Gomes v. Tant's 60 Minute Cleaners, Inc. et al
| Shirley Gomes |
| Tant's 60 Minute Cleaners, Inc. and Nancy Cindy Tant |
| 2:2009cv00359 |
| June 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Broward |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| John E. Steele |
| Plaintiff |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 206 Collect Unpaid Wages |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
OPINION AND ORDER adopting and incorporating 28 Report and Recommendations; granting 27 Notice of filing, construed as a motion to approve settlement. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, terminate all pending deadlines and the 11 Motion to dismiss, and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 12/4/2009. (RKM)
|
|
Filing
28
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Respectfully Recommended: The Notice of Filing the Parties' Settlement Agreement and Response to the Court's October 30, 2009, Order in Connection with the Parties' Settlement (Doc. #27) should be GRANTED. Th e Settlement Agreement should be approved as fair and reasonable and the Court should enter a Final Order of Dismissal with Prejudice. Failure to file written objections to the proposed findings and recommendations contained in this report within ten (10) days from the date of its filing shall bar an aggrieved party from attacking the factual findings on appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 11/19/2009. (LAF)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
