SANDOVAL et al v. USA
Plaintiff: ARMONDO SANDOVAL and YADIRA SANDOVAL
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2013cv00095
Filed: February 4, 2013
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
County: None
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Lettow
Nature of Suit: Tax - Income, Individual

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 25, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 68 REPORTED OPINION granting 56 Motion for Summary Judgment: The governments motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and the plaintiffs cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The clerk shall enter judgment for the government and against the plaintiffs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow.(es)
Search for this case: SANDOVAL et al v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARMONDO SANDOVAL
Represented By: Sean H. Colon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: YADIRA SANDOVAL
Represented By: Sean H. Colon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Sarah Starling Marshall
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?