VEGA v. USA
| BARUCH VEGA |
| USA |
| 1:2007cv00685 |
| September 21, 2007 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| James F. Merow |
| Death Penalty |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 15 Motion for Relief from Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER entered: (1) Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in that Vega's Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (RCFC 12(b)(6)) and plaintiff's actions in proposing to file an Amended Complaint, but not res ponding when provided extended time for this pleading, also supports dismissal pursuant to RCFC 41(b). (2) The Clerk shall enter final judgment dismissing plaintiff's Complaint with no costs assessed. Signed by Senior Judge James F. Merow. (lae)
|
| Search for this case: VEGA v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: BARUCH VEGA | |
| Represented By: | Richard John Diaz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Steven Michael Mager |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
