GRAPEVINE IMPORTS, LTD. v. USA
| GRAPEVINE IMPORTS, LTD. |
| USA |
| 1:2005cv00296 |
| March 11, 2005 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Francis M. Allegra |
| Land Condemnation |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
ORDER re: 93 MANDATE of CAFC dismissing with prejudice. This court's opinion of July 17, 2007, and the judgment issued thereon, remains in effect. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting 85 Motion for Entry of Judgment. The Clerk is directed to dismiss the claims involving the 1999 federal income tax liability. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment for dismissal pursuant to RCFC 58 involving the year 2000 federal income tax liability. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si)
|
| Search for this case: GRAPEVINE IMPORTS, LTD. v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: GRAPEVINE IMPORTS, LTD. | |
| Represented By: | Michael Todd Welty |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Grover Hartt, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
