Daniels v. National City Mortgage
Plaintiff: Gregory Daniels
Defendant: National City Mortgage
Case Number: 2:2008cv00743
Filed: October 1, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending Office
County: Charlotte
Presiding Judge: Sheri Polster Chappell
Presiding Judge: John E. Steele
Nature of Suit: None
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION AND ORDER granting 25 Motion to dismiss and the 20 Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice with leave to file a second amended complaint within 20 days of this Opinion and Order. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 8/20/2009. (RKM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniels v. National City Mortgage
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gregory Daniels
Represented By: Alan E. Tannenbaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National City Mortgage
Represented By: Richard Oliver
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?