McCloud v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Sherry Kanel McCloud
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: SSA
Case Number: 5:2020cv00364
Filed: August 10, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: James R Klindt
Referring Judge: Philip R Lammens
2 Judge: G Kendall Sharp
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 205
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge James R. Klindt. New case number: 5:20-cv-364-Oc-18JRK. Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens no longer assigned to the case. (NAS)
August 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/21/2020. (JWM)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice by Sherry Kanel McCloud. (Fugate, Shea)
August 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #4 Related case order and track 1 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Sherry Kanel McCloud. Related case(s): NO (Fugate, Shea)
August 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 8/12/2020. (RLK)
August 11, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 4 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 8/11/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. New case number: 5:20-cv-364-Oc-18PRL. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. (SJB)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Sherry Kanel McCloud. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Fugate, Shea)
August 10, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Sherry Kanel McCloud. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Fugate, Shea)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: McCloud v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sherry Kanel McCloud
Represented By: Shea A. Fugate
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?