Lee Memorial Health System v. Jeffery et al
| Lee Memorial Health System |
| David L. Jeffery, Maria Jeffery, Jane Doe, Kimberly Brea and Alex Brea |
| 2:2008cv00843 |
| November 7, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Constitutional - State Statute Office |
| Lee |
| Douglas N. Frazier |
| John E. Steele |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
120
OPINION AND ORDER granting 111 Suggestion of Mootness/Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction; dismissing 46 Second Amended Complaint without prejudice. The Clerk shall terminate defendants, terminate all deadlines and motions (terminating 84 Motion for summary judgment; terminating 85 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; terminating 91 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings) and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 7/6/2010. (RKR)
|
|
Filing
108
OPINION AND ORDER denying 53 Motion for abstention; denying 54 Motion for abstention; denying 64 Motion to certify class. The Second Amended Complaint is dismissed as to defendants David L. Jeffery, as personal representative of the estate of Percy I. Jeffery, Jr., and Maria Jeffery since the case is moot as to these defendants. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 3/30/2010. (RKR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
