JORDAN v. USA
Plaintiff: MARLENE JORDAN
Defendant: USA
Case Number: 1:2013cv00995
Filed: December 16, 2013
Court: United States Federal Claims Court
Office: COFC Office
County: None
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Lettow
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 59 REPORTED OPINION, reflecting no redactions from the opinion and order previously entered under seal on July 17, 2015. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (gk)
January 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 28 REPORTED OPINION denying 15 Motion to Dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 16 Motion to Amend/Correct. Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED, plaintiff's cross-motion for leave to file an amended complaint is GRANTED, plaintiff's cross-motion to compel is DENIED as moot, and plaintiff's motion for sanctions is DENIED. Signed by Judge Charles F. Lettow. (gk)
Search for this case: JORDAN v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MARLENE JORDAN
Represented By: Judith A. Lonnquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: USA
Represented By: Joshua A. Mandlebaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?