Lee v. Security Check, LLC et al
| John P. Lee |
| Security Check, LLC, Pizza Hut of Florida, Inc. and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
| 3:2009cv00421 |
| May 8, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Duval |
| Howell W. Melton |
| Thomas E. Morris |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 79 Motion for summary judgment; granting 86 Motion for summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 96 Motion to strike. Signed by Senior Judge Howell W. Melton on 8/5/2010. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
77
ORDER granting 70 Motion to dismiss as to Defendant Pizza Hut of America, Inc. Signed by Senior Judge Howell W. Melton on 2/10/2010. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER granting 32 Motion to dismiss; granting 37 Motion to dismiss; granting 46 Motion to strike as set forth in the Order. Signed by Senior Judge Howell W. Melton on 11/9/2009. (JAE)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER denying 26 Motion oral argument; granting in part and denying in part 3 motion to amend/correct; finding as moot 14 Motion to dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 15 motion to amend/correct. See order for details. Amended complaint due not later than 7/30/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas E. Morris on 7/10/2009. (DLC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
