Penalver v. AsiaUSA, LLC et al
| Vanessa Penalver |
| AsiaUSA, LLC and Elia Golfin |
| 6:2008cv01612 |
| September 19, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Labor: Fair Standards Office |
| Seminole |
| Gregory J. Kelly |
| Gregory A. Presnell |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 29:201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER adopting 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 24 MOTION for default judgment against all defendants filed by Michael Speigner, Vanessa Penalver. Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment 24 is granted in part and denied in part. The clerk i s directed to enter judgment for the Plaintiffs Vanessa Penalver and Michael Speigner against the Defendants Asiausa, LLC and Elia Golfen, jointly and severally, in the total amount of $70,166.10 which breaks down as follows: $29,106.60 in unpaid overtime compensation and $29,109.60 in liquidated damages to Plaintiff Penalver; $4,850.70 in unpaid overtime compensation and $4,850.70 in liquidated damages to Plaintiff Golfen; $1,625.50 in reasonable attorneys fees and $620.00 in costs. The clerk is directed to close the case Signed by Judge Gregory A. Presnell on 5/18/2009. (TKW)
|
|
Filing
25
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 24 MOTION for default judgment against all defendants filed by Michael Speigner, Vanessa Penalver. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory J. Kelly on 4/28/2009. (PAB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
