HALL v. USA
| DAWN HALL |
| USA |
| 1:2009cv00239 |
| April 20, 2009 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Bohdan A. Futey |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
granting 19 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 21 Motion for Summary Judgment; PUBLISHED OPINION. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Sr. Judge Bohdan A. Futey. (mp1) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
18
SCHEDULING ORDER:Discovery completed by 2/7/2011. Dispositive motions due by 3/14/2011. Responses due by 4/11/2011. Replies may be filed by 4/25/2011. Signed by Sr. Judge Bohdan A. Futey. (nm)
|
|
Filing
9
PUBLISHED OPINION granting 5 Motion to Dismiss - Rule 12(b)(1) and (6); denying 8 Motion for Oral Argument; ORDER of Dismissal. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Sr. Judge Bohdan A. Futey. (mp1)
|
| Search for this case: HALL v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: DAWN HALL | |
| Represented By: | Richard A. Regnier |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Elizabeth Anne Speck |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
