McAllister v. Lee County, Florida Board of County Commissioners et al
| Arnold McAllister |
| Lee County, Florida Board of County Commissioners, Kim Dickerson and Christine Brady |
| 2:2014cv00403 |
| July 21, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Ft. Myers Office |
| Lee |
| John E. Steele |
| Carol Mirando |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
ORDER granting 31 Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines in the Case Management and Scheduling Order and to Continue the Final Pretrial Conference and Trial and Memorandum of Law in Support. An Amended Case Management and Scheduling Order will be issued by separate order. All other directives set for in the 17 Case Management and Scheduling Order remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carol Mirando on 1/29/2016. (ANW)
|
|
Filing
24
OPINION AND ORDER denying 21 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts II and III of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 5/5/2015. (MAW)
|
|
Filing
18
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 15 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. Counts II, III, V, and VI of the Amended Complaint are dismissed without prejudice to filing a Second Amended Complaint within 14 days. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 1/23/2015. (MAW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
