BISHOP v. USA
| LE MYRON DESHE BISHOP and LEMYRON BISHOP |
| USA |
| 1:2023cv00783 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| United States Federal Claims Court |
| Eleni M Roumel |
| Miscellaneous - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1491 Tucker Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
JUDGMENT entered, pursuant to Rule 58, dismissing plaintiff's complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction under Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(h)(3). (Service on parties made.) (dls)
|
|
Filing 12
REPORTED OPINION dismissing #1 Plaintiff's Complaint, and granting #11 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter Judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (lb) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 11
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, filed by LEMYRON BISHOP. Service: 6/30/2023. Response due by 7/17/2023.(sh)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER. The document specified in the attached Deficiency Memorandum shall be rejected. The Clerk of Court is directed to reject the filing. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (Attachments: #1 Deficiency Memorandum) (smh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER. The document specified in the attached Deficiency Memorandum shall be rejected. The Clerk of Court is directed to reject the filing. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (Attachments: #1 Deficiency Memorandum) (smh) Service on parties made.
|
|
Filing 8
Electronic Notification Consent Form. filed by LeMyron Bishop. (sh)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah E. Kramer for USA . (Kramer, Sarah)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER directing Plaintiff to pay filing fees or file application to proceed in forma pauperis by July 10, 2023. Signed by Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (smh) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via certified mail on 6/9/2023. Tracking # 7018 2290 0000 5183 7313. (fm).
|
|
Filing 5
GENERAL ORDER No. 2022-01 dated 9/12/2022 continuing the suspension of paper filing requirements in pro se cases: Consistent with this court's General Orders issued on 3/18/2020, 11/13/2020, 12/23/2020, and 3/3/2021, it is ordered that judges, special masters, the Clerk of Court, and counsel of record for the United States may file electronically in pro se cases using the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Filing (CM/ECF) system. Pro se litigants shall, absent extraordinary circumstances, submit all case filings via e-mail to ProSe_case_filings@cfc.uscourts.gov. Pro se litigants may, if feasible, receive notification by e-mail of all electronic filings by filing an E-Notification Consent Form, attached to the General Order. Signed by Chief Judge Elaine D. Kaplan. (sh) Service on parties made. Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.05.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/5/2023 (cam).
|
|
Filing 4
**FILING FEE DUE.** Our records indicate that a filing fee has not been received. Plaintiff must submit either the required filing fee of $402.00 OR an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which can be located under the forms link at: #www.uscfc.uscourts.gov. Please contact the Clerk's Office at 202-357-6406 for any additional assistance. (sh) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.05.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/5/2023 (cam).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Non-ECF Case. (sh) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.05.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/5/2023 (cam).
|
|
Filing 2
Notice of Random Assignment Pursuant to Rule 40.1(a) to Judge Eleni M. Roumel. (sh) Plaintiff served via first class mail on 06.05.2023 (cam). Modified on 6/5/2023 (cam).
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against USA (O) (Copy Served Electronically on Department of Justice), filed by LE MYRON DESHE BISHOP.Answer due by 7/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(sh) #2 Envelope) (sh).
|
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
