CEBE FARMS, IND., et al v. USA
| CEBE FARMS, IND. and JOSEPH CEBE |
| USA |
| 1:2005cv00965 |
| September 2, 2005 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Margaret M. Sweeney |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
165
DOCKETED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES: PUBLISHED OPINION AND ORDER denying 58 and 72 defendant's motions for summary judgment, and denying 79 plaintiffs' cross-motion for summary judgment. The parties shall file by no later than Friday, June 27, 2014 a joint status report setting forth their proposed schedule for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (ta) Copy to parties. (Entered: 05/28/2014)(ac7) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
152
ORDER granting 138 Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Permitting Amendment of Certain Denials in Their Responses to Defendant's Requests for Admission. Joint status report indicating whether supplemental briefing is necessary in light of plaintiffs' amended denials and, if so, proposing a supplemental briefing schedule due by 8/24/2012. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (rac)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER permitting plaintiffs to amend their complaint with respect to their first cause of action. If plaintiffs amend their complaint, then they shall file a second amended complaint by 2/24/2012. If plaintiffs file a second amended complaint, then defendant shall file its answer by 3/30/2012. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (rac)
|
|
Filing
54
PUBLISHED OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 34 Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and granting 49 Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Amend Complaint. Plaintiffs' amended complaint due by 8/29/2008. Joint status report due by 10/31/2008. Signed by Judge Margaret M. Sweeney. (rac)
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
