Tomlinson et al v. Landers
| James E. Tomlinson and Darlene Tomlinson |
| William J. Landers |
| 3:2007cv01180 |
| December 14, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Clay |
| John H. Moore |
| Thomas E. Morris |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 115 Motion to compel. See attached SEVENTH AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 8/14/2009. (JE)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER denying Plaintiffs ore tenus motion to permit a videographer, court reporter, or both, to attend Plaintiff James E. Tomlinsons Rule 35 compulsory physical examination. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 8/12/2009. (JE)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER finding as moot 34 Motion to Appear Telephonically; granting 44 Motion to extend time; denying 48 Motion to strike; finding as moot 51 Motion to strike; granting 58 Motion to continue. See Attached FOURTH AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER and NOTICE OF HEARING. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 5/22/2009. (JE)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER denying 38 motion to amend/correct; denying 24 Motion to compel; denying 26 Motion to dismiss. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 4/24/2009. (JE)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
