STUART v. USA
MICHAEL E. STUART |
USA |
1:2010cv00859 |
December 14, 2010 |
United States Federal Claims Court |
COFC Office |
None |
Bohdan A. Futey |
Mary Ellen Coster Williams |
Military Pay - Back Pay |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 85 REPORTED OPINION denying as moot 45 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; denying as moot 48 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting 71 Motion for Leave to File; denying in part 73 Motion for Sanctions pursuant to Rule 37. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (jh) Copy to parties. |
Filing 39 PUBLISHED OPINION denying 17 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record; granting in part 21 Cross Motion. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (tb1) Copy to parties. |
Filing 15 PUBLISHED OPINION denying 10 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Mary Ellen Coster Williams. (jk2) Copy to parties. |
Search for this case: STUART v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: MICHAEL E. STUART | |
Represented By: | Jason Ellis Perry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: USA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.