Bryant v. Morgan et al
| Michael Steven Bryant |
| Sergeant Morgan, Unnamed Officer, Lt. Phazer and Susan Smith |
| 3:2010cv00055 |
| January 25, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Charlotte |
| Monte C. Richardson |
| Harvey E. Schlesinger |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER denying 106 MOTION for reconsideration and Granting 106 MOTION for Enlargement of Time. Defendants shall have Fourteen (14) days to file an answer. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 1/4/2012. (DSY)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER denying 71 Motion to dismiss, except with respect to Defendant's assertion that they are entitled to Eleventh Amendment immunity to the extent that Plaintiff seeks damages against them in their official capacities; Plaintiff's Objection (Doc #100) is denied. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 11/30/2011. (RH)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER denying 21 Motion for Relief from Order or in the Alternative Amended Motion for Preliminary Injunction or TRO; denying 22 Motion for entry of default. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 6/30/2010. (TL)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER denying 15 Motion for preliminary injunction; denying 17 Motion to compel; denying 18 Motion to appoint counsel. Signed by Senior Judge Harvey E. Schlesinger on 5/12/2010. (TL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
