Burden et al v. Seacrest School, Inc.
Francis Burden and Kristin Burden |
Seacrest School, Inc. doing business as Seacrest Country Day School |
2:2021cv00518 |
July 12, 2021 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sheri Polster Chappell |
Nicholas P Mizell |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. § 794 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 REPLY to Response to Motion re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court with incorporated memorandum of law filed by Francis Burden, Kristin Burden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Hamisch, Alan) |
Filing 21 ENDORSED ORDER granting #20 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to File Their Reply to the Response to Motion to Remand. By September 7, 2021, Plaintiffs will file a reply as previously ordered (Doc. 19). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 8/30/2021. (SM) |
Filing 20 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #16 Response in Opposition to Motion, 19 Order by Francis Burden, Kristin Burden. (Hamisch, Alan) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 19 ENDORSED ORDER directing Plaintiffs to file a reply, not to exceed seven pages in length, to Defendant's response in opposition to the motion to remand on or before August 31, 2021. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 8/23/2021. (CMC) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of a related action -Joint Notice with Defendant per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Francis Burden, Kristin Burden. Related case(s): No (Hamisch, Alan) |
Filing 17 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Hamisch, Alan) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court with incorporated memorandum of law filed by Seacrest School, Inc.. (Rothman, Bradley) |
Filing 15 ENDORSED ORDER granting #14 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to Respond to Motion to Remand. By August 13, 2021, Defendant will respond to the motion to remand (Doc. #13). Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 8/5/2021. (SM) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court with incorporated memorandum of law by Seacrest School, Inc.. (Rothman, Bradley) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 13 MOTION to Remand to State Court with incorporated memorandum of law by Francis Burden, Kristin Burden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A- Contract)(Hamisch, Alan) |
Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #3 Complaint by Seacrest School, Inc..(Rothman, Bradley) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of hearing: Preliminary Pretrial Conference set for 9/16/2021 at 10:40 AM before Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. Parties shall file a Case Management Report by 8/23/2021. All parties shall appear telephonically. The toll-free teleconference number is 1-877-873-8018. The access code is 5997085. You will then be prompted to enter a participant security code: 21518. All parties are encouraged to utilize a landline or similarly stable connection free of ambient interference to avoid having any portion of the conference conducted without them. (WRW) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Civil Action Order by Francis Burden, Kristin Burden. (Hamisch, Alan) |
Filing 9 ENDORSED ORDER. The Clerk is DIRECTED to STRIKE the ADA FAST TRACK SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. #8) and terminate all deadlines contained therein. The parties are DIRECTED to proceed with preparing a Case Management Report in accordance with the Court's Civil Action Order (Doc. #4). Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/20/2021. (AEH) |
Filing 8 ADA SCHEDULING ORDER - FAST TRACK. See order for Court deadlines and directives. Signed by Judge Sheri Polster Chappell on 7/19/2021. (AEH) STRICKEN pursuant to the Court's Order entered on 7/20/2021 at document 9 Modified on 7/20/2021 (JK). |
Filing 7 ENDORSED ORDER granting #6 Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Enlargement of Time in Which to Respond to the Complaint. By July 26, 2021, Defendant will respond to the Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell on 7/19/2021. (SM) |
Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Complaint by Seacrest School, Inc.. (Rothman, Bradley) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Civil Action Order by Seacrest School, Inc.. (Rothman, Bradley) |
Filing 4 CIVIL Action Order. Signed by All Divisional Judges on 7/13/2021. (MLS) |
Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Seacrest School, Inc. with Jury Demand filed by Francis Burden, Kristin Burden. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D)(filed in State Court 5/28/21)(MLS) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Sheri Polster Chappell and Magistrate Judge Nicholas P. Mizell. New case number: 2:21-cv-0518-SPC-NPM. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida, case number 2021-CA-1453 filed in State Court on 5/28/21. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number AFLMDC-18464809 filed by Seacrest School, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Summons served - Exhibit 2, #3 State Court Docket Sheet Exhibit 3, #4 State Court Other Documents Composite Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rothman, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.