INSIGHT SYSTEMS CORP. v. USA
| INSIGHT SYSTEMS CORP. |
| USA |
| 1:2012cv00863 |
| December 11, 2012 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| None |
| Francis M. Allegra |
| Contract - (Pre Award) Injunctions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
(REDACTED)OPINION re: 74 SEALED**OPINION and ORDER denying 58 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 59 Motion for Attorney Fees; denying 63 Motion for bid preparation and proposal costs. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
61
ORDER granting 60 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response re 58 MOTION for Attorney Fees , 59 MOTION for Attorney Fees , 60 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time until 9/18/2013 to File Response as to 59 MOTION for Attorney Fees , 58 MOTION for Attorney Fees DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTION TO FILE CONSOLIDATED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS MOTIONS FOR AT; Response due by 9/18/2013. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
57
PUBLISHED (Reissued) OPINION. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (Allegra, Francis) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
48
ORDER Setting Hearing on Motion 47 CROSS MOTION and RESPONSE to 41 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record filed by INSIGHT SYSTEMS CORP. 39 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record filed by CENTERSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.: Oral Argument set for 3/5/2013 at 10:00 AM (EST)in National Courts Building before Judge Francis M. Allegra. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
45
AMEND 36 SCHEDULING ORDER: Cross Motions due by 2/8/2013. Replies due by 2/19/2013. Replies in support of its cross-motions due by 3/1/2013. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
36
SCHEDULING ORDER: Brief due by 1/25/2013. Cross Motions due by 2/8/2013. Replies in support of their motions and responses due by 2/18/2013. Replies in support of its cross-motions due by 2/28/2013. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
21
SCHEDULING ORDER: Administrative Record in CD-ROM due by 1/8/2013. Brief due by 1/22/2013. Cross Motions due by 2/5/2013. Reply to their motions and response due 2/15/2013. Replies in support of its cross-motions due 2/25/2013. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
18
STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephonic Status Conference set for 12/20/2012 at 2:00 PM (EST) before Judge Francis M. Allegra. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
14
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
11
SPECIAL PROCEDURES ORDER. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
|
Filing
10
STATUS CONFERENCE ORDER: Telephonic Status Conference set for 12/13/2012 at 10:00 AM (EST)before Judge Francis M. Allegra. Signed by Judge Francis M. Allegra. (si) Copy to parties.
|
| Search for this case: INSIGHT SYSTEMS CORP. v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: USA | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Paul Roche |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: INSIGHT SYSTEMS CORP. | |
| Represented By: | Richard J. Webber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
