Caslin v. Personal Care Products, Inc.
Plaintiff: Edward Louis Caslin
Defendant: Personal Care Products, Inc.
Case Number: 6:2008cv01275
Filed: July 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability Office
County: Brevard
Presiding Judge: David A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Mary S. Scriven
Nature of Suit: Both
Cause of Action: Diversity
Jury Demanded By: 28:1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 58 Motion for sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge David A. Baker on 12/1/2009. (EC1)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Caslin v. Personal Care Products, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edward Louis Caslin
Represented By: Catherine A. Riley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Personal Care Products, Inc.
Represented By: Lyman H. Reynolds, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?