Whitson v. Chicks Ahoy, Inc. et al
Lyla Whitson |
Chicks Ahoy, Inc., Bonnie G. Grunberg and Tammie J. Shockey |
2:2009cv00739 |
November 9, 2009 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Ft. Myers Office |
Lee |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
John E. Steele |
Plaintiff |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 OPINION AND ORDER granting 15 Motion to Approve Settlement; adopting and incorporating 17 Report and Recommendations; approving settlement as fair and reasonable. The Clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the case with prejudice, except as otherwise provided by the settlement agreement. The Clerk is further directed to terminate all pending matters as moot and to close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 2/8/2010. (RKR) |
Filing 17 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 15 Joint MOTION to Approve Settlement filed by Tammie J. Shockey, Bonnie G. Grunberg, Chicks Ahoy, Inc. It is respectfully recommended the Joint Motion for Approval of FLSA Settlement (Doc. #15) should be GRANTED and t he settlement agreement should be APPROVED by the District Court. It is further respectfully recommended the case should be DISMISSED with Prejudice pursuant to the agreement of the Parties and the Clerk should be directed to close the file. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 1/21/2010. (LMH) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.