORDER approving #646 Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Brian E. Farnan and Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Intel Corp.'s Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims (D.I. #625 ) and VLSI's Related Motion to Dismiss and Strike (D.I. #633 ).. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/17/2020. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 646
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Brian E. Farnan and Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Intel Corp.'s Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims (D.I. 625) and VLSI's Related Motion to Dismiss and Strike (D.I. 633). (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 645
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #643 MOTION to Stay All Proceedings -- Declaration of Greg Lantier -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-C)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 644
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #643 MOTION to Stay All Proceedings filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/25/2020. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 643
MOTION to Stay All Proceedings - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #642 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Serve Responsive and Reply Expert Reports to September 30, 2020 and October 28, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/11/2020. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 642
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Serve Responsive and Reply Expert Reports to September 30, 2020 and October 28, 2020 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 641
REDACTED VERSION of #639 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 640
REPLY BRIEF re #633 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 639
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #633 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 8/24/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 638
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Expert Report of Robert Colwell Ph.D. Regarding Analysis of Intel-Patented Inventions Practiced in Intel Products at Issue, (2) Expert Report of Sylvia D. Hall-Ellis, Ph.D., (3) Expert Report of John Kubiatowicz, Ph.D. regarding U.S. Patent No. 6,212,633, (4) Expert Report of John F. Rabena, (5) Expert Report of Vladimir Stojanovic, Ph.D. regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,246,027, and (6) Expert Report of Vivek Subaramanian, Ph.D. Regarding Invalidity of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 637
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Opening Expert Report of Dr. Murali Annavara Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331; (ii) Expert Report on Licensing of Mark J. Chandler; (iii) Opening Expert Report of Dr. Thomas M. Conte Regarding Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,246,027; and (iv) Report of Ryan Sullivan, Ph.D. filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 636
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying #276 MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by VLSI Technology LLC, #580 Second MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/3/2020. (fms)
|
|
Filing 635
DECLARATION re #634 Opening Brief in Support, of Christopher Abernethy by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 634
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #633 MOTION to Dismiss MOTION to Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/3/2020. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 633
MOTION to Dismiss, MOTION to Strike Intel Corporation's Inequitable Conduct and Unclean Hands Defenses and Counterclaims - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 632
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael H. Strub Jr. - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #632 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Michael H. Strub Jr. filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/20/2020. (nmf)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Michael H. Strub for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
|
|
Filing 631
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Fourth Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 27-40), (2) Intel Corporation's Fourth Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 17-26), and (3) Intel Corporation's Seventh Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 14) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 630
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Third Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 17-26), (2) Intel Corporation's Third Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 27-40), and (3) Intel Corporation's Sixth Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 14) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 629
REDACTED VERSION of #625 Amended Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 628
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (i) for Plaintiff to answer, move or otherwise respond to Intel Corporation's Counterclaims; (ii) for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's motion if filed; and (iii) for Plaintiff to file a reply in support of motion if filed to (i) 7/20/2020; (ii) 8/17/2020; and (iii) 8/31/2020 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #628 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (i) for Plaintiff to answer, move or otherwise respond to Intel Corporation's Counterclaims; (ii) for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's motion if filed; and (iii) for Plaintiff to file a reply in support of motion filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/30/2020. (fms)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf of the Memorandum Opinion of 6/26/2020 has been replaced to list the correct counsel for Defendant. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 627
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #257 Motion to Amend/Correct. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/26/2020. (fms) (Main Document 627 replaced on 6/26/2020) (fms).
|
|
Filing 626
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/26/2020. (fms) (Main Document 626 replaced on 6/26/2020) (fms). (Main Document 626 replaced on 6/29/2020) (nmf, ).
|
|
The Memorandum Opinion and Order at D.I. Nos. #626 and #627 have been replaced with text searchable versions. (fms)
|
|
Filing 625
[SEALED] AMENDED ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, COUNTERCLAIM against VLSI Technology LLC by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 624
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Eighth Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos 1-13), (2) Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Sixth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 41-45), (3) Intel Corporation's Fifth Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 14), (4) Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 27-40), and (5) Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 17-26) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 623
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Defendant's motion for leave to amend its answer, defenses and counterclaims ("Motion"), (D.I. 255), by which it seeks to add counterclaims and corresponding defenses for unenforceability of three of the five asserted patents (the '633 patent, the '027 patent and the '331 patent) due to inequitable conduct ("the inequitable conduct claims") and the affirmative defense of unclean hands (the "unclean hands defense"), as well as the briefing related thereto, (D.I. 256; D.I. 273; D.I. 287), hereby ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff challenged the Motion on two grounds: (1) that Defendant unduly delayed in bringing it (and relatedly, that this delay demonstrated that the Motion was brought in bad faith); and (2) that grant of the Motion would cause undue prejudice to Plaintiff. (D.I. 273 at 5-14) (Plaintiff did not challenge the Motion on futility grounds, noting that it would instead reserve such arguments for a forthcoming motion to dismiss/strike the claims/defenses, were the Motion granted.) (Id. at 5, 15) With regard to undue delay, Plaintiff is probably correct that most or all of the documents and facts underlying the inequitable conduct claims were publicly available to Defendant prior to the date when Defendant filed its initial Answer on April 9, 2019, (D.I. 128), the date by which Plaintiff argues Defendant should have timely brought these allegations. And it is also probably true that a good bit (though certainly not all) of the material related to Defendants' unclean hands defense was available to Defendant by then. But it is also true that (especially in this large, complex case) it could have reasonably taken Defendant some time thereafter to process the information related to the instant claims/defenses, figure out whether they amounted to viable claims/defenses and then bring those claims/defenses forward. (D.I. 287 at 5) More importantly, Defendant's motion was filed on the date set out as the deadline for amendment of pleadings in the Scheduling Order (a date, so far as the Court can tell, that both Plaintiff and Defendant proposed to the District Court). (D.I. 36; D.I. 40 at para. 2; D.I. 253) It would be the unusual case where a Court had previously determined (at the parties' request) that amendment could be allowed by a certain date without causing harm to the case schedule, and yet thereafter the Court would nevertheless find a claim filed by that deadline to be untimely. See Invensas Corp. v. Renesas Elecs. Corp., Civil Action No. 11-448-GMS-CJB, 2013 WL 1776112, at *3 (D. Del. Apr. 24, 2013); Butamax Advanced Biofuels LLC v. Gevo, Inc., Civ. No. 11-54-SLR, 2012 WL 2365905, at *2 (D. Del. June 21, 2012). With regard to the undue prejudice issue, because the Motion was filed prior to the deadline for amending pleadings, it is hard for Plaintiff to convincingly argue that it would be unduly prejudiced by the addition of the claims/defenses. The Medicines Co. v. Teva Parenteral Meds., Inc., C.A. No. 09-750-ER (Consolidated), 2011 WL 13135647, at *25 & n.18 (D. Del. Aug. 26, 2011); Butamax, 2012 WL 2365905, at *2. Additionally, undue prejudice is not likely to occur via grant of the Motion because: (1) Plaintiff is familiar with many of the underlying facts relating to the claims/defenses at issue and its counsel represents many of the third parties who are relevant to the inequitable conduct claims, (D.I. 287 at 8-9), so since the filing of the Motion, it has likely developed a good sense of its response to the claims/defenses; and (2) since the filing of the Motion, the case schedule has changed, and no trial date is now set, meaning there could be time to address these issues prior to any trial. Lastly, the Court agrees with Defendant that although the case is currently stayed as to the '026 and '552 patents, since the arguments as to this Motion were not patent-specific, the Motion should be and is GRANTED as to the unclean hands defense in its entirety. (D.I. 617 at 1) However, because it is clear that Plaintiff now intends to challenge that defense on a patent-by-patent basis, (id. at 2), the Court ORDERS that Plaintiff's deadline to file a motion to dismiss or strike that defense based on any argument uniquely related to the '026 or '552 patents is STAYED until 21 days after the stay regarding those two patents is lifted by the Court, (id. at 1). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/19/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 622
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Second Amended Privilege Log filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 621
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Cindy Simpson on June 11, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 620
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Tenth Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 619
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Eric Scheuerlein and Daylight Law, P.C. on June 2, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 618
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Fourth Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 14) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 617
Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Impact of Order Partially Staying Case on Pending Motions - re 615 Oral Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 616
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Amended Identification of No More Than Eighteen Asserted Patent Claims Pursuant to the Court's April 22, 2019 Memorandum Order (D.I. 136) and May 8, 2020 Oral Order (D.I. 615) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 615
ORAL ORDER The Court, having considered Defendant Intel Corporation's ("Defendant") motion to stay pending inter partes review ("IPR") proceedings ("Motion"), (D.I. 585), and the briefing related thereto, (D.I. 586; D.I. 592; D.I. 596), and having considered the three stay-related factors, hereby ORDERS that the Motion be GRANTED-IN-PART. The decision here would have been more difficult, but for a very sensible alternate proposal made by Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC ("Plaintiff") which, in granting this motion in part, the Court is adopting. In its answering brief, Plaintiff agreed: (1) to stay the case as to two of the four patents-in-suit where there are currently asserted claims under review in IPR proceedings (i.e., the '026 patent and the '552 patents), and (2) to drop one currently asserted claim of the '331 patent. (D.I. 592 at 2) This proposal brings with it the chance to maximize efficiency for all parties and the Court. It allows the case (a case pending for nearly two years, in which the Court and the parties have already invested a tremendous amount of time and energy) to move forward regarding the asserted claims of two patents (the '027 patent and the '331 patent) that will be unaffected by the IPR proceedings, and to be ready for trial on the asserted claims of those patents (if necessary) once the District Court resolves summary judgment motions that are set to be filed later this year. And if Defendant is correct that the asserted claims of the '026 and '552 patents will be found to be invalid by the United States Patent and Trademark Office, (D.I. 586 at 9), then such a stay will ensure that no wasted work is done by the parties or by the Court as to those two patents between now and when the IPRs conclude by February 2021. And alternately, if any of the asserted claims of the '026 and '552 patents are not found invalid in the IPRs by early 2021, the District Court will retain flexibility as to how to handle that situation (in that it could then decide to hold one later-scheduled trial on all remaining patents/asserted claims, after any remaining pre-trial work concludes as to the '026 and '552 patents, or it could then decide to move forward with trial as to the '027 and '331 patents and put any surviving asserted claims of the '026 and '552 patents on a separate trial track with a separate trial date). Therefore, the case is STAYED with regard to the '026 and '552 patents until further order of the Court. The Court also ORDERS that by no later than May 15, 2020, the parties shall submit a joint letter, of no more than three single-spaced pages, advising the Court and the District Court as to which portions of the other currently pending motions (D.I. 255; D.I. 257; D.I. 276; D.I. 580) need not be decided at this time (unless the Court or the District Court determines otherwise) because those portions deal with the '026 and '552 patents. The Court further ORDERS the parties to jointly notify the Court by letter within 10 days of the issuance of a Final Written Decision in the IPR proceedings (so that the Court can determine whether to lift the stay at that point).Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 5/8/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 614
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Supplemental Privilege Log Supplemental Identification of Attorneys filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Ben Yorks for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mal)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #613 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ben J. Yorks filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/29/2020. (fms)
|
|
Filing 613
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Ben J. Yorks - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #610 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (i) Certain Fact Discovery; (ii) Opening Expert Reports; (iii) Rebuttal Expert Reports; (iv) Reply Experts Reports; (v) Expert Discovery; and (vi) Dispositive Motions to (i) June 22, 2020; (ii) July 31, 2020; (iii) September filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 4/27/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 612
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Ninth Supplemental Initial Disclosures, (2) Intel Corporation's Eighth Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13), and (3) Intel Corporation's Fourth Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 15-16) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 611
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's Fourth Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 18-45) and Authentication Requests (Nos. 1-13) and (ii) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 22-42) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 610
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (i) Certain Fact Discovery; (ii) Opening Expert Reports; (iii) Rebuttal Expert Reports; (iv) Reply Experts Reports; (v) Expert Discovery; and (vi) Dispositive Motions to (i) June 22, 2020; (ii) July 31, 2020; (iii) September 28, 2020; (iv) October 26, 2020; (v) December 4, 2020; and (vi) January 11, 2021 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 609
ORDER REFERRING MOTIONS: #255 MOTION to Amend/Correct #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims -- filed by Intel Corporation and #585 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review Proceedings Related to the Asserted Patents filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/13/2020. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke.(nmf)
|
|
Filing 608
NOTICE of Subpoena to Cindy Simpson by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 607
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel's Corporation's Third Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 14) and (2) Intel Corporation's Seventh Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 606
NOTICE to Take Deposition of GKC Partners II, LP on April 1, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 605
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Gerchen Keller Capital, LLC on April 1, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 604
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Adam Gill on April 1, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 603
REDACTED VERSION of #596 Reply Brief by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 602
REDACTED VERSION of #594 Reply Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 601
REDACTED VERSION of #582 Declaration, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-17)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 600
REDACTED VERSION of #581 Opening Brief in Support, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 599
REDACTED VERSION of #593 Declaration, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-16)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 598
REDACTED VERSION of #592 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 597
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Amended Tentative List of Fact Witnesses for Trial and (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Amended and Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 596
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #585 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review Proceedings Related to the Asserted Patents filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 595
REDACTED VERSION of #591 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-5)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 594
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #580 Second MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 593
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #592 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 592
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #585 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review Proceedings Related to the Asserted Patents filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/23/2020. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 591
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #580 Second MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 3/20/2020. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-5)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #590 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for (1) Defendant Intel Corporation to File Its Opposition to VLSI's Second Motion to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims and (2) for Plaintiff VLSI to File Its Brief in Opposition to Intel's Motion to Stay filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/13/2020. (fms)
|
|
Filing 590
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for (1) Defendant Intel Corporation to File Its Opposition to VLSI's Second Motion to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims and (2) for Plaintiff VLSI to File Its Brief in Opposition to Intel's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review to March 13, 2020 and March 16, 2020 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #589 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas F. Lampert filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/11/2020. (fms)
|
|
Filing 589
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Thomas F. Lampert - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 588
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Eighth Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 587
DECLARATION re #585 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review Proceedings Related to the Asserted Patents -- Declaration of Joshua L. Stern -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-Q)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 586
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #585 MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review Proceedings Related to the Asserted Patents filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/13/2020. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 585
MOTION to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review Proceedings Related to the Asserted Patents - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 584
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel Corporation's Amended Identification of Thirty Prior Art Combinations filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 583
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel Corporation's Third Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Paragraph 4(d) of the District of Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Motions No Longer Referred: #580 Second MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed. The automatic referral to the magistrate judge generated by the system has been removed for this motion. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 582
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #581 Opening Brief in Support, of Christopher Abernethy by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 581
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #580 Second MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 3/12/2020. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 580
Second MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Rule 7.1.1 Certification)(Farnan, Brian) Modified on 2/28/2020 (nmf).
|
|
Filing 579
REDACTED VERSION of #574 Status Report by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 578
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Kevin A. Goldman as co-counsel. Reason for request: no longer with firm. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 577
ORAL ORDER: The Court has considered the parties' most recent letter regarding the status of production of source code, (D.I. 574), relating to the pending Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes, ("Motion") (D.I. 410; see also D.I. 499, 502). In light of the fact that it appears that the parties are progressing toward resolution of the remaining outstanding issues relating to that Motion, the Court HEREBY DENIES the currently-outstanding portion of the Motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEW. Any further status letters concerning these topics need not be filed. In the future, should an unresolvable dispute arise concerning any such issues, the parties should (after having met and conferred regarding the dispute) promptly alert the Court of the dispute by letter. The Court will then set out a process for resolving the dispute.Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/20/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 576
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding IPR Institution. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 575
REDACTED VERSION of #568 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 574
[SEALED] Joint STATUS REPORT Concerning Source Code by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 573
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Sixth Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 286-302), (2) Intel Corporation's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Sixth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 41-45), (3) Intel Corporation's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 27-40), (4) Intel Corporation's Third Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 15-16), (5) Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 14), (6) Intel Corporation's First Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 17-26), (7) Intel Corporation's Sixth Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13), and (8) Defendant Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Paragraph 4(d) of the District of Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 572
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Amended and Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 571
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Third Amended Exhibit 2 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures and (ii) Fourth Amended Exhibit 5 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 570
ORAL ORDER: The Court has considered the parties' most recent letters regarding the status of production of documents, (D.I. 568, 569), relating to the pending Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes, ("Motion") (D.I. 345; see also D.I. 351). In light of the fact that it appears that the parties are progressing toward resolution of the remaining outstanding issues relating to that Motion, the Court HEREBY DENIES the currently-outstanding portion of the Motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO RENEW. Any further status letters concerning these topics need not be filed. In the future, should an unresolvable dispute arise concerning any such issues, the parties should (after having met and conferred regarding the dispute) promptly alert the Court of the dispute by letter. The Court will then set out a process for resolving the dispute. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/14/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 569
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Category B Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 568
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Requests for Production regarding Tools. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 567
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Seventh Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 566
REDACTED VERSION of #560 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 565
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' February 7, 2020 letter, (D.I. #564 ), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by February 17, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/10/2020. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 564
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Michael J. Farnan regarding Status Report on Source Code Production. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 563
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' February 3, 2020 letter, (D.I. 561), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by February 12, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/4/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 562
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' February 3, 2020 letter, (D.I. 560), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by February 12, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/4/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 561
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Category B documents. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 560
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Tools. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 559
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Third Amended and Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 558
NOTICE to Take Deposition of GKC Partners II, LP on February 14, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 557
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Gerchen Keller Capital, LLC on February 14, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 556
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Adam Gill on February 14, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 555
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoenas to Adam Gill by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 554
REDACTED VERSION of #548 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 553
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 27, 2020 letter, (D.I. 552), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by February 7, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/28/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 552
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Source Code Productions. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 551
REDACTED VERSION of #543 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 550
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 21, 2020 letter, (D.I. 547), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by February 3, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/22/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 549
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 21, 2020 letter, (D.I. 548), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by February 3, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/22/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 548
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian Farnan regarding Tools and Simulators - re 532 Oral Order,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 547
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Category B Requests - re 533 Oral Order,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 546
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Efraim Rotem on January 31, 2020 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 545
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 17, 2020 letter, (D.I. 543), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by January 27, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/21/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 544
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel Corporation's Identification of Thirty Prior Art Combinations filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 543
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Source Code Productions. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 542
REDACTED VERSION of #527 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 541
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Brian Driscoll as co-counsel. Reason for request: No longer with Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 540
REDACTED VERSION of #521 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 539
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Adam Gill on January 29, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 538
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoenas to Adam Gill by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 537
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Requests for Admissions (Nos. 1-2) and (ii) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Sixth Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Intel Corporation (Nos. 286-302) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 536
REDACTED VERSION of #504 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-K)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 535
REDACTED VERSION of #509 Letter, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-19)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 534
REDACTED VERSION of #507 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 533
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 13, 2020 letter, (D.I. 529), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by January 21, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/14/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 532
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 10, 2020 letter, (D.I. 527), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by January 21, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/14/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 531
REDACTED VERSION of #487 Notice (Other) by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 530
REDACTED VERSION of #486 Notice (Other) by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 529
Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Category B Requests - re 512 Oral Order,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 528
ORAL ORDER: Pursuant to the parties Stipulation filed today, (D.I. 525), the discovery dispute teleconference scheduled for January 17, 2020 is CANCELLED as the parties have resolved the disputes; any yet-to-be filed briefing now need not be filed. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/13/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Per the "So Ordered" of the parties' stipulation at D.I. #525 , the 10/15/2020 Pretrial Conference and the 11/2/2020 Jury Trial are cancelled and will be rescheduled after the dispositive motions have been decided. (nmf)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #525 Stipulation Regarding Case Schedule and Discovery Disputes filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/13/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 527
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Responses to Certain Requests for Production. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 526
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Seventh Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14); and (ii) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Second Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 15) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 525
STIPULATION Regarding Case Schedule and Discovery Disputes re #363 Memorandum and Order, #495 Letter, #467 Memorandum and Order, #509 Letter, #298 Letter, #504 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 524
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 9, 2020 letter, (D.I. 521), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by January 17, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/10/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 523
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Leah Johannesson as co-counsel.. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 522
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental and Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 15-16) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 521
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Source Code Productions. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 520
NOTICE to Take Deposition of James Kovacs on 1/15/2020 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 519
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Third Amended Exhibit 4 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures and (ii) Third Amended Exhibit 5 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 518
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewing Plaintiff's letter, (D.I. #517 ), notes that the Court's January 7, 2020 Oral Order (D.I. 515) was issued in error. That ORDER is HEREBY WITHDRAWN. Instead, the Court's other January 7, 2020 Oral Order, which had set Plaintiff's answering brief for this dispute to be due on January 13, 2020, and which had moved the teleconference regarding this dispute to January 17, 2020 at 3:00 p.m., (D.I. 513), remains in effect. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/8/2020. (mlc)
|
|
MOTION REFERRED: #516 MOTION to Strike VLSI's '026 Patent Infringement Contentions Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke per the referral order.(nmf)
|
|
Document Unsealed. D.I. #467 Memorandum Order unsealed - no redactions requested. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 517
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding January 7, 2020 Oral Order (D.I. 515) - re 515 Oral Order,,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 516
MOTION to Strike VLSI's '026 Patent Infringement Contentions - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 515
ORAL ORDER: The Court has reviewed Defendant's January 3, 2020 letter regarding a motion to strike (the "Motion"), (D.I. 504). It hereby ORDERS that with regard to this dispute: (1) By no later than January 10, 2020, any party opposing the Motion shall file a responsive letter, not to exceed five (5) single-spaced pages.; (2) By no later than January 14, 2020: (a) the moving party may file a reply letter, not to exceed two (2) single-spaced pages; (b) the moving party shall also file a one-page "Motion to Strike" on the docket; and (c) both parties shall jointly file a letter requesting a teleconference to address the Motion. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/7/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 514
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' letters with regard to Plaintiff's fourth discovery dispute regarding materials that Defendant provides to OEMs, such as ME/CSME BIOS Extensions ("MEBX"), Flash Image Customization Tool ("FITC"), and ME/CSME firmware kits ("Motion") (D.I. 426 at 4; D.I. 446 at 4), and having heard oral argument, (D.I. 459 (hereinafter "Tr.")), HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED for the following reasons: (1) As to the FITC executable code, Defendant has represented that it has produced the FITC source code in executable form. (Tr. at 58, 60) In light of Defendant's representation, the Court is not aware that there is anything more that it can compel Defendant to produce. (2) As to MEBXs and ME/CSME firmware kits, the Court understands that Plaintiff initially requested an overly broad group of "[a]ll" documents relating to these topics. (Tr. at 59; D.I. 455 at 66 (referring to D.I. 173, ex. 18 at 8 and RFPs 135-36); D.I. 446 at 4 n.10) The Court further understands that Defendant subsequently identified a narrower set of relevant, responsive documents relating to these topics and that it was in the process of collecting and producing them. (Tr. at 59, 62) Beyond that, Plaintiff has not provided the Court with a basis to believe that there are relevant MEBX or ME/CSME firmware kit materials that are in Defendants possession and that have not been produced. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/7/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 513
ORAL ORDER: Due to a scheduling conflict, the discovery dispute teleconference set for January 13, 2020 has been rescheduled and set for January 17, 2020 at 3:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke. The date by which the party opposing the application for relief shall file its letter has been extended until January 13, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/7/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 512
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 3, 2020 letter, (D.I. 508), hereby ORDERS that, the parties shall file a joint letter by no later than January 13, 2020, indicating: (a) whether any disputes concerning these RFPs remain, and, if so, (b) whether any further Court intervention is required. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/6/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 511
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 3, 2020 letter, (D.I. 507), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by January 10, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/6/2020. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 510
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Sixth Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 509
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Discovery Dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 508
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Category B Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 507
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Requests for Production regarding Tools. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 506
NOTICE of Subpoenas of The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) by Intel Corporation (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 505
NOTICE to Take Deposition of The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers on January 15, 2020 filed by Intel Corporation.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 504
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding motion to strike. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-K)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 503
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Identification of Eighteen Asserted Patent Claims Pursuant to the Court's April 22, 2019 Memorandum Order (D.I. 136) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 502
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' letters with regard to Plaintiff's third discovery dispute, (i.e., the dispute as to Defendant's ME/CSME manifest files, related source code, and specifications) ("Motion") (D.I. 426 at 3-4; D.I. 446 at 4), and having heard oral argument, (D.I. 459 (hereinafter "Tr.")), HEREBY ORDERS as follows: (1) With regard to the manifest files, the Court can understand why such files (at least those that describe how instructions relating to the accused functionality are loaded) are relevant to Plaintiff's claims of infringement relating to the '331 patent. (D.I. 426 at 3 (citing exhibits)) Indeed, in its arguments opposing the Motion, Defendant does not primarily focus on relevance as a defense to non-production of those types of manifest files. (Tr. at 42, 46-49, 53, 60-61) As to responsiveness, Defendant has determined not to challenge the request for such manifest files on this ground, conceding for our purposes that such files could be responsive at least to Plaintiff's requests seeking "Specifications." (Tr. at 48-49, 53; see also D.I. 426 at 4) With regard to the parties' dispute as to whether such files would be human-readable (and thus even usable), (e.g., D.I. 448 at para. 9; Tr. at 45, 50), the Court is not certain that the content at issue would be unreadable, and if the material is otherwise relevant, the Court cannot conclude that this defense to non-production is a good one. This leaves Defendant's assertions about undue burden, wherein it represented that: (a) manifest files do not actually exist as standalone files; (b) to produce the relevant content via production of large portions of executable code would create significant "security concerns[;]" and (c) thus, it has proposed providing Plaintiff with what it asserts is the "same information" by presenting certain XML files. (Tr. at 49-51, 61; D.I. 446 at 4; D.I. 448 at para. 7) As a practical matter, before ordering Defendant to produce the executable code referenced above (and before further investigating the "security concerns" referenced by Defendant), it makes sense for the Court to know whether Plaintiff agrees that the XML files referenced by Defendant do indeed provide it with sufficient information. To that end, this part of the Motion is GRANTED in that in the parties' January 9 letter, (see D.I. 499), they should update the Court on the status of the production of a representative set of such XML files. (2) With regard to the dispute over the "build tool" that creates the manifest file from the XML files, (Tr. at 44, 53; D.I. 426 at 4), Plaintiff has argued that without access to it, the XML files would "do us little good[,]" (Tr. at 54). The Court just does not have enough information, one way or the other, to understand if that is correct or not. So for now, this portion of its Motion is DENIED, but subject to Plaintiff's ability to re-raise the issue in the future.; (3) As to the Plaintiff's request for all "Specifications relating to ME/CSME manifests[,]" (D.I. 426 at 4), the Court understands that Defendant was in the process of producing some additional materials, (D.I. 446 at 4). Beyond that, however, Plaintiff did not provide the Court with sufficient information to determine that there likely exists additional, relevant un-produced such specifications, and it did not further press its case for these documents during oral argument. (Tr. at 41-46, 51-54) For these reasons, this portion of its Motion is also DENIED. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/3/2020. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 501
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Second Amended Exhibit 2 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 500
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Jason Kennedy on 1/10/2020 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 499
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' letters with regard to Plaintiff's second discovery dispute, (i.e., the dispute regarding Power Management Controller ("PMC") firmware source code and specifications) ("Motion") (D.I. 426 at 2-3; D.I. 446 at 3), and having heard oral argument, (D.I. 459 (hereinafter "Tr.")), HEREBY ORDERS as follows: (1) As to the firmware source code, the Court understands that Defendant has agreed to produce it and, as of the date of oral argument, was in the process of obtaining it so that it could be produced. (Tr. at 30-31) As a result, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion as MOOT and ORDERS that the parties shall file a joint letter by no later than January 9, 2020, indicating: (a) whether Defendant has made this source code production or (b) if not, why not, and whether any further Court intervention is required. (2) As to "Specifications that relate specifically to the PMC[,]" (D.I. 426 at 2), the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. The Court understands that the parties do not disagree that at least some of the requested documentation is relevant; for its part, the Court agrees that Plaintiff has demonstrated relevance to the extent that it has explained why at least certain PMC specifications relating to the PMC's role in coordinating transitions to and from a low power state are relevant to Plaintiff's infringement allegations regarding the '331 patent. (Id.) In search of such relevant materials, Plaintiff initially made a very broad request for "[a]ll Specifications" relating to accused technologies. (Id., ex. 1 at 10) It then further attempted to refine that request here to one seeking: (a) three specifically identified specifications, (id. at 2 & ex. 17 at 2; Tr. at 36); (b) "PMC Firmware Architecture Specifications" and "PMC Hardware Architecture Specifications" more generally, (D.I. 426 at 2 (emphasis omitted)), or (c) that Defendant be ordered to search a particular database by keyword for "specifications created by [Defendant] that have the word or acronym PMC on the title page," (Tr. at 36). As for (a), Defendant has not articulated why those three specifications are irrelevant or would be unduly burdensome to produce; it should produce those documents if it can locate them. In the January 9 letter, Defendant shall indicate whether it has located these documents after a diligent search and (if so) if it has produced those documents. (Tr. at 32) As to (b), the Court agrees that Defendant should have to perform a further diligent search (e.g., via interviews with engineers) to reasonably attempt to target currently-unproduced specifications that are relevant to the infringement allegations regarding the '331 patent. During oral argument, Defendant asserted that it was in the process of doing so. (Tr. at 31, 39) Thus, in the January 9 letter, the parties shall update the Court as to Defendant's efforts in this regard, and whether they were (or were not) sufficient. As to (c), for the reasons set out in the Court's December 19, 2019 Oral Order, Defendant has sufficiently explained why it is unable to conduct such a search. (Tr. at 38) Thus, the Court will not order it to do so here.Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/2/2020. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 498
REDACTED VERSION of #488 Letter,, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 497
Joint MOTION for Discovery Teleconference - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 496
REDACTED VERSION of #489 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-13)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 495
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Request for Discovery Conference - re 491 Order Setting Teleconference,,,,,,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 494
Joint STIPULATION Regarding Deposition of Efraim Rotem by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #494 Stipulation Regarding Deposition of Efraim Rotem filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/27/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 493
REDACTED VERSION of #475 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 492
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' letter briefs regarding Defendant's request for a protective order preventing Plaintiff's deposition of Defendant's former CEO Brian Krzanich, (D.I. 449, 468) and having determined that the issues are clear and the decision is not a close call, HEREBY resolves Defendant's motion on the papers and ORDERS that today's teleconference is CANCELLED. Defendant's Motion is GRANTED for the following reasons: (1) The Court agrees with Defendant that the "apex doctrine" --- a doctrine that has previously been applied by other courts in this Circuit and by our Court in the past, see, e.g., In re Jevic Holding Corp., 526 B.R. 547, 556 (D. Del. 2014) (citation omitted); In re Intel Corp. Microprocessor Antitrust Litig., MDL Docket No. 05-1717-JJF, 2008 WL 5377979, at *3 (D. Del. Dec. 18, 2008) --- is appropriately utilized here. Thus, to the extent that Defendant demonstrates that the doctrine's factors militate in favor of its position, it has met its burden to show good cause for the protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). Cf. Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b) ("[T]he court must limit the frequency or extent of discovery [sought]... if [it]... is unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, or can be obtained from some other source that is more convenient, less burdensome, or less expensive[.]"); (2) Mr. Krzanich's status as a former CEO of Defendant does not suggest to the Court that the apex doctrine is any less applicable here, as the circumstances of such deposition requests still implicate the need to be mindful of preventing abuse and harassment as to such executives, and because Mr. Krzanich continues to serve at the "apex" (i.e., as CEO) of another corporate entity. (D.I. 449 at 1; Robertson v. McNeil-PPC Inc., No.LA CV 11-09050 JAK (SSx), 2014 WL 12576817, at *17 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 13, 2014)); (3) With regard to the areas of inquiry that Plaintiff seeks to press with Mr. Krzanich, (D.I. 468 at 2), it is abundantly clear that Mr. Krzanich does not have "unique" knowledge of these subjects. Jevic, 526 B.R. at 556. And while he might have some "personal" knowledge of the subject matter, id., the statements that Plaintiff relies on to demonstrate such knowledge are so high-level, generic and/or anodyne that were they sufficient to satisfy the apex doctrine's requirements, the doctrine would have no teeth at all. (See e.g., D.I. 468, ex. 4 (Plaintiff citing to an e-mail in which Mr. Krzanich was receiving requests for information from other Board members as to an issue, and where Mr. Krzanich did not independently know how to describe the issue and thus asked other Defendant employees who had more information about the issue to provide insight); id., ex. 5 (Plaintiff citing to an e-mail in which Mr. Krzanich states that he is "proud" of his employees for their work on a product); id., ex. 8 (Plaintiff citing to an e-mail message where Mr. Krzanich simply asks Defendant employees to read the company's Code of Conduct and emphasizes how important it is to abide by that document's contents).; (4) Relatedly, the information at issue surely could have been obtained from "lower[-]level [Defendant] employees or through less burdensome means[,]" Jevic, 526 B.R. at 556. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/23/2019. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 491
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties recent letters, (D.I. 479; D.I. 482), hereby ORDERS as follows: The parties should further meet and confer regarding the disputes set out in both letters. If they cannot reach agreement on all of the issues by December 27, 2019, the parties shall submit a joint letter with the text set out in the Courts standard Rule 16 Scheduling Order for Patent cases, listing the issues that remain in dispute. (If the parties can reach agreement on all issues, they should submit the joint letter on the same date, informing the Court of this instead.). If disputes remain: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website.; (2) A discovery dispute teleconference will be set for January 13, 2020 at 2:00 PM EST before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (3) By no later than January 3, 2020, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than January 9, 2020, the party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that partys reasons for its opposition.; (4) Two courtesy copies of the letters are to be hand-delivered to the Clerk's Office within one hour of e-filing.; (5) The Court may choose to resolve the disputes prior to the telephone conference. If it does so, it will cancel the conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/23/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 490
REDACTED VERSION of #468 Letter, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-9)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 489
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding Response to December 13, 2019 Memorandum Order - re #467 Memorandum and Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-13)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 488
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Response to the Court's December 13, 2019 Order - re #467 Memorandum and Order. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 487
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoena to GKC Partners II, LP by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 486
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoena to Gerchen Keller Capital, LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 485
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' December 19, 2019 letter, (D.I. 484), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by January 3, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/20/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 484
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Category B Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 483
AMENDED CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER re #481 Letter Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/19/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 482
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Response to Intel's December 18, 2019 Letter - re #479 Letter. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 481
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding Amended Claim Construction Order. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 480
ORAL ORDER The Court, having reviewed the parties' letters with regard to Plaintiff's first discovery dispute concerning Active Management Technology ("AMT") Specifications, (D.I. 426 at 1-2; D.I. 446 at 2-3), and having heard oral argument, (D.I. 459 (hereinafter "Tr.")), HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff's Motion is DENIED. It does so for the following reasons: (1) As to relevance, the Court understands (and Defendant has conceded) that at least certain aspects of Defendant's AMT technology (those relating to the transition from CM3 to CM0, i.e., into a low power mode, as well as more general information regarding AMT functionality necessary for Plaintiff to sufficiently evaluate liability and damages) are relevant to Plaintiff's allegations of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,523,331 (the "'331 patent"). (Tr. at 19; D.I. 446 at 2) Defendant has asserted that it has performed a reasonable search for such AMT Specification-related records and produced responsive documents, (see Tr. at 19-20, 23, 27-28; D.I. 446 at 2-3), and the Court has no basis to conclude that Defendant's search in this regard was unreasonable.; (2) However, Defendant asserts that to the extent Plaintiff's RFP 135 (which asks for "[a]ll [AMT] Specifications[,]" (D.I. 426, ex. 1 at 10)), calls for records beyond the type of AMT specification-related documents that Defendant has already produced, then the request is overbroad. Indeed, this type of request (i.e., for "[a]ll" such records) does seem very broad on its face. And the Court notes that Defendant did object to this request on overbreadth grounds, (id., ex. 2 at 11-12), and now argues that the request would sweep in vast amounts of AMT specification-related records that could not be shown to be relevant to the claims and defenses at issue here. (Tr. at 17 ([Defendant's Counsel: "[I]t's... quite a stretch to jump from the premise that we need documents that are responsive to the '331 patent... [to] saying that everything that has to do with AMT is relevant[.]"); see also id. at 20-21); (3) During oral argument, Plaintiff narrowed its request for not-yet-produced AMT specification records to only all "[AMT] documents that are [] titled 'specification'" and that are found in a particular Defendant database. (Tr. at 26-27) But even as to records fitting this somewhat narrower bill, the Court has no concrete indication that any or all such records are relevant to the claims and defenses at issue. Nor has Plaintiff sufficiently explained this to the Court. Put differently, Plaintiff has not sufficiently articulated to the Court why, if it is likely that there remain (a) certain currently un-produced AMT specification records; (b) that are found on the database in question and have "specification" in their title, then (c) such records are in fact likely to speak to AMT functionality that "allows for a remote administrator to access and do things with a system" while it is "functioning in a low power operating mode[.]" (Tr. at 7) Nor has Plaintiff sufficiently explained why any such AMT specification records on this database (beyond what Defendant has produced) are likely to relate to the "benefits" of AMT technology in a manner "relevant to [Plaintiff's] damages" case. (Tr. at 8); (4) Moreover, even if Plaintiff had better made these relevance connections for the Court, Defendant has additionally asserted that it is unable to search the database in question via the use of keywords for such records--- and that absent that ability, any requirement that it search for and produce all such currently-unproduced records would be unduly burdensome, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26. (Tr. a 27-28) Defendant's assertions as to the inability to keyword-search the contents of documents on the database are supported by a sworn declaration. (D.I. 447 at paras. 8-11; Tr. at 12-13) In contrast, the deposition testimony that Plaintiff relies on (in order to show that it should be easy to perform such searching) was more equivocal about how AMT specification information is stored on the database in question. (D.I. 426, ex. 13 at 155). Thus, based on the limited record before the Court, even if there was a reason to believe that there are relevant AMT-specification-related records located on the database in question, the Court is not persuaded that there is a reasonable, not-unduly-burdensome means for Defendant to locate and produce them. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/19/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 479
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding discovery issue with VLSI. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 478
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' December 17, 2019 letter, (D.I. 475), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by January 3, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/18/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 477
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' December 17, 2019 letter, (D.I. 474), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties need not provide any further joint updates to the Court concerning the subject matter discussed. If a discovery dispute concerning these topics arises, the parties shall file a letter notifying the Court. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/18/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 476
NOTICE of Lodging by Intel Corporation re Evidentiary Hearing (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A and Intel-Exhibit 26)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 475
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Requests for Production regarding Tools. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 474
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Category A Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 473
ORDER Setting Teleconference: A Telephone Conference is set for 1/6/2020 at 11:30 AM Eastern Time with Judge Mary Pat Thynge to discuss ADR. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the teleconference call. Signed by Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 12/17/19. (cak)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colm F. Connolly - Evidentiary Hearing held on 12/17/2019. (Court Reporter V. Gunning.) (nmf)
|
|
Filing 472
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Second Amended Exhibit 3 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 471
REDACTED VERSION of #452 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 470
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Efraim Rotem on December 27, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 469
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Efraim Rotem on December 18, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 468
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Michael J. Farnan regarding Response to Intel's Letter Request for Protective Order Preventing Deposition - re #449 Letter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 467
[UNSEALED] MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding discovery dispute. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/13/2019.This order has been emailed to local counsel. (mlc) Modified on 1/8/2020 (mlc).
|
|
Filing 466
REDACTED VERSION of #447 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 465
REDACTED VERSION of #448 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 464
REDACTED VERSION of #446 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-H)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 463
NOTICE of Intent to Request Redaction by Jeremy A. Tigan re #459 Transcript,,. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 462
REDACTED VERSION of #445 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 461
REDACTED VERSION of #449 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-B)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 460
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Jim Spehar on December 16, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 459
Official Transcript of discovery conference held on December 9, 2019 before Judge Burke. Court Reporter/Transcriber Valerie Gunning,Email: Valerie_Gunning@ded.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or order/purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/2/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/13/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/10/2020. (vjg)
|
|
Filing 458
REDACTED VERSION of #426 Letter,, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-23)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 457
Official Transcript of telephone conference held on November 14, 2019 before Judge Burke. Court Reporter/Transcriber Valerie Gunning,Email: Valerie_Gunning@ded.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or order/purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/2/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/10/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/9/2020. (vjg)
|
|
Filing 456
Official Transcript of telephone conference held on October 21, 2019 before Judge Burke. Court Reporter/Transcriber Valerie Gunning,Email: Valerie_Gunning@ded.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or order/purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/2/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/10/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/9/2020. (vjg)
|
|
Filing 455
Official Transcript of discovery conference held on June 18, 2019 before Judge Connolly. Court Reporter/Transcriber Valerie Gunning,Email: Valerie_Gunning@ded.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or order/purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 1/2/2020. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/10/2020. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/9/2020. (vjg)
|
|
Filing 454
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties letter briefs with regard to the dispute concerning the scheduling order, (D.I. 437; D.I. 452; see also D.I. 408), and having heard oral argument, HEREBY ORDERS that the case schedule shall be MODIFIED as follows: (1) The fact discovery cutoff shall be January 15, 2020; (2) The deadline for opening expert disclosures shall be January 20, 2020; (3) The deadline for rebuttal expert disclosures shall be March 17, 2020; (4) The deadline for reply expert disclosures shall be April 17, 2020; (5) The expert discovery cutoff shall be May 20, 2020; and (6) Dispositive motions shall be due on June 1, 2020. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/10/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke - Discovery Hearing held on 12/9/2019. The Court heard the parties' arguments regarding the parties' discovery disputes, (D.I. 410, 426 and 446; D.I. 420, 437 and 452). The Court took the matters under advisement. (Clerk, Schwerin) APPEARANCES: Brian Farnan, Christopher Abernathy, and Dominik Slusarczyk for Plaintiff; Jack Blumenfeld, Gregory Lantier, Richard Crudo, and Mashhood Rassam for Defendant. (Court Reporter Valerie Gunning) (dlb)
|
|
Filing 453
REDACTED VERSION of #437 Letter, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-11)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 452
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding the parties' requests to modify the case schedule. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-5)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 451
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter with regard to Plaintiff's discovery dispute, (D.I. 445; see also D.I. 343), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by December 17, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/6/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 450
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter with regard to Plaintiff's discovery dispute, (D.I. 444; see also D.I. 351, 385, 427), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by December 19, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/6/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 449
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding Discovery Dispute - re #341 Notice (Other). (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 448
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #446 Letter -- Declaration of Keith M. Bushell -- by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 447
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #446 Letter -- Declaration of Jayanth Vasisht -- by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 446
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding discovery dispute - re #426 Letter,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-H)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 445
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Requests for Production regarding Tools. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 444
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Update on Category B Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 443
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter with regard to Plaintiff's discovery dispute, (D.I. 441; see also D.I. 351, 376, 385, 405), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by December 17, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/4/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 442
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Sixth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 41-45), (2) Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Requests for Admissions (Nos. 1-45), and (3) Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Requests for Admissions (Nos. 46-489) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 441
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Michael J. Farnan regarding Update on Category A RFPs. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 440
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel's Sixth Set of Interrogatories (No. 43) and (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's Responses to Intel Corporation's Fourth Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 18-45) and Authentication Requests (Nos. 1-13) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 439
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian Driscoll of WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #439 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian Driscoll of WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/3/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 438
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Subpoena to LOT Network filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 437
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Extension of Discovery Schedule. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 436
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 22-42) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 435
REDACTED VERSION of #421 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 434
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Scott Lenker on 12/6/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 433
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Michael Zelikson on 12/5/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 432
REDACTED VERSION of #424 Notice (Other),, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A, 1-23, and B)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 431
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding Update on the Depositions of Nonparty Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 430
ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the parties' November 22, 2019 letter requesting a discovery teleconference. (D.I. #425 ) It hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a discovery dispute set out in the Scheduling Order, (D.I. 40), will be modified as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website.; (2) A discovery dispute teleconference is set for 12/23/2019 at 02:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (3) By no later than December 6, 2019, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than December 13, 2019, any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that its reasons for its opposition.; (4) Two courtesy copies of the letters are to be hand-delivered to the Clerk's Office within one hour of e-filing.; (5) The Court may choose to resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference. If it does so, it will cancel the conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/27/2019. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 429
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Eric Scheuerlein and Daylight Law, P.C. on December 4, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 428
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter with regard to Plaintiff's discovery dispute, (D.I. 421; see also D.I. 343), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by December 5, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/25/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 427
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter with regard to Plaintiff's discovery dispute, (D.I. 422; see also D.I. 351, 385), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by December 5, 2019.. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/26/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 426
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Discovery Dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 425
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Request for Discovery Teleconference. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 424
[SEALED] NOTICE of VLSI's Extrinsic Evidence Concerning the Term "Serial Communications Interface" by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Exhibit 19, #21 Exhibit 20, #22 Exhibit 21, #23 Exhibit 22, #24 Exhibit 23, #25 Exhibit B)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 423
STATEMENT -- Submission of Extrinsic Evidence for the "Serial Communications Interface" Limitation in U.S. Patent 6,212,633 -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 7-9, #2 Exhibit 10 (Part 1), #3 Exhibit 10 (Part 2), #4 Exhibits 13-25)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 422
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Joint Update regarding the Category B Requests. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 421
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Joint Update regarding Intel's Production in Response to VLSI's Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 420
MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 419
REDACTED VERSION of #402 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 418
ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the parties' November 19, 2019 letter requesting a discovery teleconference. (D.I. 408) It hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a discovery dispute set out in the Scheduling Order, (D.I. 40), will be modified as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website.; (2) The Court will hear this dispute during the discovery dispute teleconference that is already set for December 9, 2019 at 3:00 PM. (D.I. 392, D.I. 396; see also D.I. 404); (3) By no later than December 2, 2019, Plaintiff shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed two (2) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than December 6, 2019, Defendant may file a letter, not to exceed two (2) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining its reasons for its position.; (4) Two courtesy copies of the letters are to be hand-delivered to the Clerk's Office within one hour of e-filing.; (5) The Court may choose to resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference. If it does so, it will cancel this portion of the conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/22/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 417
REDACTED VERSION of #390 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-5)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 416
NOTICE to Take Deposition of James Kovacs on 12/4/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 415
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Second Amended Exhibit 5 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 414
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Second Amended Exhibit 4 to VLSI's Paragraph 4(c) Disclosures filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 413
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Matthew D. Felder on December 5, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 412
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Thomas M. Conte on December 5, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 411
SO ORDERED, re #409 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Complete Fact Discovery to December 19, 2019, Increasing the Number of Deposition Hours to 135 hours, and Setting Deadline in Part 3 of Court's April 22, 2019 Order as 15 days from Construction of "serial communications interface" filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/19/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 410
MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 409
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Complete Fact Discovery to December 19, 2019, Increasing the Number of Deposition Hours to 135 hours, and Setting Deadline in Part 3 of Court's April 22, 2019 Order as 15 days from Construction of "serial communications interface" to - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 408
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Request for Discovery Conference. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 407
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. on November 25, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 406
CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER (See order for details.) Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/18/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 405
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter with regard to Plaintiff's discovery dispute, (D.I. 401; see also D.I. 351), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by December 3, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/18/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 404
ORAL ORDER: With regard to the parties' discovery disputes to be heard on December 9, 2019, the Court sees that Defendant believes that some or all of those disputes (1) might not be ripe or (2) may be able to be resolved in the near term. (D.I. 381 at 1; see also D.I. 392). The Court encourages the parties to further discuss these issues, and HEREBY ORDERS that if the parties are able to resolve some or all of the disputed issues prior to the call, that they should inform the Court of that by letter. That said, the Court intends to go forward with the call on December 9 unless advised in advance that all of the disputes have been resolved. The Court also ORDERS that the parties' proposal for revised briefing deadlines, (D.I. 403), is ADOPTED. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/18/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 403
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadlines for the December 9, 2019 Discovery Hearing for: (i) Plaintiff's Opening Letter and (ii) Defendant's Answering Letter to (i) by Noon on November 25, 2019 and (ii) December 5, 2019 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 402
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Joint Update regarding Intel's Production in Response to VLSI's Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 401
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Joint Update regarding the Category A Requests for Production. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 400
PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Claim Construction Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 399
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Gerald Leatherman on 11/20/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 398
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Thomas Herrgott on 11/19/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 397
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Khee Whooi Lee on 11/21/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 396
ORAL ORDER Resetting Teleconference: At the request of counsel, the discovery dispute teleconference set for December 2, 2019 has been moved. A Discovery Conference is now set for 12/9/2019 at 03:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke. The previously required submission deadlines will remain the same. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/15/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 395
REDACTED VERSION of #381 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 394
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 393
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke - Discovery Dispute Teleconference held on 11/14/2019. The Court, having considered the parties' letters (D.I. 389, 390) and having heard oral argument, hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for a protective order and ORDERS the parties to further meet and confer to find a mutually agreeable date for deposition. (Clerk, Schwerin) APPEARANCES: Brian Farnan and Chris Abernathy for Plaintiff; Jack Blumenfeld, Amanda Major, and Mashhood Rassam for Defendant.(Court Reporter Valerie Gunning) (dlb)
|
|
Filing 392
ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the parties' November 8, 2019 letter requesting a discovery teleconference. (D.I. 381) It hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a discovery dispute set out in the Scheduling Order, (D.I. 40), will be modified as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website.; (2) A discovery dispute teleconference is set for December 2, 2019 at 3:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (3) By no later than November 20, 2019, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed four (4) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than November 26, 2019, any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed four (4) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that its reasons for its opposition.; (4) Two courtesy copies of the letters are to be hand-delivered to the Clerk's Office within one hour of e-filing.; (5) The Court may choose to resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference. If it does so, it will cancel the conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/14/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 391
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding Discovery Dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 390
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Michael J. Farnan regarding Discovery Dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 389
MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 388
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff's November 13, 2019 letter (D.I. 387), hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a discovery dispute set out in the Scheduling Order, (D.I. 40), will be modified as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burkes page on the District Courts website.; (2) A discovery dispute teleconference is set for November 14, 2019 at 2:00 pm, with Plaintiff's counsel to initiate the call.; (3) By no later than November 14, 2019 at 1:00 pm, the parties may each file letters no longer than two pages, single-spaced, outlining their respective positions on the issue. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 387
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Request for Discovery Teleconference. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 386
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Cadence Design Systems, Inc. on November 15, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 385
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (1) to submit the letter ordered by the Court concerning "Category A" document requests; and (2) to meet and confer and submit a joint status update to the Court with regard to the "Category B" document requests to November 15, 2019 and November 22, 2019, respectively - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #385 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME (1) to submit the letter ordered by the Court concerning "Category A" document requests; and (2) to meet and confer and submit a joint status update to the Court with regard to the "Category B" document filed by Intel Corporation. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/12/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 384
REDACTED VERSION of #371 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-13)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 383
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Paul S. Levy on November 12, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 382
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Nadav Shulman on November 12, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 381
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Requesting Discovery Conference. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 380
REDACTED VERSION of #372 Status Report by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 379
REDACTED VERSION of #370 Letter,, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-24)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 378
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 27-40) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #376 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Joint Letter Concerning Category A Document Requests to November 12, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/8/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 377
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 17-26) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 376
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Joint Letter Concerning Category A Document Requests to November 12, 2019 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 375
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Notice of Deposition of Intel Corporation Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(6) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
ORAL ORDER: Plaintiff shall submit no later than November 15, 2019 a proposed order for the Court to sign that sets forth the claim constructions adopted by the Court at the oral argument held on November 5, 2019. The parties shall submit by no later than November 22, 2019 any extrinsic evidence (other than live testimony) they wish the Court to consider in connection with the construction of the limitation "serial communications interface." A hearing will be convened on December 17, 2019 at 9:00 a.m., at which time the parties may adduce any oral testimony they believe should be considered by the Court in connection with the construction of the limitation "serial communications interface." Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/5/2019. (fms) Modified on 11/5/2019 (fms).
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colm F. Connolly - Markman Hearing held on 11/5/2019. (Court Reporter V. Gunning.) (fms)
|
|
Filing 374
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' joint letter with regard to Plaintiff's discovery dispute, (D.I. #372 ; see also D.I. 343), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by November 15, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/4/2019. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 373
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Gregory M. Bryant on 11/21/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Document Unsealed -- D.I. #363 Memorandum Order, unsealed. No redactions requested. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 372
[SEALED] STATUS REPORT by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 371
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding motion to strike - re #363 Memorandum and Order,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-13)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 370
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Response to the Court's October 25, 2019 Order - re #363 Memorandum and Order,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 369
REDACTED VERSION of #358 Notice (Other) by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 368
REDACTED VERSION of #357 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 367
NOTICE to Take Deposition of David Barnes on November 9, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 366
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Sixth Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 365
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Response to the Court's October 23, 2019 Order - re 351 Oral Order,,,,,,,,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 364
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Kevin Klein on October 30, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 363
[UNSEALED] MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding discovery disputes, (D.I. #345 MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes filed by VLSI Technology LLC). Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/25/2019.This order has been emailed to local counsel. (mlc) Modified on 11/4/2019 (mlc).
|
|
Filing 362
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Alon Naveh on 11/1/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 361
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding VLSI's Notice of Subsequent Evidence (D.I. 358). (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 360
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Fifth Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 359
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' October 24, 2019 letter, (D.I. 357), hereby ORDERS that, as proposed in the letter, the parties shall provide a further joint update on the subject matter discussed therein by November 1, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/25/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 358
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subsequent Evidence in Support of Opposition to Intel's Motion to Strike by VLSI Technology LLC re #325 Letter, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 357
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Michael J. Farnan regarding The Court's October 21, 2019 Order on Requests for Production - re 343 Oral Order,,,,,. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 356
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Fifth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 22-42) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 355
REDACTED VERSION of #326 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-8)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 354
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Daylight Law, P.C. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 353
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Eric Scheuerlein by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 352
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Aaron Waxler on November 5, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 351
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' letters with regard to Plaintiff's remaining discovery dispute (i.e., Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents responsive to its Fifth Set of RFPs (D.I. 319 at 2-3; D.I. 326 at 2-3)), hereby ORDERS that with regard to the remaining disputed RFPs (RFPs 189-95, 198, 200, 211, 213-14, 223-26, 233-34, 236-40, 243-50, 254-56, 258, 273, 277-79, 281, and 285, (D.I. 326 at 2), and RFPs 201, 215, 229-30, 235, 264, 267, 282, and 284 (id. at 3)): (1) Because the remaining disputes implicate 50 RFPs, a number too significant to address all at one time, Plaintiff will need to prioritize these RFPs for the Court.; (2) Therefore, by no later than October 28, 2019, Plaintiff shall submit a letter of no more than two single-spaced pages to the Court, in which it divides these RFPs into two categories: Category A and Category B. Category A should be the higher priority RFPs that Plaintiff wishes to be resolved first. Category B should be the remaining RFPs.; (3) By no later than November 7, 2019, Plaintiff and Defendant shall meet and confer with regard to the Category A RFPs, such that the parties have a fulsome discussion as to each RFP, which should include: (a) Plaintiff making clear what type/category of records/materials the RFP is actually seeking; and (b) Defendant making clear the nature of its objections, including why it thinks the RFP is overbroad, irrelevant or unduly burdensome. To the extent that after this meet-and-confer there remain disputes as to any of the Category A RFPs, then by no later than November 7, 2019, the parties shall submit to the Court a letter of no more than seven single-spaced pages that sets out in detail the parties analyses and arguments as to each remaining disputed RFP.; (4) As to the Category B RFPs, the parties shall engage in same type of meet-and-confer process described above, and submit the same type of letter described above, by no later than November 15, 2019. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/23/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 350
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Sixth Set of Interrogatories (No. 43); and (2) Intel Corporation's Fourth Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 18-45) and Authentication Request (Nos. 1-11) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 349
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Sixth Set of Interrogatories to Intel Corporation (Nos. 41-45); (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Requests for Admission to Intel Corporation (Nos. 1-45) and (iii) VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Requests for Admission to Intel Corporation (Nos. 46-489) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 348
REDACTED VERSION of #325 Letter, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-14)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 347
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christine E. Duh - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 346
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Amended Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories (No. 15-16) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #347 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christine E. Duh filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/22/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 345
MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Disputes - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 344
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Keith Gray on 10/25/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 343
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' letters with regard to Plaintiff's remaining discovery dispute (i.e., Plaintiff's motion to compel production of documents responsive to its Fifth Set of RFPs (D.I. 319 at 2-3; D.I. 326 at 2-3)), hereby ORDERS that with regard to the dispute over RFP Nos. 196-97, 199, 203, 208-09, 231, 270-72, 274, and 283: (1) By no later than October 24, 2019, the parties shall have further met and conferred, and shall submit to the Court a joint letter of no more than three single-spaced pages.; (2) In the joint letter, the parties shall report whether they have reached joint agreement on the timing of a schedule for Defendant to produce further responsive documents/records relating to these RFPs (and if so, setting out that jointly-agreed schedule).; (3) To the extent the parties have not completely agreed on the timing of such a schedule, they shall provide their respective proposals as to the timing of Defendant's future productions, with Defendant providing as much detail as possible regarding the expected content of those productions and an explanation as to why certain productions will require more time to complete than others. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/21/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 342
The Court hereby ORDERS, that by no later than 10/22/19, the parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website (as was required by the Courts prior 10/08/19 Oral Order). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/21/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 341
NOTICE of Subpoena to Brian Krzanich by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 340
REDACTED VERSION of #320 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 339
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Marcus May on October 23, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 338
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' letter briefs relating to certain discovery disputes, (D.I. 319; D.I. 320; D.I 325; D.I. 326), and having noted that one of the issues raised by both sides (the "Admitted Prior Art" issue) turns on District Judge Connolly's intent in issuing a prior discovery-related order in the case, has now conferred with Judge Connolly and confirmed that the intent of his June 19, 2019 Order, (D.I. 181 at para. 1), is as Defendant suggests. Therefore, with regard to this issue: (1) Plaintiff's motion to strike certain of Defendant's combinations in its Amended Identification of Prior Art is DENIED.; and (2) Defendant's request for an Order confirming that its amended disclosure complies with the District Court's June 19 Order is GRANTED. The Court will discuss the remaining discovery disputes with the parties during today's 1:00 pm teleconference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/21/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 337
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Fifth Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 336
REDACTED VERSION of #319 Letter, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-10)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke - Discovery Hearing held on 10/21/2019. The Court heard the parties' arguments regarding the parties' discovery disputes, (D.I. 319; D.I. 320; D.I. 325; D.I. 326). The Court took the matters under advisement. (Clerk, Schwerin) APPEARANCES: Brian Farnan, Christopher Abernathy, and Amy Proctor for Plaintiff; Jack Blumenfeld, William Lee, Amanda Major, Joshua Stern, and Mashhood Rassam for Defendant. (Court Reporter Valerie Gunning) (dlb)
|
|
Filing 335
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Fourth Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13) and (2) Intel Corporation's Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 15-16) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 334
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Scott Lenker on 11/15/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 333
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Thomas Hergott on 11/8/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 332
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Moonsoo Kang by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 331
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Mark Wilson on October 21, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 330
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Michael Stolarski and VLSI Technology LLC on October 17, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 329
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding request for oral argument - re #276 MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed . (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 328
ORAL ORDER Resetting Teleconference: At the request of counsel, the Discovery Dispute Teleconference set for 10/18/2019 has been moved to commence on 10/21/2019 at 01:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke. All other terms of the prior order (D.I. 300) scheduling the teleconference in this matter remain in effect. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/16/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 327
SO ORDERED, re #323 Stipulation Concerning Michael Zelikson's Deposition filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/16/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 326
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Discovery Disputes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-8)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 325
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Response to Defendant's October 11, 2019 Letter - re #320 Letter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 324
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Kevin Klein on October 30, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 323
STIPULATION concerning Michael Zelikson's Deposition by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 322
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel's Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 20-21) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #317 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin N. Ernst filed by Intel Corporation, #315 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Yung-Hoon Ha filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/15/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 321
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 189-285) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 320
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Discovery Disputes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 319
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Brian E. Farnan regarding Discovery Dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 318
REPLY BRIEF re #276 MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 317
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin N. Ernst - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 316
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Brendan Traw on 10/18/2019 (Second Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 315
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Yung-Hoon Ha - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
ORAL ORDER Re-Setting Scheduling Order Deadlines, The Markman Hearing originally set for 11/5/2019 at 1:00 p.m. is hereby rescheduled to 09:00 AM on the same date in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/11/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 314
NOTICE of Amended Subpoenas to Moonsoo Kang by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 313
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Kevin J. Hess on October 17, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 312
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Steve Cornelius on October 23, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 311
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Moonsoo Kang by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 310
REDACTED VERSION of #297 Answering Brief in Opposition, by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 309
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Interrogatories to Intel Corporation (Nos. 27-40) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 308
NOTICE of Subpoena to Marcus May by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 307
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Interrogatories to Intel Corporation (Nos. 17-26) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 306
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Mikal Hunsaker on 11/15/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 305
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Doug Ingerly on 10/30/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 304
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Gerald Leatherman on 10/28/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 303
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Stephen Gunther on 10/23/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 302
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Brendan Traw on 10/18/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 301
NOTICE to Take Deposition of William Stevens on 10/18/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 300
ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the parties' October 7, 2019 letter requesting a discovery teleconference regarding four discovery disputes. (D.I. #298 ) It hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a discovery dispute set out in the Scheduling Order, (D.I. 40), will be modified as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website.; (2) A discovery dispute teleconference is set for 10/18/2019 at 01:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (3) By no later than October 11, 2019, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. By no later than October 15, 2019, the party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that partys reasons for its opposition.; (4) Two courtesy copies of the letters are to be hand-delivered to the Clerk's Office within one hour of e-filing.; (5) The Court may choose to resolve the dispute prior to the telephone conference. If it does so, it will cancel the conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/8/2019. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 299
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLCs Responses to Intel Corporations Third Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 4-17) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 298
Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding Request for a Discovery Teleconference. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 297
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #276 MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 10/11/2019. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-4)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 296
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jeffrey A. Dennhardt of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #296 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jeffrey A. Dennhardt of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/4/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 295
REDACTED VERSION of #288 Proposed Order, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 294
REDACTED VERSION of #287 Reply Brief, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 293
REDACTED VERSION of #286 Reply Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 292
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Edward Burton on 11/18/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 291
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Varghese George on 11/11/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 290
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Alon Naveh on 11/4/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 289
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Khee Whooi Lee on 10/14/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
CORRECTING ENTRY: The pdf of the exhibits to the Sealed Reply at D.I. #287 have been replaced with a corrected version per request of filer. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 288
[SEALED] PROPOSED ORDER re #255 MOTION to Amend/Correct #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims --, #287 Reply Brief, by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 287
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #255 MOTION to Amend/Correct #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims -- filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-8)(Blumenfeld, Jack) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/26/2019) (nmf, ).
|
|
Filing 286
[SEALED] REPLY BRIEF re #257 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 285
REDACTED VERSION of #274 Declaration of Amy E. Proctor by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 284
REDACTED VERSION of #273 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 283
REDACTED VERSION of #278 Declaration,, of S. Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-29)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 282
REDACTED VERSION of #277 Opening Brief in Support, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 281
REDACTED VERSION of #275 Answering Brief in Opposition by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 280
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Defendant Intel Corporation's Corrected 30(b)(6) Notice to VLSI Technology LLC filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 279
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Fortress Investment Group LLC and Eran Zur on September 26, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Motions No Longer Referred: #276 MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed . The automatic referral to the magistrate judge generated by the system has been removed for this motion. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 278
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #277 Opening Brief in Support, of S. Adina Stohl by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 277
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #276 MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 10/4/2019. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 276
MOTION to Reintroduce Certain Asserted Patent Claims, or to Sever Such Claims into a Separate Action to be Stayed - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order, #2 Rule 7.1.1 Certification)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 275
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #257 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, filed by Intel Corporation.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/25/2019. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 274
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #273 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Amy E. Proctor by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 273
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #255 MOTION to Amend/Correct #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims -- filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/25/2019. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 272
SO ORDERED, re #266 Stipulated Amendment to Agreed Protective Order filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/18/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 271
REDACTED VERSION of #267 Notice to Take Deposition by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 270
REDACTED VERSION of #252 Notice to Take Deposition by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 269
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Robert Adler on 9/19/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 268
NOTICE of of Subpoenas to Jim Spehar by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 267
[SEALED] NOTICE to Take Deposition of VLSI Technology LLC on October 15-16, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 266
STIPULATION regarding Amendment to Agreed Protective Order re #96 Protective Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 265
REDACTED VERSION of #257 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B, #2 Rule 7.1.1 Certification, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 264
REDACTED VERSION of #256 Opening Brief in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 263
REDACTED VERSION of #255 MOTION to Amend/Correct #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-B)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 262
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 189-285) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 261
REDACTED VERSION of #251 Notice to Take Deposition by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 260
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Fourth Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 20-21) and (2) Intel Corporation's Third Set of Requests for Admission (Nos. 4-17) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 259
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Kevin Klein by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 258
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Paul S. Levy by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 257
[SEALED] MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint, - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Rule 7.1.1 Certification, #4 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 256
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #255 MOTION to Amend/Correct #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims -- filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/18/2019. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 255
[SEALED] MOTION to Amend/Correct #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim -- Motion for Leave to Amend Answer, Defenses, and Counterclaims -- - filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 254
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Fourth Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #253 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Amend Pleadings to September 4, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Set/Reset Scheduling Order Deadlines: ( Amended Pleadings due by 9/4/2019.). Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/3/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 253
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Amend Pleadings to September 4, 2019 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 252
[SEALED] NOTICE to Take Deposition of VLSI Technology LLC on October 15-16, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 251
[SEALED] NOTICE to Take Deposition of Intel Corporation on September 20, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 250
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Xiaoyu Ruan on September 13, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 249
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Ioannis Schoinas on September 6, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 248
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Arun Krishnamoorthy on September 5, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 247
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Marcus May by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 246
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Kevin J. Hess by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 245
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Matthew D. Felder by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 244
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Steve Cornelius by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 243
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Steven Brogden on September 6, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 242
NOTICE of Subpoena to NXP USA, Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 241
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Steven Gunther on 9/18/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 240
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Robert Adler on 9/19/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 239
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Moonsoo Kang on 10/3/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 238
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Keith Gray on 9/20/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 237
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Efraim Rotem on 10/17/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 236
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Doug Ingerly on 9/25/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 235
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Brendan Traw on 9/13/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 234
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel's Initial Trial Witness List filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 233
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Initial Tentative List of Fact Witnesses for Trial and (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's Second Amended and Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 232
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 15-16) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 231
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 143-147) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 230
STIPULATION to Modify Scheduling Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #230 STIPULATION to Modify Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/20/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 229
REDACTED VERSION of #223 Appendix,,,, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E, G, J, O-P, R, and Y, #2 VLSI-Exhibits 1-20, #3 Intel-Exhibits 1-9, #4 Intel-Exhibit 10 - Part 1 of 2, #5 Intel-Exhibit 10 - Part 2 of 2, #6 Intel-Exhibits 11-12)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 228
REDACTED VERSION of #222 Claim Construction Opening Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 227
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Ami Patel Shah on August 21, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 226
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Alexandra Amrhein of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP as co-counsel. Reason for request: Leaving Firm. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 225
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Aaron Waxler by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 224
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joshua L. Stern - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #224 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joshua L. Stern filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/14/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 223
[SEALED] APPENDIX re #222 Claim Construction Opening Brief by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit G, #7 Exhibit J, #8 Exhibit O, #9 Exhibit P, #10 Exhibit R, #11 Exhibit Y, #12 VLSI-Exhibit 1, #13 VLSI-Exhibit 2, #14 VLSI-Exhibit 3, #15 VLSI-Exhibit 4, #16 VLSI-Exhibit 5, #17 VLSI-Exhibit 6, #18 VLSI-Exhibit 7, #19 VLSI-Exhibit 8, #20 VLSI-Exhibit 9, #21 VLSI-Exhibit 10, #22 VLSI-Exhibit 11, #23 VLSI-Exhibit 12, #24 VLSI-Exhibit 13, #25 VLSI-Exhibit 14, #26 VLSI-Exhibit 15, #27 VLSI-Exhibit 16, #28 VLSI-Exhibit 17, #29 VLSI-Exhibit 18, #30 VLSI-Exhibit 19, #31 VLSI-Exhibit 20, #32 Intel-Exhibit 1, #33 Intel-Exhibit 3, #34 Intel-Exhibit 4, #35 Intel-Exhibit 5, #36 Intel-Exhibit 6, #37 Intel-Exhibit 7, #38 Intel-Exhibit 8, #39 Intel-Exhibit 9, #40 Intel-Exhibit 10 - Part 1 of 2, #41 Intel-Exhibit 10 - Part 2 of 2, #42 Intel-Exhibit 11, #43 Intel-Exhibit 12)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 222
[SEALED] Joint CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPENING BRIEF filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 221
NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Olga Musayev of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP as co-counsel. Reason for request: Leaving Firm. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #220 Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to file their Joint Claim Construction Brief to August 12, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/12/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 220
Joint STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to file their Joint Claim Construction Brief to August 12, 2019 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 219
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Michael Stolarski on September 24, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 218
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 217
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Fortress Investment Group LLC and Aaron Slan on August 16, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brian M. Weissenberg for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (myr)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #213 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian M. Weissenberg filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/6/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 216
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Rose Schooler on 8/16/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 215
ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the case history in light of the August 1, 2019 referral, hereby ORDERS that should counsel find, after good faith effortsincluding verbal communication among Delaware and Lead Counsel for all parties to the dispute that they are unable to resolve a discovery matter, the parties involved in the discovery matter dispute shall submit a joint letter with the text set out in the Courts standard Rule 16 Scheduling Order for Patent cases, which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Magistrate Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website. The moving party (i.e., the party seeking relief from the Court) should also file a Motion For Teleconference To Resolve Discovery Dispute. The suggested text for this motion can be found in the same Forms tab, under the heading Discovery Matters -- Motion to Resolve Discovery Dispute. The Court will thereafter set a discovery telephone conference. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/5/2019. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 214
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Claim Construction Sur-Reply Brief filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
The 9/4/2019 Discovery Conference set before Judge Connolly is cancelled per today's Oral Order referring all discovery disputes to Magistrate Judge Burke. (nmf)
|
|
ORAL ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke for all disputes relating to discovery and the protective order. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 8/1/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 213
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Brian M. Weissenberg - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 212
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Third Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 211
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's First Amended Infringement Contention Exhibits filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 210
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Interrogatories to Intel Corporation (Nos. 15-16) and (ii) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Fifth Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Intel Corporation (Nos. 189-285) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 209
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Felicia Ellsworth - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 208
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Mark Wilson on August 6, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 207
NOTICE to Take Deposition of John Rehberg on August 6, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 206
NOTICE to Take Deposition of David Barnes on August 6, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 205
NOTICE of Deposition Subpoena and Amended Document Subpoena to Peter Zawilski by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 204
NOTICE of Deposition Subpoena and Amended Document Subpoena to Kevin Lee Smith by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #209 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Felicia Ellsworth filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 7/23/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 203
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Fourth Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 143-147) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Reset Hearings: The Discovery Conference is rescheduled per request of counsel for 9/4/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. (nmf)
|
|
The 7/25/2019 Discovery Conference is postponed per request of counsel. It will be rescheduled soon. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 202
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Reply Claim Construction Brief; (ii) Declaration of Adina Stohl in Support of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Reply Claim Construction Brief; and (iii) Declaration of Dr. Thomas M. Conte in Support of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Reply Claim Construction Brief filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 201
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Wilson and Ham by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 200
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Larson Newman LLP by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 199
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Garlick & Markison by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 198
NOTICE of Subpoenas to Philips Intellectual Property and Standards by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 197
NOTICE of Subpoena to Peter Zawilski by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 196
NOTICE of Subpoena to Oren Reches by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 195
NOTICE of Subpoena to Mark Wilson by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 194
NOTICE of Subpoena to Kevin Lee Smith by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 193
NOTICE of Subpoena to John Rehberg by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 192
NOTICE of Subpoena to David Barnes by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 191
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's First Amended and Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 14) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Set Hearings: A Discovery Conference is set per request of counsel for 7/25/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 190
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Responsive Claim Construction Brief filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 189
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel Corporation's Amended Identification of Prior Art Combinations filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 188
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Third Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 187
REDACTED VERSION of #179 Letter by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 186
REDACTED VERSION of #178 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 185
REDACTED VERSION of #175 Letter by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 184
REDACTED VERSION of #173 Letter,,, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-29, #2 Certification of Counsel)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 183
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Lee Chastain on July 26, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 182
ORDER denying #174 Defendant's Motion to Compel. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/19/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 181
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #172 VLSI's MOTION for Discovery Conference. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 6/19/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colm F. Connolly - Discovery Conference held on 6/18/2019. (Court Reporter V. Gunning.) (nmf)
|
|
Filing 180
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel Corporation's Supplemental Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Paragraph 4(D) of the District of Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 179
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Michael J. Farnan regarding Response to Defendant's June 13, 2019 Letter - re #175 Letter. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 178
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding discovery dispute - re #173 Letter,,,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A-E)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 177
NOTICE of of Subpoena to Marc K. Furstein by Intel Corporation (Attachments: #1 Subpoena to Marc K. Furstein)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 176
NOTICE of Subpoena to Constantine M. Dakolias by Intel Corporation (Attachments: #1 Subpoena to Constantine M. Dakolias)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 175
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jeremy A. Tigan regarding discovery dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 174
MOTION to Compel Discovery - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 173
[SEALED] Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Michael J. Farnan regarding Discovery Dispute - re #172 MOTION for Discovery Conference . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Certification of Counsel)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 172
MOTION for Discovery Conference - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 171
NOTICE of Subpoena to Applied Materials, Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 170
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Opening Claim Construction Brief; (ii) Declaration of Adina Stohl; and (iii) Declaration of Dr. Thomas M. Conte filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 169
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Second Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 152-188) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 168
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) and (ii) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 15) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 167
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 166
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Lee Chastain on June 13, 2019 filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 165
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Second Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 164
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Second Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 1-94); (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's Second Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 95-129); and (iii) VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's Third Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 130-142) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Set Hearings: A Discovery Conference is set per request of counsel for 6/18/2019 at 04:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 163
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Ioannis Schoinas on 6/11/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 162
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Nadav Shulman on 6/5/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 161
NOTICE to Take Deposition of William Stevens on 6/3/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 160
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 152-188); (2) Intel Corporation's Second Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-70); (3) Intel Corporation's Second Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 71-132); (4) Intel Corporation's Second Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 133-151); and (5) Defendant Intel Corporation's Initial Identification of Prior Art Combinations filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 159
NOTICE of Subpoena to Samsung Electronics America, Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 158
NOTICE of Subpoena to Microsoft Corporation by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 157
NOTICE of Subpoena to Lenovo (United States) Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 156
NOTICE of Subpoena to HP Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 155
NOTICE of Subpoena to Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 154
NOTICE of Subpoena to Dell Technologies Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Robert J. Kent, Jr. for Intel Corporation added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 153
NOTICE of subpoena for testimony and the production of documents and things by Intel Corporation (Attachments: #1 Subpoena to Crane Payment Innovations, Inc.)(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #151 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Robert J. Kent filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/6/2019. (fms)
|
|
The 5/8/2019 Discovery Conference is cancelled per request of counsel as it is no longer needed. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 152
CLAIM Construction Chart by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X, #25 Exhibit Y, #26 Exhibit Z, #27 Exhibit AA, #28 Exhibit BB, #29 Exhibit CC)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
ORAL ORDER Rescheduling Hearings: The Discovery Conference is rescheduled for 5/8/2019 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 5/3/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 151
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Robert J. Kent - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 150
NOTICE of Subpoena to Intel Technology (US), LLC by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 149
NOTICE of Subpoena to Intel Technologies, Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 148
NOTICE of Subpoena to Intel Semiconductor (US) LLC by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 147
NOTICE of Subpoena to Intel International, Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 146
NOTICE of Subpoena to Intel Americas Inc. by VLSI Technology LLC (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 145
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 1-94) and (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 95-129) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 144
ANSWER to #128 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 143
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Third Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 142
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Initial Identification of Asserted Patent Claims Pursuant to the Court's April 22, 2019 Memorandum Order (D.I. 136) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 141
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Responses to Intel Corporation's Second Set of Requests for Admission (No. 3); (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's Responses to Intel Corporation's Third Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 130-142); and (iii) Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Responses to Intel Corporation's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 16-19) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 140
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Arun Krishnamoorthy on 5/20/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 139
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Xiaoyu Ruan on 5/16/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 138
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Michael Zelikson on 5/15/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 137
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 152-188) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 136
MEMORANDUM ORDER regarding limiting the number of claims and prior art references. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/22/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 135
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoena to Qualcomm Incorporated by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 134
NOTICE of Subpoena to International Business Machines Corporation by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
ORAL ORDER Rescheduling Hearings( The Markman Hearing is rescheduled due to a conflict in the Court's calendar for 11/5/2019 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly.) Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/16/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 133
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Brian E. Farnan regarding Intel's April 12, 2019 Letter. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 132
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding Intel's withdraw of its pending motion to consolidate the -966 and -426 Delaware actions - re (100 in 1:18-cv-00966-CFC, 8 in 1:19-cv-00426-CFC) MOTION to Consolidate Cases . (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 131
Letter to the Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding response to VLSI's April 8, 2019 Letter - re #127 Letter. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 130
REPLY BRIEF re #100 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 129
REDACTED VERSION of #119 Notice (Other) by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 128
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand , COUNTERCLAIM against VLSI Technology LLC by Intel Corporation.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 127
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Brian E. Farnan regarding Claim Narrowing Dispute. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 126
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Preliminary List of Claim Terms and Proposed Constructions Pursuant to Paragraph 8(a) of the Scheduling Order (D.I. 40) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 125
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel Corporation's Identification of Claim Terms Requiring Construction and Proposed Constructions filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 124
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Response to Intel's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 15) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 123
REDACTED VERSION of #121 Notice (Other) Subpoena to Gerchen Keller Capital, LLC by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 122
REDACTED VERSION of #120 Notice (Other) Subpoena to GKC Partners II, LP by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 121
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoena to Gerchen Keller Capital, LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 120
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoena to GKC Partners II, LP by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Iian D. Jablon for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg)
|
|
Set Hearings: A Discovery Conference is set per request of counsel for 5/8/2019 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 119
[SEALED] NOTICE of Submission of Hearing Presentation Slides by VLSI Technology LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 118
DECLARATION re (12 in 1:19-cv-00426-CFC) Answering Brief in Opposition, (117 in 1:18-cv-00966-CFC) Answering Brief in Opposition of Brian E. Farnan by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 117
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #100 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 4/10/2019. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colm F. Connolly - Status Conference held on 4/3/2019. (Court Reporter V. Gunning.) (nmf)
|
|
Filing 116
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Second Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #114 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Iian D. Jablon filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 4/1/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 115
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13), (2) Intel Corporation's Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 133-151), (3) Intel Corporation's Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 71-132), and (4) Intel Corporation's Amended Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-70) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 114
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Iian D. Jablon - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 113
NOTICE of Subpoena to Joseph Kessler by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 112
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's Second Set of Requests for Admission (No. 3), (2) Intel Corporation's Third Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 16-19), and (3) Intel Corporation's Third Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 130-142) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 111
ORDER granting #17 Motion to Dismiss Claims for Willful and Indirect Infringement under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/26/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 110
MEMORANDUM OPINION Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/26/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney S. Adina Stohl for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (ceg)
|
|
Filing 109
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Fourth Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Intel Corporation (Nos. 152-188) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #99 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney S. Adina Stohl filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/21/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 108
NOTICE of Subpoena to Eran Zur by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 107
NOTICE of Subpoena to Ami Patel Shah by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 106
NOTICE of Subpoena to Aaron Slan by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 105
NOTICE of Subpoena to Steve Brogden by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 104
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoena to NXP USA, Inc. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 103
[SEALED] NOTICE of Subpoena to Fortress Investment Group LLC by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 102
DECLARATION re (100 in 1:18-cv-00966-CFC, 8 in 1:19-cv-00426-CFC) MOTION to Consolidate Cases -- Declaration of Gregory H. Lantier -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-7)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 101
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #100 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 4/3/2019. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 100
MOTION to Consolidate Cases - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 99
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney S. Adina Stohl - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 98
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark N. Reiter and Omar F. Amin - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #98 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Mark N. Reiter and Omar F. Amin filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/18/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 97
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Requests for Admissions (Nos. 1-2) and (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's Responses to Intel Corporation's Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 95-129) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 96
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 3/13/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 95
NOTICE of Subpoena to Lee Chastain by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 94
NOTICE of Subpeona to Jennifer Wuamett by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 93
NOTICE of Subpoena to Changhae Park by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 92
PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Protective Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
The 3/18/2019 Discovery Conference is cancelled per request of Counsel as it is no longer needed. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 91
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel's Second Amended and Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the District of Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 90
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 14) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 89
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Robert Hesse on 3/20/2019 (Amended) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 88
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Initial Invalidity Contentions Pursuant to Paragraph 4(D) of the District of Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by Intel Corporation.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 87
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Second Set of Interrogatories (No. 15) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 86
NOTICE of Subpoena to UMC Group (USA) by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 85
NOTICE of Subpoena to STMicroelectronics, Inc. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 84
NOTICE of of Subpoena to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 83
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arthur W. Coviello - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #83 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Arthur W. Coviello filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 2/21/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 82
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 81
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (1) Intel Corporation's First Set of Requests for Admissions (Nos. 1-2) and (2) Intel Corporation's Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 95-129) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 80
NOTICE of Subpoena to Xilinx, Inc. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 79
NOTICE of Subpoena to Microchip Technology Inc. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 78
NOTICE of Subpoena to iSine, Inc. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 77
NOTICE of Subpoena to Texas Instruments, Inc. by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Set/Reset Hearings: A Discovery Conference is set per request of counsel for 3/18/2019 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 76
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 133-151) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 75
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Interrogatories to Intel Corporation (No. 14) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 74
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Preliminary Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 4(c) of the Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 73
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 71-132) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 72
NOTICE OF SERVICE of (i) VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14); and (ii) VLSI Technology LLC's Objections and Responses to Intel Corporation's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 1-94) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 71
NOTICE to Take Deposition of Robert Hesse on 2/11/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 70
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kevin A. Goldman - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #70 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Kevin A. Goldman filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/15/2019. (fms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #69 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Proposed Protective Order to January 25, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/14/2019. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 69
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Proposed Protective Order to January 25, 2019 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 68
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Amended and Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 67
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Requests for Production (Nos. 1-70) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #66 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph Mueller and Christa Laser filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/11/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 66
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Joseph Mueller and Christa Laser - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 65
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 1/11/2019 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #65 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 1/11/2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 1/4/2019. (fms)
|
|
Filing 64
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Third Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Intel Corporation (Nos. 133-151) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 63
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Proposed Protective Order to January 4, 2019 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #63 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Proposed Protective Order to January 4, 2019 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/28/2018. (fms)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #62 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/28/2018 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/27/2018. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 62
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/28/2018 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 61
NOTICE OF SERVICE of 1) Defendant Intel's Amended and Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the District of Delaware Default Standard for Discovery and 2) Intel Corporation's Supplemental Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 60
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Objections and Responses to VLSI Technology LLCs First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-13) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #59 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/21/2018 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/13/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 59
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/21/2018 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 58
NOTICE of Subpoena (NXP USA, Inc.) by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 57
NOTICE of Subpoena (Fortress Investment Group LLC) by Intel Corporation (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 56
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's Second Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Intel Corporation (Nos. 71-132) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 55
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-14) and Intel Corporation's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 1-94) filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 54
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/12/2018 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Christopher Abernethy for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #54 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/12/2018 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/4/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 53
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christopher Abernethy - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #53 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Christopher Abernethy filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 12/3/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 52
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Requests for Production to Defendant Intel Corporation (Nos. 1-70) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 51
ORAL ORDER: This matter has been referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for ADR. Counsel are to advise on or before Wednesday, December 12, 2018, by email to Judge Thynge, with a copy to her Judicial Administrator, Ms. Kennedy, as well as opposing counsel, their clients interest in mediation and the timing when mediation is preferred with a very brief explanation why. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 11/28/18. (cak)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #50 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregory H. Lantier, Richard A. Crudo, Dominic E. Massa, Alexandra Amrhein, S. Calvin Walden, Olga Musayev and Jason D. Kipnis filed by Intel Corporation. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/26/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 50
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Gregory H. Lantier, Richard A. Crudo, Dominic E. Massa, Alexandra Amrhein, S. Calvin Walden, Olga Musayev and Jason D. Kipnis - filed by Intel Corporation. (Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 49
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/4/2018 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #49 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 12/4/2018 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/20/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 48
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's First Set of Interrogatories to Intel Corporation (Nos. 1-13) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 47
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Intel's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the District of Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
Filing 46
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #44 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 11/20/2018 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/13/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 45
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Disclosure Pursuant to Paragraph 4(a) of the Delaware Default Standard for Discovery filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 44
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a Proposed Protective Order to 11/20/2018 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Leah Johannesson for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (lak)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #43 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Leah Johannesson filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 11/8/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 43
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Leah Johannesson - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 42
NOTICE OF SERVICE of VLSI Technology LLC's Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Fed R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) filed by VLSI Technology LLC.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 41
NOTICE OF SERVICE of Intel Corporation's Initial Disclosures filed by Intel Corporation.(Tigan, Jeremy)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for Mediation. Please see Standing Order dated January 20, 2016, regarding disclosure of confidential ADR communications. A link to the standing order is provided here for your convenience at # http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/general-orders/magistrate-judges-standing-order-adr-mediation (cak)
|
|
Filing 40
SCHEDULING ORDER: Case referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Joinder of Parties due by 8/30/2019. Amended Pleadings due by 8/30/2019. Discovery due by 11/21/2019. A Status Conference is set for 4/3/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly Dispositive Motions due by 6/1/2020. Joint Claim Construction Brief due by 8/9/2019. A Markman Hearing is set for 10/23/2019 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 10/15/2020 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. A Jury Trial is set for 11/2/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please note revisions to paragraphs 8 and 14. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/31/2018. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 39
ORDER denying #8 Motion to Transfer Case. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/29/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 38
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 10/29/2018. (fms)
|
|
Filing 37
PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Scheduling Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Colm F. Connolly - Oral Argument held on 10/11/2018, Scheduling Conference held on 10/11/2018. (Court Reporter V. Gunning.) (nmf)
|
|
Filing 36
PROPOSED ORDER Proposed Scheduling Order by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
ORAL ORDER Setting Hearings: An Oral Argument is set for 10/11/2018 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4B before Judge Colm F. Connolly re: #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The previously scheduled Rule 16(b) conference will be held immediately following Oral Argument on the Motion to Transfer. Ordered by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/26/2018. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 35
DECLARATION re #34 Reply Brief -- Declaration of Amanda L. Major -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 21-22)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 34
REPLY BRIEF re #17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 33
Order Setting Scheduling Conference: A Scheduling Conference is set for 10/11/2018 at 03:00 PM in Chambers before Judge Colm F. Connolly. The 9/21/2018 deadline to submit a proposed scheduling order set by Magistrate Judge Burke is vacated. Signed by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/19/2018. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 32
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Jack B. Blumenfeld regarding VLSI's September 18, 2018 letter - re #31 Letter. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 31
Letter to The Honorable Colm F. Connolly from Brian E. Farnan regarding September 21, 2018 Deadline to Submit Proposed Scheduling Order - re Oral Order,,,,,. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 30
DECLARATION re #29 Reply Brief -- Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-3)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 29
REPLY BRIEF re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Pro Hac Vice Attorney Dominik Slusarczyk,Amy Proctor,Morgan Chu,Charlotte J. Wen,Benjamin W. Hattenbach for VLSI Technology LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (dmp, )
|
|
Filing 28
DECLARATION re #27 Answering Brief in Opposition of Brian E. Farnan by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2)(Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 27
ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #17 MOTION to Dismiss filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/18/2018. (Farnan, Michael)
|
|
Filing 26
REDACTED VERSION of #23 Answering Brief in Opposition, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
ORAL ORDER by Judge Colm F. Connolly on 9/10/2018: In light of the reassignment of this case, the Court HEREBY ORDERS that the prior referral to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke is withdrawn, with the exception that any referral to Judge Burke for ADR shall remain in place. (nmf)
|
|
Filing 25
DECLARATION re #23 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Brian E. Farnan by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 19a, #21 Exhibit 19b, #22 Exhibit 19c, #23 Exhibit 19d, #24 Exhibit 19e, #25 Exhibit 19f, #26 Exhibit 20, #27 Exhibit 21, #28 Exhibit 22, #29 Exhibit 23, #30 Exhibit 24, #31 Exhibit 25, #32 Exhibit 26, #33 Exhibit 27, #34 Exhibit 28, #35 Exhibit 29, #36 Exhibit 30)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 24
DECLARATION re #23 Answering Brief in Opposition, of Michael Stolarski, by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Filing 23
[SEALED] ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed by VLSI Technology LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/11/2018. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #22 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Morgan Chu, Ben Hattenbach, Amy E. Proctor, Dominik Slusarczyk, and Charlotte J. Wen filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/4/2018. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 22
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Morgan Chu, Ben Hattenbach, Amy E. Proctor, Dominik Slusarczyk, and Charlotte J. Wen - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Case Reassigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
Filing 21
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Liv Herriot of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP - filed by Intel Corporation. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #21 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Liv Herriot of Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP filed by Intel Corporation. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/28/2018. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 20
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadlines: (i) for Plaintiff to to respond to Defendant Intel Corporation's Motion to Dismiss and (ii) for Defendant to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss to (i) 9/11/2018 and (ii) 9/25/2018 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #20 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadlines: (i) for Plaintiff to to respond to Defendant Intel Corporation's Motion to Dismiss and (ii) for Defendant to file its reply in support of the Motion to Dismiss to (i) 9/11/2018 and (ii) 9/25/201 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/23/2018. (dlb)
|
|
ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and discuss, in person and/or by telephone, each of the matters listed on Judge Burkes Case Management Checklist (Checklist). Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall jointly file the following: (I) a copy of the Checklist, indicating the names of Lead Counsel and Delaware Counsel for each party; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order consistent with Judge Burkes Rule 16 Scheduling Order Patent; and (iii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, that contains the following: (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties positions regarding any disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and (c) a list of the three most significant topics (other than Scheduling Order disputes) discussed during the parties review of the Checklist items, along with a brief description as to what was discussed as to those topics. Thereafter, the Court may schedule an in-person Case Management Conference/Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Burke. The Checklist and Rule 16 Scheduling Order Patent can be found on this Court's website (http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/judge/magistrate-judge-christopher-j-burke). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/22/2018. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 19
DECLARATION re #17 MOTION to Dismiss -- Declaration of Amanda L. Major -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-20)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 18
OPENING BRIEF in Support re #17 MOTION to Dismiss Claims for Willful and Indirect Infringement Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 9/4/2018. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 17
MOTION to Dismiss - filed by Intel Corporation. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 16
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadlines: (i) for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Intel Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue and (ii) for Defendant to file its reply in support of its Motion to (i) 9/4/2018 and (ii) 9/18/2018 - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #16 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to EXTEND the deadlines: (i) for Plaintiff to respond to Defendant Intel Corporation's Motion to Transfer Venue and (ii) for Defendant to file its reply in support of its Motion to (i) 9/4/2018 and (ii) 9/18/2018 filed by VLSI Technology LLC. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/20/2018. (mlc)
|
|
Filing 15
REDACTED VERSION of #11 Declaration by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 14
REDACTED VERSION of #9 Opening Brief in Support, by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
SO ORDERED, re #13 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jordan L. Hirsch, William F. Lee, Amanda L. Major, David C. Marcus, Mark D. Selwyn, Louis W. Tompros, and Kathryn Zalewski filed by Intel Corporation. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/13/2018. (jcs)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jordan L. Hirsch, William F. Lee, Amanda L. Major, David C. Marcus, Mark D. Selwyn, Louis W. Tompros, and Kathryn Zalewski - filed by Intel Corporation. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 12
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 11
[SEALED] DECLARATION re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- Declaration of Thomas Herrgott -- by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 10
DECLARATION re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California -- Declaration of Mark D. Selwyn -- by Intel Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - 43)(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 9
[SEALED] OPENING BRIEF in Support re #8 MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California filed by Intel Corporation.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 8/20/2018. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION to Transfer Case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California - filed by Intel Corporation. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Related Action by Intel Corporation (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
Filing 6
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the complaint to August 20, 2018 - filed by Intel Corporation. (Blumenfeld, Jack)
|
|
REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:#http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (dlb)
|
|
SO ORDERED D.I. #6 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the complaint to August 20, 2018 filed by Intel Corporation. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/6/2018. (dlb)
|
|
REMARK: If the parties jointly consent to have a Magistrate Judge conduct all proceedings in this case, including trial, then when Judge Burke enters a case schedule he will enter the respective pre-trial conference and trial dates onto his calendar and will honor them. Otherwise, in accordance with the District Court's procedures for "Assignment of Cases to Visiting Judges" (issued on May 26, 2017 and available on the District Court's website), then upon the filing of a case-dispositive motion (e.g., a motion to dismiss, a motion for judgment on the pleadings, a motion for summary judgment, or initiation of the claim construction process in a patent case), VAC cases will be considered ready for reassignment to a visiting District Judge. Whether the pre-trial conference and trial dates will stand after reassignment will depend on the availability of those dates on the visiting District Judge's calendar. (dlb)
|
|
Filing 5
Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent CF VLSI Holding LLC for VLSI Technology LLC filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Case Assigned to Vacant Judgeship (2017). Please include initials of VAC after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb)
|
|
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke. (This matter has been assigned to the Vacant Judgeship and referred to a Magistrate Judge for handling through case-dispositive motions. The Magistrate Judge has full authority permitted by law to manage this matter, including entering schedules through trial, deciding non-dispositive matters and making recommendations as to the resolution of dispositive matters. Litigants and counsel are reminded that they have the option of consenting to the Magistrate Judge to handle the case in full, including trial, or consenting to having a particular motion resolved by the Magistrate Judge.) (rjb)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by VLSI Technology LLC. Intel Corporation served on 6/29/2018, answer due 7/20/2018. (Farnan, Brian)
|
|
Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Intel Corporation on 6/29/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (crb)
|
|
Filing 3
Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,212,633 B1 ;US 7,246,027 B2 ;US 7,247,552 B2 ;US 7,523,331 B2 ;US 8,081,026 B1. (crb)
|
|
Filing 2
Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (crb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Intel Corporation - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2410729.) - filed by VLSI Technology LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(crb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/29/2018: #6 Exhibit 5) (ceg).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Delaware District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
