Boston v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office
| Thaddeus Boston |
| Charlotte County Sheriff's Office |
| 2:2010cv00557 |
| September 10, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Charlotte |
| Sheri Polster Chappell |
| John E Steele |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2010. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 JUDGMENT (Signed by Deputy Clerk) (SPB) |
Filing 9
OPINION AND ORDER adopting #8 Report and Recommendations; denying #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing case without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 11/8/2010. (RKR)
|
| Filing 8 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #1 Complaint filed by Thaddeus Boston, #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Thaddeus Boston. It is respectfully recommended the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. #2) should be DENIED and the case DISMISSED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 10/20/2010. (LMH) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER ruling deferred #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pending the filing of the Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. The Plaintiff has up to and including October 15, 2010, to file his Amended Complaint in compliance with the instructions provided above. Failure to comply with the directions provided in this Order may result in the Plaintiff's Complaint being dismissed. Plaintiff's request that the Court appoint him legal counsel is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 9/16/2010. (LMH)
|
| Filing 6 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 9/29/2010. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 9/15/2010. (LMH) |
| Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 9/27/2010. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 9/15/2010. (LMH) |
| Filing 4 STANDING ORDER: Filing of documents that exceed twenty-five pages. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 12/7/09. (SPB) |
| Filing 3 AFFIDAVIT of indigency by Thaddeus Boston. (SPB) |
| Filing 2 APPLICATION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis by Thaddeus Boston. (SPB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Sheri Polster Chappell. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Charlotte County Sheriff's Office filed by Thaddeus Boston.(SPB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Boston v. Charlotte County Sheriff's Office | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Thaddeus Boston | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Charlotte County Sheriff's Office | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
