KATZIN et al v. USA
| RICHARD LEWIS KATZIN, MARY BETH KATZIN-SIMON, ANNETTE KATZIN and ROSEMARIE KJELDSEN |
| USA |
| 1:2012cv00384 |
| June 15, 2012 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| COFC Office |
| None |
| Charles F. Lettow |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
142
REPORTED OPINION: The court finds that the plaintiffs have suffered a permanent physical taking of their property interests for which just compensation is due. The court awards the plaintiffs $610,962.97, measured by the size of the property tak en (10.31 cuerdas or 10.01 acres) multiplied by a per-cuerda property value of $59,259.26. The court also awards interest on that amount at the rate of return reflected by the Moody's Long-Term Aaa Corporate Bond Index, compounded quarterly , from June 22, 2006 to the date the judgment is actually paid. Final judgment to this effect shall be issued under RCFC 54(b) because there is no just reason for delay. The clerk shall enter final judgment as specified. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (aj)
|
|
Filing
135
UNREPORTED ORDER: The 119-page post-trial brief of the government in this case is greatly in excess of the 40-page limitation in RCFC 5.4(b)(1). Nonetheless, the court allows the filing as a matter of grace, with the caveat that no such leave will be granted in the future. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (aj)
|
|
Filing
95
REPORTED OPINION: For reasons stated, the government's motion in limine 82 is DENIED. The government's motion for an order to allow Dr. Jorge Orbay to testify via video teleconference from a federal courthouse in Miami, Florida 86 is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (aj)
|
|
Filing
61
REPORTED OPINION and ORDER: The government's motion to strike the declaration of Mr. Dennis Martinez and the Armar title report under RCFC 56(c)(4) is DENIED. The government's motion to dismiss the amended complaint pursuant to RCFC 12(b)( 1) is DENIED. The Katzins' claim is not time-barred under 28 U.S.C. § 2501, and the equitable doctrine of laches does not apply to shorten the period for bringing suit. The government's motion for summary judgment under RCFC 56 is DENIED because disputed issues of material fact exist regarding ownership of the relevant land. The parties are requested to provide by 4/2/2015 a plan and schedule for bringing this case to trial. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (co)
|
|
Filing
39
REPORTED OPINION granting 34 Motion to Amend Pleadings - Rule 15(b). Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (zlr)
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
