Morris v. Section 794.05, Florida Statutes, et al
Plaintiff: Cleveland Morris
Defendant: Section 794.05, Florida Statutes, et al
Case Number: 2:2014cv00518
Filed: September 4, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Ft. Myers Office
County: De Soto
Presiding Judge: John E. Steele
Presiding Judge: Carol Mirando
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL dismissing 1 Amended Complaint without prejudice pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge John E. Steele on 9/30/2014. (RKR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Morris v. Section 794.05, Florida Statutes, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cleveland Morris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Section 794.05, Florida Statutes, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?