Talib v. Reidl et al
| Naiym Shahaab Talib |
| Brian Reidl, Christopher Trowell and Taylor |
| 3:2014cv01388 |
| November 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Jacksonville Office |
| Union |
| Brian J. Davis |
| Monte C. Richardson |
| Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 60 Motion for summary judgment; denying with respect to the excessive force claim against Trowell, the failure to protect claim against Taylor, the retaliation claim against Trowell, the claim that Pl aintiff did not suffer sufficient injury, and with respect to Trowell and Taylor's claim to be entitled to qualified immunity; dismissing with prejudice Defendant Riedl, judgment to that effect will be withheld pending adjudication of the actio n as a whole; granting 81 Plaintiff's request to strike his request for injunctive relief, the request for injunctive relief is stricken; denying without prejudice Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel to Plaintiff filing a separate motion for appointment of counsel and memorandum of law; Plaintiff may file a motion for appointment of counsel within 30 days. Signed by Judge Brian J. Davis on 2/22/2016. (LDO)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
