Smith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Plaintiff: Nyoka Smith
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Case Number: 3:2021cv00815
Filed: August 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Marcia Morales Howard
Referring Judge: James R Klindt
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 the Special Admission Attorney Certification, that the Court construes as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Rachel L. Wright may appear pro hac vice on behalf of Plaintiff. She shall expeditiously ensure mandatory registration with the Court's electronic filing system if she has not done so already. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt on 10/5/2021. (KEH)
October 1, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Second MOTION for Rachel L. Wright to appear pro hac vice by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Johnson, Joseph) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt.
September 28, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER denying without prejudice #9 the Special Admission Attorney Certification, that the Court construes as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(MDC)
September 17, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUPPLEMENT re #10 Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, #9 MOTION for Rachel L. Wright to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-18708349 for $150 by Nyoka Smith. (Johnson, Joseph)
September 16, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER taking under advisement #9 Special Admission Attorney Certification, that the Court construes as a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Plaintiff shall have up to and including 9/24/2021 to file a supplement to the Motion indicating the United States district court bar of which Rachel L. Wright is a member in good standing. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt on 9/16/2021. (MDC)
September 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 MOTION for Rachel L. Wright to appear pro hac vice, Special Admission fee paid, Receipt No. AFLMDC-18708349 for $150 by Nyoka Smith. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing)(Johnson, Joseph) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt.
September 13, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 WAIVER of service returned executed on 09/13/2021 by Boston Scientific Corporation as to Boston Scientific Corporation. (McKee, Traci)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand. filed by Nyoka Smith.(Johnson, Joseph)
September 10, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE to counsel Rachel L. Wright of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGR)
August 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER striking #1 Complaint. Plaintiff shall file a corrected complaint consistent with the directives of this Order on or before September 10, 2021. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Marcia Morales Howard on 8/27/2021. (JMF)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Boston Scientific Corporation. (BGR)
August 24, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), which requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (JW)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Marcia Morales Howard and Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt. New case number: 3:21-cv-0815-MMH-JRK. (SJB)
August 23, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18622260) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Johnson, Joseph) (Modified on 8/27/2021, STRICKEN per #5 order) (BGR).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nyoka Smith
Represented By: Ben C. Martin
Represented By: Laura J. Baughman
Represented By: Rachel L. Wright
Represented By: Joseph R. Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Boston Scientific Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?