Sliney v. Secretary, DOC et al
| 2:2006cv00670 |
| December 18, 2006 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| Unassigned Judge |
| Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
OPINION AND ORDER dismissing 42 Motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60; denying as moot 43 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/18/2024. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
27
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 9/24/2010. (BGS)
|
|
Filing
25
OPINION AND ORDER. The Florida Attorney General is DISMISSED as a named Respondent. Grounds One, Three, Four, and Five of the Petition are DISMISSED with prejudice as procedurally defaulted. Grounds Two and Six of the Petition are DENIED on the m erits with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate all pending motions, enter judgment accordingly, and CLOSE this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petitioner IS NOT entitled to a certificate of appealability and IS NOT entitled to appeal in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Charlene E. Honeywell on 9/22/2010. (BGS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sliney v. Secretary, DOC et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
